›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 3976-3982.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0405

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

TBM隧道回填层-管片受力特征模型试验研究

吴圣智1, 2,王明年1, 2,于 丽1, 2,刘大刚1, 2,黄群伟1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-22 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 于丽,女,1978年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程相关教学与科研工作。E-mail: yuli-1026@163.com E-mail:821437063@qq.com
  • 作者简介:吴圣智,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事TBM隧道设计与施工技术研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51208434);重庆市应用开发计划重点项目(No.cstc2014yykfB30003)

Model test study on stress characteristics of backfill to segment in TBM tunnel

WU Sheng-zhi1, 2, WANG Ming-nian1, 2, YU Li1, 2, LIU Da-gang1, 2, HUANG Qun-wei1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-03-22 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51208434) and Chongqing Application Development Plan Key Project (cstc2014yykfB30003).

摘要: 回填层作为围岩和管片之间的连接部分,起到稳定衬砌、传递荷载、吸收变形等作用。护盾式TBM隧道施工过程中,回填层存在未注浆松散、注浆固结两个主要状态。回填层状态不同,回填层作用及管片受力特点也不同。研究采用相似模型试验分析不同状态下的回填层作用机制,通过研究得到了以下结论:回填层未注浆松散状态下,由于碎石的径向压缩与环向移动,围岩传递到管片上的荷载量值降低且分布较为均匀,此时回填层作为“可压缩层”,具有让压和均匀荷载的作用,能明显降低管片的受力和变形;回填层注浆固结后,回填层虽然能够承担少量的荷载与变形,但承载能力有限,主要作为围岩与管片之间的“传递层”,传递荷载与变形;对于挤压性围岩护盾式TBM隧道施工可适当应用回填层未注浆时的“可压缩性”,减小施工过程中管片受力与变形;对于浅埋及地铁隧道则应尽早注浆,使衬砌与围岩形成稳定的受力体系;回填层弹性模量的增加可提高回填层-管片组合体系支护刚度,但增加效果不明显。

Abstract: As a connecting part between surrounding rock and the segment, the backfill layer is used to stabilise the lining, transfer the load, and absorb the deformation. During the construction of shielded TBM tunnel, the backfill layer had two main states: loosened before grouting and consolidated after grouting. The effect of the backfill layer and characteristics of the segment stress depend on the state of characteristics of segment stress. The similar model test was used to analyze the mechanism of backfill at different states, and the following conclusions were obtained. When the backfill is loosened before grouting, due to the radial compression and circumferential movement, the load value of the surrounding rock to the segment is reduced, and the distribution is more uniform. At this time, the backfill is used as the "compressible layer" to reduce pressure and to make the pressure uniform. The backfill can significantly reduce the force and deformation of the segment. When the backfill becomes consolidation after grouting, the backfill layer can bear a small amount of load and deformation, but the bearing capacity is limited. At this time, it becomes the "transfer layer" between the surrounding rock and the segment. The extrusion of the shield rock TBM tunnel construction may use the backfill compressibility before grouting, and reduce the segment force and deformation. Shallow and subway tunnels should be grouting as soon as possible, so the lining and the surrounding rock can form a stable force system. The increase of elastic modulus of the backfill layer can improve the support stiffness of the backfill to the segment system, but the effect is not obvious.

Key words: shielded TBM tunnel, backfill layer, grouting, interaction, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 32
[1] 陈 拓,陈国庆,黄润秋,刘 明. 考虑高边坡强卸荷的锚索锚固力耦合变化模型[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4125-4132.
[2] 蒙 伟,何 川,汪 波,张钧博,吴枋胤,夏舞阳. 基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[3] 邓洋洋,陈从新,夏开宗,付 华,孙朝燚,宋许根, . 地下采矿引起的程潮铁矿东区地表变形规律研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3385-3394.
[4] 杨 朋,华心祝,刘钦节,杨 明,成世兴,吴 标,. 深井大断面沿空留巷底板裂隙分形特征动态演化规律试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 351-358.
[5] 李术才 ,王洪涛 ,王 琦 ,王德超 ,江 贝 ,杨为民 ,张红军 ,李为腾,. Hoek-Brown准则下预应力锚索锚固体破坏的极限分析[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 466-473.
[6] 李 铀 ,袁 亮 ,刘冠学 ,金学玉 ,薛俊华 ,余国锋 ,彭 意 ,张 明,. 深部开采圆形巷道围岩破损区与支护压力的确定[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 226-231.
[7] 周 勇 ,朱彦鹏 . 对“预应力锚杆柔性支护体系的锚杆抗拔力研究”讨论的答复[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3646-3647.
[8] 郝冬雪 ,陈 榕 ,许成顺 ,刘春城 . 基于广义SMP准则及应力路径法的柱孔扩张分析[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2781-2789.
[9] 张尚根,杨延军. 对“预应力锚杆支护体系的锚杆抗拔力研究”的讨论[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3039-3040.
[10] 文竞舟、张永兴、王 成、. 隧道围岩全长黏结式锚杆界面力学模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1645-1651.
[11] 明治清,顾金才,张向阳,陈安敏,徐景茂,孔福利. 锚杆垫板形式对洞室抗爆效果的影响试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2991-2995.
[12] 廖 军. 对“预应力锚杆柔性支护体系的锚杆抗拔力研究”的讨论[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2875-2877.
[13] 周 勇 ,朱彦鹏. 预应力锚杆柔性支护体系的锚杆抗拔力研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 415-421.
[14] 李京爽,侯瑜京,徐泽平,梁建辉,张雪东,宋献慧. 砂土自由场地基水平垂直振动离心模拟试验[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 208-214.
[15] 钱岳红 ,李 杰 ,陈文涛 ,李文培. 考虑卸荷时间的深埋巷道附近破坏特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1347-1352.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!