›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 753-758.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.018

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复合型加载条件下锈岩断裂韧度试验研究

华 文,董世明,徐积刚   

  1. 四川大学 建筑与环境学院,四川 成都 610065
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-02 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 董世明,1963年生,男,博士,教授,主要从事断裂力学方面的研究。E-mail: smdong@scu.edu.cn E-mail:821624670@qq.com
  • 作者简介:华文,男,1989年生,硕士研究生,主要从事断裂力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.11172186);国家重大科研仪器设备研制专项(No.11327801)。

Experimental research on fracture toughness of rust stone under mixed mode loading conditions

HUA Wen, DONG Shi-ming, XU Ji-gang   

  1. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
  • Received:2014-07-02 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11172186) and the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project (11327801).

摘要: 岩石断裂韧度表征其抵抗裂纹起裂和扩展的能力,作为其力学性能的一个重要指标,在岩石力学理论研究与岩体工程应用中有着不可替代的作用。由于岩石结构的复杂性,其破坏形式大多呈现为复合型断裂破坏,研究复合型加载条件下岩石断裂韧度具有重要的意义。为了研究锈岩的断裂力学性能,以便其在建筑工业中得到更为广泛的应用,通过18个中心裂纹圆盘(CSTBD)试件径向受压试验,进行了复合型加载条件下锈岩断裂韧度的试验研究。测得了锈岩在纯I型,纯II型以及复合型加载时的断裂韧度,并将试验结果与基于广义最大周向应力(GMTS)准则的理论值进行了对比分析,结果表明:锈岩的纯I型断裂韧度为1.01 MPa?m0.5,而纯II型断裂韧度为1.51 MPa?m0.5,是纯I型断裂韧度的1.49倍,这与基于GMTS准则的理论值1.34非常接近,而比基于最大周向应力(MTS)准则的理论值0.87大很多。裂纹尖端附近的T应力及断裂过程区裂纹尖端的临界距离rc对岩石类材料的开裂路径以及复合型断裂韧度都有较大的影响。考虑了T应力的广义最大周向应力(GMTS)准则能很好的预测试验结果。

关键词: 锈岩, 直槽式中心裂纹圆盘, 复合型, 断裂韧度, T应力

Abstract: Fracture toughness of rocks characterizes the resistance to crack initiation and propagation. As an important index of mechanical property, it plays an irreplaceable role in the theoretical research of rock mechanics and practical application to rock engineering problems. Due to the complexity of rock structures, most of rock fractures occur under mixed mode loading conditions. Therefore, it is important to investigate the mixed mode fracture toughness of rocks. Rust rocks are widely used in the construction, and thus are selected to study the fracture behavior. A series of radial compression tests is carried out on 18 cracked straight through Brazilian disc (CSTBD) specimens to obtain the pure mode I, pure mode II and mixed mode I/II fracture toughness. Then experimental results are compared with theoretical values calculated by the generalized maximum tangential stress (GMTS) criterion. The results show that the values of fracture toughness for pure mode I and pure mode II are 1.01 MPa?m0.5 and 1.51 MPa?m0.5, respectively. The fracture toughness of pure mode II is 1.49 times higher than that of the pure mode I. The fracture toughness of pure mode II is close to the value of 1.34 obtained by the GMTS criterion, but is larger than the value of 0.87 achieved by the maximum tangential stress (MTS) criterion. The T-stress and the critical distance (rc) related to the size of fracture process zone in front of the crack tip have a great influence on crack propagation path and mixed mode fracture toughness of rock materials. As the generalized maximum tangential stress (GMTS) criterion takes into account the T-stress, it has a good agreement with experimental results.

Key words: rust stone, cracked straight trough Brazilian disc(CSTBD), mixed mode, fracture toughness, T-stress

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 张 盛, 王龙飞, 常 旭, 王东坤, 王小良, 乔 洋, . 中心直裂纹半圆盘试样的石灰岩断裂韧度 尺寸效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1740-1749.
[2] 赵子江,刘大安,崔振东,唐铁吾,韩伟歌,. 半圆盘三点弯曲法测定页岩断裂韧度(KIC) 的实验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 258-266.
[3] 李一凡,董世明,潘 鑫,李念斌,原 野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
[4] 孟 涛,胡耀青,付庆楠,冯 淦,靳佩华,. 层状盐岩石膏夹层在腐蚀条件下断裂韧度试验及其弱化机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1933-1942.
[5] 曹 富,杨丽萍,李 炼,刘恩龙,王启智, . 压缩单裂纹圆孔板(SCDC)岩石动态断裂全过程研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1573-1582.
[6] 郭俊志,谢其泰,王建力,. 边缘裂缝圆盘砂岩试体III型断裂韧度量测之研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 263-266.
[7] 李一凡,董世明,李念斌. 平台巴西圆盘复合型加载下T应力计算法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 645-650.
[8] 唐世斌 ,黄润秋 ,唐春安,. T应力对岩石裂纹扩展路径及起裂强度的影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1521-1529.
[9] 李一凡,董世明,华 文. 中心裂纹巴西圆盘压缩载荷下T应力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3191-3196.
[10] 戴 峰,魏明东,徐奴文,许 媛,赵 涛. 岩石断裂韧度CCNSCB方法渐进破坏机制与无量纲应力强度因子宽范围标定[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3215-3223.
[11] 苟小平 ,杨井瑞 ,王启智 . 基于P-CCNBD试样的岩石动态断裂韧度测试方法[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2449-2459.
[12] 张 盛 ,李新文 ,杨向浩 . 动载确定方法对岩石动态断裂韧度测试的影响[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2721-2726.
[13] 刘增利,李洪升,邢怀念,张小鹏. 冻土非线性断裂韧度的修正因子测试方法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 908-912.
[14] 邓华锋,朱 敏,李建林,王 宇,罗 骞,原先凡. 砂岩Ⅰ型断裂韧度及其与强度参数的相关性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3585-3591.
[15] 崔振东,刘大安,安光明,周 苗,李志清. V形切槽巴西圆盘法测定岩石断裂韧度KIC的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2743-2748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!