岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2192-2199.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0307

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛特性试验研究

赵振华1,张晓君2, 3,李晓程2, 3   

  1. 1. 山东省地矿工程勘察院,山东 济南 250014;2. 山东理工大学 资源与环境工程学院,山东 淄博 255049; 3. 山东理工大学 矿山工程技术研究所,山东 淄博 255049
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-10 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-22
  • 通讯作者: 张晓君,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程与采矿工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: zhangxj@sdut.edu.cn E-mail:16607713@qq.com
  • 作者简介:赵振华,男,1982年生,工程硕士,高级工程师,主要从事水文地质和环境地质方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省地下水资源与环境工程研究中心开放基金(No.2017KF003);山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2016EL06,No.ZR2015EL016)

Experimental study of stress relaxation characteristics of hard rocks with pressure relief hole

ZHAO Zhen-hua1, ZHANG Xiao-jun2, 3, LI Xiao-cheng2, 3   

  1. 1. Shandong Provincial Geo-mineral Engineering Exploration Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China; 2. School of Resources and Environment, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255049, China; 3. Institution of Mining Engineering and Technology, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255049, China
  • Received:2018-04-10 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Foundation of Ground Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Research Center of Shandong Province (2017KF003) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016EL06, ZR2015EL016).

摘要: 针对非完整硬岩应力松弛特性研究的不足,开展了含卸压孔的具有岩爆倾向性的辉长岩试样峰前加载、松弛和再加载、再松弛模式的应力松弛试验,得出了其峰前应力松弛特性、松弛模型和超声波变化规律,揭示了应力松弛过程的卸压孔作用机制。结果表明:含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛过程经历了迅速衰减、逐渐衰减和稳定3个演化阶段;随峰前加载载荷增加,其应力松弛度总体上呈现增加,能量耗散量增加,用于硬岩损伤破裂演化的能量比例增加;通过波速、波幅和波形变化对比分析可以反映含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛过程的变形损伤破裂演化进程;Burgers模型能较好地反映含卸压孔硬岩的应力松弛特性。经与完整辉长岩试样应力松弛试验对比分析,表明同等情况下含卸压孔硬岩的应力松弛度更大,松弛过程能量耗散量更多,耗散速度也更快。该研究结果对硬岩、含卸压孔硬岩长期稳定性分析、预测及岩爆解危具有很好的指导和借鉴意义。

关键词: 硬岩, 卸压孔, 应力松弛, 波速, 能量耗散, 岩爆

Abstract: Due to the insufficient research on the stress relaxation characteristics of the nonholonomic hard rock, the stress relaxation tests were carried out on the gabbro specimens with pressure relief holes and rock burst tendency. The tests included the modes of pre-peak loading, relaxation and reloading, and re-relaxation. The pre-peak stress relaxation characteristics, relaxation model and ultrasonic variation law were obtained, and the mechanism of pressure relief hole in the stress relaxation process was revealed. Results showed that the stress relaxation process of hard rock with pressure relief holes experienced three evolution stages of rapid attenuation, attenuation and stability. With the gradual increase of pre-peak loading, the stress relaxation degree generally increased, the energy dissipation increased, and the proportion of energy used for damage and fracture evolution of hard rock increased. The deformation, damage, and fracture of hard rock in stress relaxation process can be reflected by the comparative analysis of the wave velocity, wave amplitude and waveform. The Burgers model can better express the stress relaxation characteristics of hard rock with pressure relief holes. Compared with the stress relaxation testing results of intact gabbro specimens, the hard rock containing pressure relief holes had higher stress relaxation degree, greater energy dissipation, and faster dissipation velocity. The research results provide significant guidance and reference for the long-term stability analysis, rock burst prediction and solution of hard rock with or without pressure relief holes.

Key words: hard rock, pressure relief hole, stress relaxation, wave velocity, energy dissipation, rock burst

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2] 陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术 及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[4] 赵军, 郭广涛, 徐鼎平, 黄翔, 胡偲, 夏跃林, 张頔. 三轴及循环加卸载应力路径下深埋 硬岩变形破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1521-1530.
[5] 柳鸿博, 周凤玺, 岳国栋, 郝磊超. 非饱和土中热弹性波的传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1613-1624.
[6] 周凤玺, 柳鸿博, 蔡袁强, . 饱和多孔热弹性介质中Rayleigh波 传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 315-324.
[7] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[8] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[9] 杨道学, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 卓毓龙, . 基于粒子群优化算法的未知波速声发射 定位数值模[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[10] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[11] 陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识 别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[12] 周凤玺, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波的传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3218-3226.
[13] 马德鹏, 周岩, 刘传孝, 商岩冬, . 不同卸围压速率下煤样卸荷破坏能量演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2645-2652.
[14] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[15] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!