三峡水库水位波动条件下滑坡抗滑工程效果的数值研究

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 2234-2238.

三峡水库水位波动条件下滑坡抗滑工程效果的数值研究

胡新丽

中国地质大学（武汉）工程学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2005-10-10 出版日期:2006-12-11 发布日期:2013-12-09
作者简介:胡新丽，女，1968年生，博士，副教授，从事岩土工程稳定性评价、地质灾害防治设计教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 40202028）。

Numerical simulation of effectiveness of anti-slide piles construction for landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area under water-level fluctuation

HU Xin-li

Engineering Faculty, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2005-10-10 Online:2006-12-11 Published:2013-12-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 抗滑桩是三峡库区滑坡治理工程中常用的措施，在三峡水库长期的周期性水位波动条件下，抗滑桩工程效果如何，即是否能够保证滑坡的整体稳定，是目前迫切需要研究的重要课题。选择三峡库区巴东县新县城的谭家坪滑坡次级滑坡-白水沟滑坡为研究对象，在分析工程地质条件和设计资料的基础上，建立二维有限元计算模型，选择合理的岩土力学参数和桩计算参数；利用ANSYS 软件，依据不同的模拟方案，分别模拟分析了滑坡在仅考虑自重、自重加暴雨在水位变化条件下的变形和稳定性状况以及抗滑桩的工程效果，即滑坡在设桩条件下的变形和稳定情况。结果表明：①白水沟滑坡破坏机理为牵引式。在暴雨和水位下降条件下，滑坡稳定性降低；周期性水位变化后，滑坡稳定性逐步下降，最终失稳；②依据自重和暴雨工况，考虑175 m降至145 m水位进行的抗滑桩设计，起到了明显的抗滑效果。③周期性水位波动后，滑坡变形破坏逐步加剧，说明抗滑桩虽然起到了的抗滑作用，但阻滑效果逐步下降。因此，在滑坡抗滑工程设计时应考虑该因素的影响，适当提高安全储备。

关键词: 滑坡抗滑桩, 水位波动, 抗滑效果, 有限单元法

Abstract: Anti-slide pile is widely used in landslide improvement in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. How about the effectiveness of the anti-slide piles construction and if it can ensure the landslide stability under the long period reservoir level fluctuation, which is one of the important subjects to be studied urgently. Taking Baishuigou landslide, which is the sub-landslide of Tianjiaping paleo-landslide located in the new Badong County, as a example, based on the engineering geological investigation results and anti-slide pile design data, the 2D finile element model was developed and the rational calculation parameters of the rock and soil and pile were chosen. According to the simulation scheme, with ANSYS software, with pile and without pile, the landslide stability under water level fluctuation, considering gravity only and gravity and strom, was simulated and analyzed separately. Based on them, we analyzed the effects of nti-slide pile under water level fluctuation and storm. The results show that: ① the deformation and failure mechanism of Baishuigou landslide is a pull-type. The landslide stability under storm and water level drawdown from 175m to 145m decreases; during the period water level fluctuation, the landslide stability gradually decrease further to failure. ② the piles, designed under water level drawdown considering the storm, is effective under storm and water level drawdown form 175m to 145m; ③ after a long term period water leverl fluctuation, the deformation has apparently gradually further incrtease; the landslide stability decrease further. Even though the anti-slide pile has anti-slide effectiveness, the anti-slide effectiveness is gradually decrease. Hence, we should consider the effect of the period water level fluctuation when we design antl-slide pile.

Key words: anti-slide pile, water level period fluctuation, effectiveness of anti-slide, finite element method

中图分类号:

TV 698.2+32

胡新丽. 三峡水库水位波动条件下滑坡抗滑工程效果的数值研究[J]. , 2006, 27(12): 2234-2238.

HU Xin-li. Numerical simulation of effectiveness of anti-slide piles construction for landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area under water-level fluctuation[J]. , 2006, 27(12): 2234-2238.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	罗滔，E. T. Ooi，A. H. C Chan，傅少君，. 一种模拟堆石料颗粒破碎的离散元-比例边界有限元结合法[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1463-1471.
[2]	张锟，徐青，王一凡，阿湖宝. 自适应差分进化算法在边坡滑面搜索中的应用[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1503-1509.
[3]	金晓飞，梁书亭，朱筱俊，张玉良，. 软土地区深基坑连续墙最大变形简易计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 583-587.
[4]	刘远锋，郑刚,. 地基排水控制法的沉降和孔压数值分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 592-596.
[5]	陈曦，张训维，陈佳林，金锋，于玉贞,. 水位波动下非饱和心墙土坝体的渗流和稳定性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 609-613.
[6]	赵明华，张锐，刘猛. 下限分析有限单元法的非线性规划求解[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3589-3597.
[7]	扈胜霞，陈育民，闫竹玲,. 弹黏塑性模型及其在预压处理软基沉降计算中的应用[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1173-1180.
[8]	冯又全，杨敏，陈俊岭. 线性分布基床系数弹性地基梁有限单元法改进[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 3027-3034.
[9]	林永生，陈胜宏. 基于有限元计算的边坡三维滑裂面搜索[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1191-1196.
[10]	杜佐龙，黄茂松 . 非均质与各向异性黏土基坑抗隆起稳定分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 455-461.
[11]	倪卫达，唐辉明，胡新丽，吴益平，苏爱军 . 黄土坡临江I号崩滑体变形及稳定性演化规律研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2961-2970.
[12]	彭芳乐，李福林，白晓宇. 针对砂土应变软化强非线性问题的动态松弛有限元法研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 590-596.
[13]	刘杰，姚海林，胡梦玲，卢正，余东明，陈风光. 水位波动下路基湿度动态响应及地下防排水模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2917-2922.
[14]	张桂荣，程伟. 降雨及库水位联合作用下秭归八字门滑坡稳定性预测[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 476-0482.
[15]	汪卫明，刘友良，丁建新，殷德胜. 渗流分析中排水孔模拟的叠单元法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 674-0679.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed