›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 1397-1406.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.05.023

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部破碎软岩巷道围岩稳定性分析及控制

何富连,张广超   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-15 出版日期:2015-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:何富连,男,1966年生,教授,博士生导师,主要从事资源开采理论与技术、矿山压力与岩层控制、安全技术及灾害防治等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51234005);国家重点基础研究发展计划(No. 2010CB226802);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No.2010YZ02)。

Analysis and control of stability of the fractured soft rock surrounding a deep roadway

HE FU-lian, ZHANG Guang-chao   

  1. Faculty of Resources & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2014-08-15 Online:2015-05-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 针对深部破碎软岩巷道围岩稳定性控制难题,以邢东矿-980车场巷道为研究对象,采用现场调研、数值模拟、井下试验及现场观测等方法分析围岩变形破坏特征,揭示其破坏机制,针对性地提出了以高强锚杆密集支护、新型喷层结构护表、滞后注浆加固为主体的多层次锚喷网注联合支护系统,详细阐明了具体支护措施的围岩控制机制,并用数值方法分析了锚杆间距、喷层厚度对于围岩应力场和位移场的影响规律。研究表明:(1)随着锚杆间距减小(0.7 m→0.3 m),锚杆承压拱和喷层结构的承载能力呈幂函数增长趋势,锚固区围岩压应力呈线性增长趋势,围岩变形量明显降低;(2)随着喷层厚度增大,喷层结构承载能力近似线性增长,锚固区围岩压应力亦呈增长趋势,各部位围岩位移量显著降低;(3)当喷层厚度达到200 mm时,非锚固区内围岩大部分处于压应力状态,拉应力区大幅减少。基于上述研究,结合现场地质、生产条件确定试验巷道围岩支护方案,并进行现场应用。工程实践表明,多层次锚喷网注联合支护技术可有效控制深井破碎软岩巷道围岩大变形,实现深井巷道围岩的稳定性控制。

关键词: 破碎软岩巷道, 高强喷层, 喷层厚度, 锚杆间距

Abstract: To resolve the stability control problem related to the fractured soft rock surrounding deep roadways, a case study is performed on the Xingdong Mine-980 roadway tunnel to investigate the characteristics and mechanism of the deformation and failure of the surrounding rock mass, with combining the procedures of field investigation, numerical simulation, in-situ testing and monitoring and so on. A bolt-shotcrete-net-grouting combined supporting system is developed, which is composed of densely distributed high-strength anchors, newly shotcrete protecting layer and time-lag grouting reinforcement. The controlling mechanism is explored for the surrounding rockmass stability with different types of supporting structures, and a numerical analysis is performed on the influence of bolt spacing and shotcrete layer thickness on the stress and displacement fields of the surrounding rockmass. It is shown that: 1) With the bolt spacing decreasing from 0.7 m to 0.3 m, the bearing capacities of anchor bearing arch and shotcrete layer structure increase following a power law, the compressive stress in the anchorage zone increases practically linearly and the displacement of surrounding rock decreases sharply; 2) When the shotcrete layer thickness increases, the bearing capacity of shotcrete layer structure increases linearly, similar to the compressive stress in anchorage zone; meanwhile, the displacement of surrounding rock decreases substantially; 3) When the layer thickness reaches 200 mm, compression prevails in most part of the surrounding rock without anchors, and the tensile stress zone shrinks significantly. Based on the above simulations, a supporting scheme is proposed and implemented for an experimental roadway with combining production and geological conditions. The field practice shows that bolt-shotcrete-net-grouting combined supporting technique can effectively control the large deformation of surrounding rock.

Key words: fractured soft rock roadway, high-strength shotcrete layer, shotcrete layer thickness, anchor distance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 邓 琴,汤 华,王东英,秦雨樵,吴振君,. 基于应变软化的多阶边坡稳定分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4109-4116.
[2] 高 强,张强勇,张绪涛,向 文,. 深部洞室开挖卸荷分区破裂机制的动力分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3181-3194.
[3] 周 昌,胡新丽,徐 楚,王 强,徐 迎. 基于电磁驱动的滑坡模型水分迁移理论及试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3347-3354.
[4] 张 聪,梁经纬,张 箭,阳军生,张贵金,叶新田,. 基于脉动注浆的宾汉流体渗透扩散机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[5] 王 伸,李化敏,李东印,王 文, . 横肋对螺纹钢树脂锚杆荷载传递的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2805-2813.
[6] 蒋水华,刘 贤,姚 池,杨建华,黄劲松,江先河,. 低概率水平岩质边坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2991-3000.
[7] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[8] 卞 康,刘 建,胡训健,李鹏程,陈玲朱,刘振平, . 含顺层断续节理岩质边坡地震作用下的破坏模式与动力响应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3029-3037.
[9] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[10] 邓华锋,张恒宾,李建林,王晨玺杰,张吟钗,王 伟,胡亚运. 水-岩作用对砂岩卸荷力学特性及微观结构的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2344-2352.
[11] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[12] 孙志亮,孔令伟,郭爱国. 不同含水状态堆积体边坡地震响应特性大型振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2433-2441.
[13] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[14] 温树杰,梁 超,宋亮亮,刘 刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
[15] 吴曙光,付红梅,张岩岩,. 拉压分散型锚索锚固机制及工程应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2155-2163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[7] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[8] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .