›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 108-116.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于正态分布时间函数地表动态沉陷预测研究

李春意1,高永格2, 3,崔希民3   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院,河南 焦作 454000;2. 河北工程大学教育技术中心,河北 邯郸 056038; 3. 中国矿业大学(北京) 地球科学与测绘工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-14 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:李春意,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事矿山开采沉陷与岩层控制方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41101520,No.51474217);河南省科技创新团队项目(No.13IRTSTHN029);河南省科技攻关(产学研类)项目(No.132107000028)。

Progressive subsidence prediction of ground surface based on the normal distribution time function

LI Chun-yi1, GAO Yong-ge2, CUI Xi-min3   

  1. 1. School of Surveying and Landing Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Education Technology Center, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China; 3. School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2015-09-14 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41101520, 51474217), Science and Technology Innovation Team Foundation of Henan Province (13IRTSTHN029) and Science and Technology Startup Initial Fund Program of Henan Province (132107000028).

摘要: 为了研究地表动态沉陷规律,基于正态分布时间函数,结合地表沉陷预测公式,构建了能够进行任意点任意时刻地表动态沉陷预测的函数模型,分析曲线形态系数对时间函数和计算误差的影响,讨论正态分布时间函数的时空完备性,建立了基于时间函数的地表动态下沉计算公式。以辛置煤矿五采区开采为例,利用空间曲面拟合方法求取了地表动态沉陷预测参数,并对特征点的下沉趋势进行了预测。结果表明,地表沉陷预测时曲线形态系数δ > 2为其合理取值,理论预测相对中误差不会超过±4.55%,且随着δ的增大,预测误差逐渐减小;正态分布时间函数在地表下沉、下沉速度以及加速度方面均体现了地表沉陷时空分布的完备性。基于叠加原理的空间曲面拟合求参方法能够进行预测参数的自动求取,地表特征点下沉趋势预测最大中误差为±64 mm,相对中误差为±5.7%,理论值与实测值相吻合,基于正态分布时间函数的预测模型能够体现地表动态下沉的时空分布特征。

关键词: 时间函数, 正态分布, 动态下沉, 预测模型, 曲面拟合

Abstract: With the aim of researching the law of dynamic surface subsidence, based on normal distribution time function, mathematical models utilized to predict progressive surface subsidence at any point and any moment are derived combining surface subsidence predictive formulas. The influence of curve pattern coefficient and calculation error of normal time function is analyzed. Besides, space-time completeness of normal distribution function is also discussed. Predictive formulae to predict surface dynamic subsidence are established based on normal time function. Furthermore, taking coal extraction of the fifth panel in Xinzhi coal mine, Shanxi province for example, predictive parameters of surface dynamic subsidence are deduced by means of dimensional curve surface fitting. According to those parameters the subsided tendency of surface key points is predicted. The results of this research indicate that the acceptable magnitude of curve pattern coefficient δ should be greater than 2 as predicting surface subsidence. In this way relative mean error of theoretical predictive magnitude will not exceed ±4.55%; and the error will decrease gradually as the increase of δ. Normal distribution function represents the completeness of space-time distribution in response to surface subsidence, subsided speed and accelerated velocity. The methodology of curve surface fitting based on superposition theory can automatically calculate predictive parameters of surface subsidence. And maximum mean error of subsided tendency prediction of key points is ±64 mm, relative one is ±5.7%, which is better fitted with what actual occurs. Subsidence predictive models of normal distribution time function can represent time-spatial distribution characteristics of progressive surface subsidence.

Key words: time function, normal distribution, progressive subsidence, predictive model, curve surface fitting

中图分类号: 

  • TD 325.4
[1] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 杭天柱, 刘抗, 何杨, . 砂类土最大动剪切模量的新预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[2] 张 勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平, . 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933-941.
[3] 钟祖良, 别聪颖, 范一飞, 刘新荣, 罗亦琦, 涂义亮, . 土石混合体注浆扩散机制及影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4194-4202.
[4] 韩智铭,乔春生,朱 举. 含两组交叉贯通节理岩体的强度及破坏特征分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2451-2460.
[5] 张春会,王 兰,田英辉,于永江,王来贵,. 饱和黏土中固定锚腚拖曳锚嵌入轨迹预测模型[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1941-1947.
[6] 范 勇,卢文波 ,周宜红,冷振东,严 鹏,. 一种高地应力条件下爆破开挖诱发振动峰值的预测模型[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1082-1088.
[7] 孙 闯,徐乃忠,刘义新,刘 贵,高 超, . 基于双因素时间函数的松散地层条件下地表点动态沉降预计[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 821-826.
[8] 张 兵,崔希民, . 开采沉陷动态预计的分段Knothe 时间函数模型优化[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 541-548.
[9] 李 刚,张金利,杨 庆, . 不同成因沉积土物理力学指标概率统计分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3565-3572.
[10] 赵国彦,梁伟章,王少锋,洪昌寿. 基于量纲分析的巷道围岩松动圈预测模型[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 273-278.
[11] 罗如平,李卫超,杨 敏, . 水平循环荷载下海上大直径单桩累积变形特性[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 607-612.
[12] 郭鹏飞,杨龙才,周顺华,宫全美,肖军华. 基坑开挖引起下卧隧道隆起变形的实测数据分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 613-621.
[13] 宫凤强,李嘉维,. 基于PCA-DDA原理的砂土液化预测模型及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 448-454.
[14] 石博溢,倪万魁,王衍汇,李征征,袁志辉,. 重塑黄土压缩变形的预测模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1963-1968.
[15] 张 楠 ,夏胜全 ,侯新宇 , 王照宇,. 土热传导系数及模型的研究现状和展望[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1550-1562.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!