›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3400-3409.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.009

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

准饱和土中圆柱形衬砌的瞬态动力响应分析

王 滢1, 2,高广运1, 2   

  1. 1.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2.同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-23 出版日期:2015-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:王滢,女,1979年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41372271)。

Analysis of transient dynamic response of cylindrical lined cavity in nearly saturated soil

WANG Ying1, 2, GAO Guang-yun1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2014-12-23 Online:2015-12-11 Published:2018-06-14
  • Supported by:

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41372271).

摘要: 内源瞬态荷载作用下圆柱形孔洞的动力响应解答是土动力学的经典问题之一。已有研究大都假设孔洞周围土体为理想弹性介质或完全饱和多孔介质。然而,实际工程中不存在完全弹性和完全饱和土体。分别视衬砌结构和周围土体为弹性材料和准饱和多孔介质(饱和度 95%),根据牛顿第二定律、达西定律和Biot波动理论推导出准饱和土体的控制方程。根据边界条件导出衬砌和土体的位移、应力和孔隙压力的Laplace变换空间的解答。利用反Laplace变换数值计算方法,将解答转换为时域解。分析了饱和度对衬砌位移、应力和孔压的影响,结果表明,当95% 99%时,饱和度对径向位移和切向应力的影响较小;99% 100%时,饱和度对径向位移和切向应力的影响较大;但饱和度对孔隙压力的影响远大于对径向位移和切向应力的影响。得出位移、应力和孔压沿径向的衰减规律,当95% 99%时,饱和度对径向位移和切向应力沿径向衰减影响较小,99% 100%时,饱和度对径向位移和切向应力沿径向衰减影响较大,但饱和度对孔压沿径向的衰减影响远大于对径向位移和切向应力沿径向的衰减。

关键词: 准饱和土, 圆柱形衬砌, 瞬态荷载, 拉普拉斯变换, 反变换, 时域解

Abstract: A solution to dynamic response of cylindrical lined cavity under internal transient load is one of the classical soil dynamics problems. Most previous literatures about the problem assumed that soil surrounding with cavity is an elastic medium or full-saturated poroelastic medium. In fact, perfectly elastic and completely saturated soil does not exist in practical engineering. The lining structure and its surrounding soil are treated as an ideal elastic medium and a nearly saturated poroelastic medium, respectively. On the basis of Newton’s second law, Darcy’s law and Biot’s theory, the governing equation of nearly saturated soil is derived. According to boundary conditions, solutions for the radial displacement, hoop stress and pore stress of the lining and saturated soil are obtained in Laplace transform space; and then they are transformed to solutions in time domain using inverse Laplace transforms numerical method. Also, the influence of the saturation degree ( ) on the dynamic response of the lining and soil is investigated. It is indicated that the saturation degree has a less effect on the radial displacement and hoop stress when 95% 99% and has a significant influence on them when 99% 100%. But the saturation degree has much more effect on the pore stress than on the former two. The same conclusion can be drawn that the influence of saturation degree on the attenuation of dynamics response along radial direction. The saturation degree has a less effect on the radial displacement and hoop stress when 95% 99% and has a significant influence on them when 99% 100%. It also indicates that the saturation degree on the attenuation has more effect on pore stress than that of raidial displacement and hoop stress.

Key words: nearly saturated soil, cylindrical lined cavity, transient loads, Laplace transform, inverse Laplace transform, solution in time domain

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431
[1] 夏才初, 刘宇鹏, 吴福宝, 徐 晨, 邓云纲, . 基于西原模型的圆形隧道黏弹-黏塑性解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1638-1648.
[2] 郭兴文,赵 骞,顾水涛,蔡 新, . 基于黏弹性接触的颗粒材料蠕变特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 105-112.
[3] 王 滢 ,高广运,. 饱和半空间瞬态加载衬砌隧道的动力响应研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 850-858.
[4] 段雪铭,李 亮,杜修力,宋 佳. 基于精细时程积分的饱和两相介质波动问题时域解法[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2702-2707.
[5] 王 健,周风华. 采用Laplace变换分析桩基应力波传播问题[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 179-185.
[6] 梁能山,戚承志. 结构体系的一种新型半解析动力算法 ——地下结构动力分析的拉普拉斯积分变换解法[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 198-206.
[7] 杨有贞,葛修润,黄 铭. 基于哈密顿体系辛几何算法求解空间地基问题[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 536-541.
[8] 徐长节,马晓华. 粘弹性准饱和土中球空腔的动力响应[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1189-1194.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[10] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,彭建兵,李 红. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 196 -199 .