岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2748-2754.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0591

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响

陈卓识,袁晓铭,孙锐,王克   

  1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-10 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-28
  • 作者简介:陈卓识,男,1984年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事现场测试、土动力学方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No. 2018A01);国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项 (No. 2016YFE0105500);黑龙江省青年科学基金(No. QC2017037)。

Impact of uncertainty in in-situ shear-wave velocity on the judgement of site stiffness

CHEN Zhuo-shi, YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, WANG Ke   

  1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2018-04-10 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2018A01), the Key Special Project of National Key R&D Plan, International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation (2016YFE0105500) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (QC2017037).

摘要: 岩土工程中的不确定性是工程风险的重要来源。在我国7个主要地区的20个工程场地上开展了国内外首次大范围现场剪切波速不确定性专项试验,共由47家单位用11种工程常用仪器采用单孔法完成,获取了600组土层剪切波速Vs实测数据。依据实测结果拟合了场地时间平均剪切波速Vs, z的变异系数COV与计算深度Z的对应公式,揭示了土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响,进而分析了我国场地分类的可能潜在误判区域。结论如下:在目前我国现场剪切波速测试水平下,Vs, z的变异系数与深度负相关——在近地表处达到极大值15%,并随着深度增加明显减小;地表至10 m深度区间内,Vs, z的变异系数迅速减小;10~20 m深度区间内,Vs, z的变异系数减小趋势变缓;超过20 m深度后,Vs, z的变异系数小于5%且基本不变;我国III、IV类场地分类采用的等效剪切波速Vse和欧美场地分类指标Vs, 30的变异系数基本相等;依据我国建筑抗震设计规范GB50011-2010,对I类场地以及覆盖层厚度小于5 m或等效剪切波速接近500 m/s的II类场地分类时需考虑剪切波速不确定性的潜在影响,其他类型的II类场地、III类和IV类场地在分类时基本可忽略其影响。

关键词: 剪切波速, 不确定性, 场地刚性, 时间平均剪切波速

Abstract: Uncertainty in geotechnical engineering greatly results in engineering risk. In this study, the first large-scale uncertainty experiment on the in-situ shear-wave velocity (Vs) was carried out on 20 typical sites in 7 major regions of China. A total of 11 kinds of common engineering instruments were completed by using single hole method in 47 units, and 600 groups of Vs were obtained finally. According to this in-situ database, the corresponding formula between Coefficient of variation (COV) of time-average shear-wave velocity (Vs, z) and the calculated depth (Z) was fitted. We revealed the impact of in-situ Vs uncertainty on the judgement of site stiffness and pointed out the possible potential misjudging area of site classification in China. At the current level of in-situ Vs test in China, COV of Vs, z is negatively correlated with depth, which indicates that it reaches the max value of 15% near the site surface and then decreases significantly with the increasing of the depth. In the depth range from 0 m to 10 m, the COV of Vs, z decreases rapidly; in the depth range of 10-20 m, the COV of Vs, z decreases slowly; after the depth of 20 m, the COV of Vs, z is less than 5% and basically unchanged; the COV of equivalent shear wave velocity (Vse) used for site classification of Class III and IV sites in China is basically the same as that of the field classification index Vs, 30 used in Europe and America. Based on China building code GB50011-2010, Class I and Class II sites with the soil thickness less than 5 m or Vse close to 500 m/s should consider the potential impact of Vs uncertainty, while other types of Class II and Class III and Class IV sites could ignore the uncertainty.

Key words: shear-wave velocity, uncertainty, site stiffness, Time-average Shear-wave Velocity

中图分类号: 

  • P 642
[1] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[2] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[3] 朱雨萌, 吴 琪, 陈国兴, . 基于颗粒接触状态理论的砂-粉混合料 剪切波速试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1457-1464.
[4] 李术才,贺 鹏,李利平,张乾青,石少帅,徐 飞,刘洪亮. 隧道岩质围岩亚级分级可靠度分析方法及其工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[5] 祁小辉,李典庆,曹子君,唐小松, . 考虑地层变异的边坡稳定不确定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
[6] 方砚兵,苏永华,肖 旺,梁 斌. 基于子区间法的隐式功能函数非概率可靠性方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1171-1178.
[7] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[8] 张 峰,周 峰,王旭东,. 成层地基中单桩竖向承载力鲁棒性设计[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3311-3318.
[9] 辛军霞,吴兴征 ,高 伟,任国家 ,马骏翔 ,范 磊 , . 基于Copula函数的CFG桩复合地基载荷-变形曲线的概率分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 424-434.
[10] 唐小松 ,李典庆 ,曹子君 ,周创兵 ,方国光 , . 有限数据条件下边坡可靠度分析的Bootstrap方法[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 893-901.
[11] 吴兴正 ,蒋良潍 ,罗 强 ,孔德惠 ,张 良 , . 路堤边坡稳定可靠度计算中的模型不确定性分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 665-672.
[12] 谢新宇 ,冯 香 ,吴晓明,. 应变软化土坡渐进破坏的可靠度分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 679-684.
[13] 孔梦云 ,陈国兴 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1239-1252.
[14] 何先龙 ,赵立珍 ,佘天莉,. 基于能量变化率法自动拾取场地剪切波速[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 847-853.
[15] 刘 芳 ,李 震 ,蒋明镜 ,黄 雨 , . 考虑地震随机特征的液化侧向变形超越概率[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3548-3555.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!