砂卵石层上大直径扩底短墩竖向承载性状

›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 359-362.

砂卵石层上大直径扩底短墩竖向承载性状

高广运¹，蒋建平¹，顾宝和²

1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092；2. 建设部综合勘察研究设计院，北京 100007

收稿日期:2002-12-23 出版日期:2004-03-10 发布日期:2014-07-15
作者简介:高广运，男，1961年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事环境土工、桩基和地基处理的教学与科研工作
基金资助:
高等学校博士点基金项目资助（编号：2000024724）；上海市重点学科（岩土工程）建设项目资助；教育部科学技术研究重点项目

Vertical bearing behavior of large diameter short-belled pier in sand-cobble layer

GAO Guang-yun¹，JIANG Jian-ping¹，Gu Bao-he²

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China； 2. Comprehensive Institute of Geotechnical Investigation and Design, Ministry of Construction, Beijing 100007, China

Received:2002-12-23 Online:2004-03-10 Published:2014-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据同一场地砂卵石层中一组土的深层静载荷试验、一组纯摩擦桩和两组原型扩底墩的竖向承载力静载试验，分析了埋深在6.20～6.75 m处的扩底短墩的荷载传递性状。结果表明，可用直接试验法和间接试验法确定扩底墩的竖向承载力。以卵石层为持力层的S3试验墩的极限承载力为7 250 kN，其中端阻力达6 890 kN，占95 %；以砂层为持力层的S2墩的极限承载力为2 330 kN，端阻力占85 %。当墩顶仅沉降1.46 mm左右时，S3、S2墩侧摩阻力已充分发挥；在端阻力充分发挥时，S3、S2墩顶沉降则分别达92.64 mm和21.07 mm。直径相同时，扩底桩的竖向承载力远大于纯摩擦桩和直身墩。

关键词: 砂卵石层, 大直径扩底短墩, 端阻力, 竖向承载力, 静载试验

Abstract: This paper presented the test results of two large diameter short-belled piers, a deep loading test and a friction pile in sand-cobble layer at the same test site, and accordingly gives a study on the belled piers (embedded depth of 6.20 m-6.75 m) load transfer behavior. The analysis shows that the pier ultimate bearing capacity can be confirmed by direct test method and indirect test method. S3 pier (bearing layer is cobble layer) ultimate bearing capacity is 7 250 kN, end resistance is 6 890 kN, taking up 95 % of the ultimate bearing capacity, and S2 pier (bearing layer is sand layer) ultimate bearing capacity is merely 2 330 kN, end resistance taking up 85 %. When the settlement of loading pier is about 1.46 mm, the skin frictions of pier S3 and S2 have achieved ultimate state; but when the end resistance in ultimate state, the settlement of pier S3 and S2 are 92.64 mm and 21.07 mm; respectively. The vertical bearing capacity of belled pile is greater than the pure friction pile and shaft as their diameters are equal.

Key words: sand-cobble layer, large diameter short-belled pier, end resistance, vertical bearing capacity, static load test

中图分类号:

TU 473

高广运，蒋建平，顾宝和. 砂卵石层上大直径扩底短墩竖向承载性状[J]. , 2004, 25(3): 359-362.

GAO Guang-yun，JIANG Jian-ping，Gu Bao-he. Vertical bearing behavior of large diameter short-belled pier in sand-cobble layer[J]. , 2004, 25(3): 359-362.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	杨苏春, 张明义, 王永洪, 桑松魁, 苗德滋. 基于现场试验的闭口静压管桩贯入层状地基桩端阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 91-99.
[2]	王正振，龚维明，戴国亮，王晓阳，李亮亮，肖刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
[3]	张淑朝，贺少辉，朱自鹏，李承辉,. 兰州富水砂卵石层土压平衡盾构渣土改良研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 279-286.
[4]	任连伟，顾红伟，彭怀风，周杨，. 三种工况下扩底楔形桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1887-1893.
[5]	李小娟，戴国亮，龚维明，徐文希，王磊 , . 砂性土中自平衡试验转换系数取值研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 659-668.
[6]	王新泉，张强，张世民，崔允亮，周星德,. 考虑异形效应Y形桩端阻力产生的附加应力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1268-1280.
[7]	苏世定，杨仲轩，郭望波. 黏土中打入桩竖向承载力计算方法效果评价[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 389-393.
[8]	郭楠，陈正汉，黄雪峰，杨校辉，. 软岩地基中大直径布袋桩抗拔试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 603-609.
[9]	秦月，孟庆山，汪稔，朱长歧. 钙质砂地基单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1714-1720.
[10]	李阳，张嘎. 粉质黏土中单桩竖向承载力的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 180-184.
[11]	刘莹，黄茂松，李帅 . 海上风电桩基础竖向承载力循环弱化简化分析[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2655-2660.
[12]	彭文祥、张旭、曹佳文、. 充气锚杆极限承载力计算方法[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1696-1702.
[13]	高盟，王滢，高广运，顾宝和，杨成斌 . 一种大直径扩底桩端阻力和侧阻力的确定方法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 797-801.
[14]	徐燕，张静娴，何晶，刁钰 . 应用植筋锚固技术进行基桩静载试验的可行性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 309-314.
[15]	王忠福，刘汉东，贾金禄，黄志全，姜彤 . 大直径深长钻孔灌注桩竖向承载力特性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2663-2670.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed