›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1385-1396.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.021

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑地层变异的边坡稳定不确定性分析

祁小辉1, 2,李典庆1, 2,曹子君1, 2,唐小松1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-10 出版日期:2017-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 李典庆,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险控制方面的研究工作。E-mail:dianqing@whu.edu.cn E-mail:qixiaohui2@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:祁小辉,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No. 51225903);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51329901,No. 51528901,No. 51579190)。

Uncertainty analysis of slope stability considering geological uncertainty

QI Xiao-hui1, 2, LI Dian-qing1, 2, CAO Zi-jun1, 2, TANG Xiao-song1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2015-07-10 Online:2017-05-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work is supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (51225903), the Natural Science Foundation of China (51329901, 51528901, 51579190).

摘要: 目前涉及岩土体不均匀性的岩土问题可靠度分析大多只考虑岩土体的固有变异,即岩土体特性参数的不均匀性,未考虑涉及不同岩土体材料的地层变异。地层变异在实际滑坡中广泛存在,其表现为不同类型岩土材料(如黏土、粉土、砂土)的互相嵌套,或一种类型岩土体在另一种较均质岩土体中的随机分布。为此,提出了利用钻孔资料评估考虑地层变异时边坡稳定不确定性的分析方法。根据已有钻孔资料设计了不同的钻孔布置方案,建立了表征地层变异的马尔可夫链模型,采用有限元强度折减法进行边坡稳定性分析,探讨了钻孔布置方案对评估边坡稳定安全系数和失效概率不确定性的影响。以澳大利亚珀斯市钻孔资料为例,分析了所提方法的有效性。结果表明,钻孔布置方案对边坡稳定安全系数和失效概率的不确定性评估有重要影响。考虑地层变异时,边坡稳定安全系数可以用Johnson分布来描述;边坡稳定安全系数统计量和失效概率不一定随钻孔数量增加而单调变化,边坡影响区域以内钻孔对评估边坡稳定安全系数的不确定性最为有效;当钻孔数目逐渐增加时,边坡安全系数均值逐渐收敛至精确值。

关键词: 耦合马尔可夫链(CMC), 地层变异, 边坡稳定, 不确定性分析

Abstract: Most reliability analyses of geotechnical structures considering soil heterogeneity mainly focus on inherent variability, namely the heterogeneity in soil parameters. Another type of soil heterogeneity, i.e. geological uncertainty, is not well studied. The geological uncertainty is very common in reality. It appears in the form of one soil layer embedded in another or the inclusion of pockets of different soil types within a more uniform soil mass. Hence, a borehole-based method is proposed to evaluate the uncertainty in probability of failure (Pf) and statistics of factor of safety (FS) for a slope when geological uncertainty is considered. Firstly, different borehole layout schemes are designed using available borehole data. A coupled Markov chain model is constructed to simulate the geological uncertainty. Secondly, slope stability analyses are conducted using a finite element – strength reduction method. Finally, the effect of borehole layout scheme on the uncertainty in FS and Pf of a slope is analyzed. The borehole data in Perth, Australia are adopted to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the borehole layout scheme has a significant influence on the uncertainty of FS and Pf of the slope. The FS of the slope in the presence of the geological uncertainty can be described by a Johnson distribution. The Pf and statistics of FS do not necessarily vary with the number of boreholes monotonously. The boreholes within the influence zone of slope are the most effective in evaluating the uncertainty in the FS. The mean of the FS converges to an accurate value as the borehole number increases.

Key words: coupled Markov chain (CMC), geological uncertainty, slope stability, uncertainty analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[2] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[3] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[4] 韩同春, 林博文, 何露, 苏钰钦, . 基于GIS与数值模拟软件耦合的 三维边坡建模方法及其稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[5] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[6] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[7] 夏侯云山, 张抒, 唐辉明, 刘晓, 吴琼, . 考虑参数空间变异结构的结构化交叉约束 随机场模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4935-4945.
[8] 刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
[9] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[10] 刘素锦, 郭明伟, 李春光, . 三维边坡整体主滑方向的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 37-44.
[11] 代仲海,胡再强,尹小涛,吴振君,. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[12] 秦雨樵,汤 华,冯振洋,尹小涛,王东英, . 基于聚类分析的边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
[13] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[14] 李术才,贺 鹏,李利平,张乾青,石少帅,徐 飞,刘洪亮. 隧道岩质围岩亚级分级可靠度分析方法及其工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[15] 吴震宇,陈建康. 土坡体系可靠度分析方法及在高土石坝工程中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 699-704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!