›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4191-4200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0378

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析

蒙 伟,何 川,汪 波,张钧博,吴枋胤,夏舞阳   

  1. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-18 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 汪波,男,1975年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:ahbowang@163.com E-mail:13028317521@163.com
  • 作者简介:蒙伟,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助(No. 2016YFC0802201);国家自然科学基金资助(No. 51878571,No. 51578456);中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划项目资助(No. 2017G006-B)

Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient

MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031 China
  • Received:2018-03-18 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC0802201), the National Natural Science Fund(51878571, 51578456) and the Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program of China Railway Corporation(2017G006-B).

摘要: 为准确获得桑珠岭隧址区初始地应力场分布规律,提出在岩爆区初始地应力场的二次反演方法。采用最小二乘法寻优准则对隧址区初始地应力场进行多元线性回归分析,利用叠加原理得到在一次反演下的初始地应力场;采用表面应力解除法测量隧道开挖后的洞壁二次应力,记录发生岩爆的部位并据此判断侧压力系数的大小,与在一次反演下相应位置的侧压力系数进行对比,如果两者都大于或者等于或者小于1,则以在一次反演下计算得到的侧压力系数为基准,以其大小不变作为约束条件对初始地应力进行修正,当采用修正后的初始地应力作为应力边界条件,计算得到隧道开挖后的洞壁二次应力与实测洞壁二次应力最接近时,以此时修正后的初始地应力和原位地应力进行回归得到在二次反演下的地应力场。结果表明:当测量原位地应力的钻孔较少且计算区域较大时,一次反演回归得到离钻孔较远位置的应力计算值与实测值存在一定的误差;二次反演在原位地应力的基础上增加实测洞壁二次应力进行修正,得到离钻孔较远位置的应力计算值与实测值吻合更好,所提出的二次反演方法可为类似工程的研究提供参考。

关键词: 侧压力系数, 岩爆, 地应力场, 反演, 表面应力解除法

Abstract: In order to accurately obtain the distribution rule of initial geostress field of Sangzhuling tunnel site, a two-stage back method to calculate initial geostress in rockburst area is presented. Based on the least square method, multiple linear regression is used to analyze the initial geostress field and with superposition principle, the initial geostress field is obtained. The wall stress after tunnel excavation is measured through stress relief method. According to the site of rockburst, the lateral pressure coefficient is acquired and then compared with its equivalent value from the primary inversion in the corresponding position. If both values are larger than or equal to or less than one, then the lateral pressure coefficient is assumed to be the calculated value of primary inversion and the value is taken as the constraint condition to modify the initial geostress. When the calculated secondary wall stress acquired from the modified initial geostress is close to the measured one, the secondary geostress is obtained through the regression analysis with the modified initial geostress and in-situ geostress. The conclusions show that when a small number of boreholes are used for in-situ geostress and with a large computational domain, there are some errors between the measured stress and the calculated stress from the primary inversion in positions far from the boreholes. Furthermore, based on in-situ geostress, the secondary inversion modifies results by using measured secondary wall stress as a complement, and then the calculated stress in positions far from the boreholes shows better agreement with the measured stress, which can be presented as an inversion method to provide reference for similar research projects.

Key words: lateral pressure coefficient, rockburst, geostress field, back analysis, surface stress relief method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 32
[1] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[3] 陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术 及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[4] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[5] 阮永芬, 高春钦, 刘克文, 贾荣谷, 丁海涛, . 基于粒子群算法优化小波支持向量机的 岩土力学参数反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3662-3669.
[6] 陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识 别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[7] 李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[8] 周辉, 陈珺, 张传庆, 朱勇, 卢景景, 姜玥, . 低强高脆岩爆模型材料配比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[9] 赵振华, 张晓君, 李晓程, . 含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2192-2199.
[10] 马春辉, 杨杰, 程琳, 李婷, 李雅琦, . 基于量子遗传算法与多输出混合核相关向量机的堆石坝材料参数自适应反演研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2397-2406.
[11] 苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[12] 罗丹旎, 苏国韶, 何保煜, . 不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[13] 徐 强, 肖 明, 陈俊涛, 倪少虎, . 渗流监测数据缺失处理与渗透稳定判断[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1526-1534.
[14] 严 健, 何 川, 汪 波, 蒙 伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[15] 朱俊高, 蒋明杰, 陆阳洋, 吉恩跃, 罗学浩, . 应力状态对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!