›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 232-242.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.028

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地基承载力的双控确定方法

杨光华1, 2, 3,黄致兴3,姜 燕1, 2,张玉成1, 2   

  1. 1. 广东省水利水电科学研究院,广东 广州 510610;2. 广东省岩土工程技术研究中心,广东 广州 510640; 3. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510641
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-11 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:杨光华,男,1962年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,博士生导师,主要从事土的本构理论、深基坑工程、高层建筑基础工程和软土工程的科研及设计。

Double controlling method for determining bearing capacity of foundation soils

YANG Guang-hua1, 2, 3, HUANG Zhi-xing3, JIANG Yan1, 2, ZHANG Yu-cheng1, 2   

  1. 1. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 2. The Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, China
  • Received:2015-11-11 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 分析了目前规范确定承载力的方法,认为其不足之处是没有对应明确的安全系数和沉降变形值,实际应用中存在硬土或低压缩性地基的承载力偏保守,而软土或高压缩性地基以及大尺寸基础的承载力会因沉降变形过大而存在风险。建议地基的承载力应由岩土的强度参数和变形参数对具体的基础进行地基的强度和变形计算,按强度和变形双控的原则确定其最大地基承载力,可以获得地基承载力明确的安全系数和沉降值,获得更为科学合理的地基承载力,能更充分地利用地基的承载力进行地基设计,同时安全也更具有保障性,有较好的工程应用价值。建议现场压板载荷试验用于反算地基土的强度和变形参数,而不是用于直接确定承载力,现场压板试验没有进行到极限状态时建议用最大试验载荷值确定土的强度参数,土的变形参数则对试验曲线采用双曲线拟合确定。文中还建议了简易的双控确定方法,便于应用,通过案例对方法予以说明。

关键词: 地基承载力, 双控方法, 切线模量, 压板载荷试验

Abstract: Reasonable determination of bearing capacity of foundation soils is a most important part of making full use of the bearing capacity of foundation soils. This paper analyzes the method suggested by the present code, and points out some shortcomings such as the corresponding relation between safety factor and settlement value is not clear and definite. In the practical application, the determination of the bearing capacity of stiff soil or low compressive foundation soils is usually conservative; while the soft soil, high compressive foundation soils and large-size foundation will at risks due to large settlement. Thus, a new solution method is proposed in this paper. That is, computing strength and deformation of a specific foundation by using strength and deformation parameters. Then, according to the double controlling method, the settlement requirement and strength safety factor requirement of the foundation soils, the bearing capacity of the foundation soils can be determined. Finally, by obtaining specific safety factor, settlement value and more reasonable bearing capacity of foundation, it is helpful to make better use of the bearing capacity of foundation soils in engineering design. At the same time, safety and engineering value are reached. When the in-situ plate loading test hasn’t reached limit state, one suggestion on determining strength parameters is using maximum test value. The simple double controlling principle is also suggested in this paper. A case study is presented to make application easier.

Key words: bearing capacity of foundation soils, double controlling method, tangent modulus, plate bearing test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472
[1] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[2] 谷建晓, 杨钧岩, 王勇, 吕海波, . 基于南水模型的钙质砂应力−应变关系模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4597-4606.
[3] 王新志,王 星,刘海峰,孟庆山,朱长歧,. 珊瑚礁地基工程特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2065-2070.
[4] 李 舰,韦昌富,刘 艳,. 非饱和黏土状态相关本构模型的数值实现[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2799-2808.
[5] 张玉成,杨光华,胡海英,刘翔宇,骆以道,姜 燕, . 载荷试验尺寸效应及地基承载力确定方法探讨[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 263-272.
[6] 章峻豪 ,陈正汉 ,赵 娜 ,苗强强 ,姚志华 ,秦 冰,. 非饱和土的新非线性模型及其应用[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 616-624.
[7] 闫澍旺,陈 静,孙立强,陈 浩,朱福明,. 深厚软土地基上充灌袋围埝下沉计算研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3537-3544.
[8] 张 蕾. 原位载荷试验确定复合地基承载力方法研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 240-244.
[9] 秦会来 ,周同和 ,郭院成 ,杜 超,. 土钉墙地基承载力问题探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 393-397.
[10] 曹宇春 ,刘富玲,. 基于综合变异系数的地基承载力可靠性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1950-1956.
[11] 杨 扬,卢坤林,朱大勇. 局部剪切破坏模式下的无重地基承载力[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 232-237.
[12] 蒋明镜 ,戴永生 ,张 熇 ,王 闯 ,吴晓峰,. TJ-1模拟月壤承载特性的现场试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1529-1535.
[13] 师 林 ,朱大勇 ,沈银斌 . 基于非线性统一强度理论的节理 岩体地基承载力研究 [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 371-376.
[14] 郭 莹 ,王 健. 基于图像测量的饱和细砂排水剪切试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 24-30.
[15] 朱 磊 ,龚晓南 ,邢 伟. 土钉支护基坑抗隆起稳定性计算方法研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 167-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!