›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 1141-1146.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于固定主应力轴假设的砂堆基底应力凹陷的研究

毕 港1,韦健飞2,周 蕾1   

  1. 1. 德州A&M大学 扎卡里土木工程系,大学城 77843;2. 广西交通科学研究院,南宁 530007
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-04 出版日期:2014-04-10 发布日期:2014-04-18
  • 作者简介:毕港,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    广西科学研究与技术开发项目(No. 桂科金0136019)。

Study of depression of stress on base of sand prism based on fixed principal axes assumption

BI Gang1,WEI Jian-fei2,ZHOU Lei1   

  1. 1. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, USA; 2. Guangxi Transportation Research Institute, Nanning 530007, China
  • Received:2013-01-04 Online:2014-04-10 Published:2014-04-18

摘要: 对砂堆三棱柱的基底应力分布及应力凹陷现象进行了研究,基于固定主应力轴假设(FPA假设)将砂堆分为应力状态已知的I区和应力状态未知的II区,并假设了II区内的多种剪应力分布来求解II区内的应力状态,最后,将不同剪应力分布假设下砂堆中线上的静止土压力系数值与Kulhawy公式计算值对比,可得出如下结论:基底法向应力存在应力凹陷现象,自然休止角越大(砂堆越紧密),应力凹陷程度、应力凹陷范围越大;不同剪应力分布假设下,II区应力分布形态不同,法向应力极小值所在处也不同。剪应力二次方分布假设和三次方假设下砂堆基底应力分布最为合理、最为符合真实情形。

关键词: 基底应力分布, FPA假设, 应力凹陷, 剪应力分布假设

Abstract: This paper focuses on the basal stress distribution and depression of stress of sand prism. The sand prism is divided into a stress known zone I and a stress unknown zone II based on the fixed principal axes (FPA) assumption. On several shear stress distribution assumptions, the stress state of zone II is available. The values of coefficient of earth pressure at rest on the sand centerline on different shear stress distribution assumptions are compared to the one proposed by Kulhawy. The following results are achieved; there is depression of normal stress on the base of sand prism, and the larger of the friction angle (the denser the sand prism) is, the more the depression of normal stress is; and the larger of the depression range is; the shape of the stress distribution and minimum value of normal stress and the location of the minimum normal stress are different on different assumptions; and the assumption of quadratic distribution and cubic distribution of shear stress are most reasonable.

Key words: basal stress distribution, FPA assumption, depression of stress, shear stress distribution assumption

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 毕 港 ,韦健飞 ,周 蕾,. 基于瑞利-里兹法的岩土三棱柱堆积体的基底应力分布的研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 705-709.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[2] 王桂尧,李 斌,罗 军,付宏渊. 粉土基质吸力的新型量测装置与土-水特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3678 -3682 .
[3] 田景元,刘汉龙,李永红. 土石坝下游坝坡砌块在地震作用下的稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 135 -138 .
[4] 郭忠贤,王占雷,杨志红. 高层建筑刚性桩复合地基反力现场测试研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 163 -168 .
[5] 付 伟,汪 稔,李志清,胡明鉴. 单轴载荷下冻土的导电性及机敏性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 1974 -1980 .
[6] 贾 强,应惠清,张 鑫. 锚杆静压桩技术在既有建筑物增设地下空间中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2053 -2057 .
[7] 施成华,彭立敏,雷明锋. 盾构法施工隧道地层变形时空统一预测方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2379 -2384 .
[8] 朱发华,贺怀建. 基于地质雷达和钻孔数据的三维地层建模[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 267 -270 .
[9] 路军富,王明年,贾媛媛,喻 渝,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道二次衬砌施作时机研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 843 -848 .
[10] 王成华,安建国. 含扩径桩的群桩基础竖向承载性状数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 580 -585 .