岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2755-2764.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0705

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式

杨洋,孙锐,陈卓识,袁晓铭   

  1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-10 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-28
  • 通讯作者: 陈卓识,男,1984年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: various@163.com E-mail: y53739623@126.com
  • 作者简介:杨洋,女,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土地震工程研究
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No. 2017 B 09);黑龙江省级资助项目(No. GX16C006);国家重点研发计划 (No. 2016YFE0105500)。

Liquefaction probability formula of shear wave velocity based on conventional parameters of soil layer

YANG Yang, SUN Rui, CHEN Zhuo-shi, YUAN Xiao-ming   

  1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration; Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
  • Received:2018-07-10 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2017 B 09), the Plan of Heilongjiang Province Application Technology Research and Development (GX16C006) and the Key Special Project of National Key R&D Plan (2016YFE0105500).

摘要: 分析国际上现有液化场地剪切波速473组数据进行参数特征后,以此为基础,采用分区方法,利用成熟的Logistic模型,提出了以地表峰值加速度、剪切波速、地下水位、可液化层埋深等4个参数表达的土体液化概率计算公式和不同概率下液化临界值计算公式,研究了不同概率水平下公式的适用性,并与现有主要方法进行比较。研究表明:地震动强度为液化判别首要影响参数,液化层与非液化层剪切波速区分度不显著,采用以往一个公式构造液化判别公式的方式难以要达到基本要求;现有Andrus公式和石兆吉公式会将很多明显为非液化的场地误判为液化场地,违背了现有认识,达到了不可接受的程度,需要改进。文中公式取50%概率时液化点和非液化点回判成功率符合对等原则,不同烈度下成功率均在70%左右;总体看,公式表现良好,可为中国工程建设提供一个合理、可操作性强的剪切波速液化概率判别方法。

关键词: 液化概率, 概率公式, 土层常规参数, 剪切波速

Abstract: In this study, the parameter characteristics of the database including 473 shear wave velocity test results from all over the world were analyzed. After that, the Logistic model was selected to build a new formula to evaluate the probability of liquefaction, considering four conventional parameters: PGA, shear wave velocity, water table and the depth of liquefiable layer. At last, the applicability of the formula under different probabilistic levels was studied and compared with the existing methods. This study shows that the ground vibration intensity is the primary parameter to influence liquefaction estimation. The shear wave velocity of liquefaction layer does not differentiate from the shear wave velocity of the non-liquefaction layer, so it is difficult to meet the basic requirements by using a semplice formula. The methods developed by Andrus and Shi Zhaoji misjudge many obvious non-liquefied points. Those misjudgments breach the existing knowledge and need improvements. The formula developed by this paper conforms to equal distribution of liquefaction points and non-liquefaction points when PL=50%, and the accuracy can reach about 70% in different intensity levels. In summary, this formula provides a reasonable and easy-to-use shear wave velocity liquefaction evaluation method.

Key words: liquefaction probability, probabilistic equation, conventional soils parameters, shear wave velocity

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[2] 朱雨萌, 吴 琪, 陈国兴, . 基于颗粒接触状态理论的砂-粉混合料 剪切波速试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1457-1464.
[3] 孔梦云 ,陈国兴 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1239-1252.
[4] 何先龙 ,赵立珍 ,佘天莉,. 基于能量变化率法自动拾取场地剪切波速[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 847-853.
[5] 丁伯阳,张 勇. 杭州第四系软土动力特性试验与土结构性影响的探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 336-342.
[6] 何先龙,赵立珍. 基于多重互相关函数分析剪切波速[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2541-2545.
[7] 蔡国军,刘松玉,童立元,杜广印. 基于SCPTU的软土最大剪切模量测试分析研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2556-2560.
[8] 董连成 ,陶夏新 ,师黎静 ,李广影 . 利用地脉动台阵记录反演场地浅层Vs结构[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 553-556.
[9] 程国勇 ,王建华 ,张献民 . 饱和砂土的剪切波速与其抗液化强度关系研究[J]. , 2007, 28(4): 689-693.
[10] 侯兴民 ,杨学山 ,廖振鹏 ,薄景山,. 基于互相关函数的单孔法波速测试优化算法[J]. , 2006, 27(7): 1161-1165.
[11] 缪林昌,邱 钰. SASW法在基础工程和路基工程中的应用研究[J]. , 2004, 25(1): 149-152.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!