›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 263-270.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.032

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

充填料浆流动沉降规律与充填体力学特性研究

卢宏建1, 2,梁 鹏1,甘德清1, 2,张松林1   

  1. 1. 华北理工大学 矿业工程学院,河北 唐山 063009;2. 华北理工大学 河北省矿业开发与安全技术实验室,河北 唐山 063009
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-08 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:卢宏建,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事采矿工艺理论与技术、岩石力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    河北省自然科学基金项目(No.E2014209093, No.E2016209220)

Research on flow sedimentation law of filling slurry and mechanical characteristics of backfill body

LU Hong-jian 1, 2,LIANG Peng 1,GAN De-qing 1, 2,ZHANG Song-lin 1   

  1. 1. College of Mine Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China; 2. Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Mining Development and Safety Technique, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China
  • Received:2016-09-08 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province( E2014209093, E2016209220 ).

摘要: 采场中充填体的几何结构和力学特性是影响充填体质量的控制性因素。通过开展充填料浆流动沉降相似模拟试验及充填体单轴和常规三轴压缩试验,揭示采场充填体的结构特征与强度分布规律,研究不同围压下不均匀充填体的变形特征与破坏模式。结果表明,(1)采场内充填体存在两个分界面和粗骨料、细骨料及灰砂3个不同区域,沿充填料浆流动方向,充填体的强度呈减小 – 增加 – 减小的“S”型分布;(2)充填体三轴压缩轴向应力–应变曲线包括压密、弹性、屈服、应变软化、残余强度5个阶段,相同区域充填体的强度随围压增加而上升,相同围压下不同区域的充填体强度大小依次为灰砂区域>细骨料区域>粗骨料区域。不同区域充填体的黏聚力大小依次为灰砂区域>细骨料区域>粗骨料区域,内摩擦角大小依次为粗骨料区域>细骨料区域>灰砂区域;(3)随围压的增大,充填体宏观破坏裂纹呈增多的趋势,宏观破坏主要为单斜面剪切破坏、张剪复合破坏和“Y”型破坏3种破坏形态。研究成果能为采场的充填钻孔数量与位置设计及稳定性分析提供理论依据。

关键词: 充填料浆, 沉降规律, 不均匀充填体, 单轴抗压强度, 三轴力学特性

Abstract: The geometrical structure and mechanical characteristics of backfill body are factors influencing the quality of filling material. In this study, similar simulation tests were conducted to investigate flow sedimentation law of filling slurry; uniaxial and triaxial compression tests on backfill body samples were carried out to reveal the structural characteristics and strength distribution law of backfill body, and to capture the deformation characteristics and failure mode of uneven backfill body samples under different confining pressures. The results show that: (1) Two boundaries and three areas of coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, cement-tailing exist in backfill body in stope. The strength of backfill body samples has an “S” distribution of diminution-enlargement-diminution along the flow direction of filling slurry. (2) Stress-strain curves of backfill body samples under triaxial compression are composed of five stages of the compaction, i.e. the elastic, the plastic, the post-yielding, the strain softening and the residual stress stages. The strength of backfill body samples in the same area increase with the increase of confining pressure. The strength of backfill body samples in different areas under the same confining pressure is in the order as cement-tailing area > fine aggregate area > coarse aggregate area. The cohesion of backfill body samples in different areas is in the order as cement-tailing area > fine aggregate area > coarse aggregate area, and the internal friction angle is in the order as coarse aggregate area > fine aggregate area > cement-tailing area. (3) The quantity of macro-failure cracks of backfill body samples is on the up-trends as the confining pressure increases, the main macro-failure modes are shear failure of single ramp, tension-shear failure, Y-shaped shear failure. The results can provide theoretical basis for the design of the amount and position of drill holes for filling, also provide theoretical basis for stability analysis of filling material.

Key words: filling slurry, sedimentation law, uneven backfill body, uniaxial compressive strength, triaxial mechanical characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 449

[1] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[2] 王 琦, 孙会彬, 江 贝, 高 松, 李术才, 高红科, . 基于数字钻探和支持向量机预测岩体 单轴抗压强度的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[3] 杜伟飞, 郑建国, 刘争宏, 张继文, 于永堂, . 黄土高填方地基沉降规律及排气条件影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 325-331.
[4] 乐慧琳,孙少锐. 注浆材料和预制裂纹缺陷角度对类岩石试件单轴抗压强度及破坏模式的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 211-219.
[5] 曹 帅,宋卫东,薛改利,. 考虑间歇充填和浓度效应的充填体长期强度试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 341-347.
[6] 侯 鑫,马 巍,李国玉,穆彦虎,周志伟,王 飞,. 木质素磺酸盐对兰州黄土力学性质的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 18-26.
[7] 杨 旭,孟英峰,李 皋,王 良,李 诚,. 一种确定各向异性单轴抗压强度的经验公式[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2655-2661.
[8] 傅鹤林,张加兵,黄 震,黄宏伟,史 越, . 冻融循环作用下板岩弹性参数及单轴抗压强度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2203-2212.
[9] 李 文,谭卓英. 基于P波模量的岩石单轴抗压强度预测[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 381-387.
[10] 李志刚 ,徐光黎 ,袁 杰 ,黄 鹏 ,赵 欣 ,伏永朋 ,苏 昌,. 针贯入仪在软岩强度测试中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 651-658.
[11] 曹 帅 ,宋卫东 ,薛改利 ,王 洋 ,朱鹏瑞 , . 考虑分层特性的尾砂胶结充填体强度折减试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2869-2876.
[12] 刘红岩 ,刘 冶 ,邢闯锋 ,张力民 ,马 敏,. 循环冻融条件下节理岩体损伤破坏试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1547-1554.
[13] 柴肇云,张亚涛,张 鹏,郭俊庆,康天合. 有机硅材料改性砂岩强度与? 电位变化规律[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3073-3078.
[14] 杜海民,张淑娟,马 巍. 初始含冰量对冻结粉质砂土变形与强度的影响[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2855-2860.
[15] 陈小平. 重庆沙溪庙组地层岩石单轴抗压强度研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2994-2999.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!