不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2432

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1331-1340.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2432

不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究

罗丹旎^{1, 2, 3}，苏国韶^{1, 2, 3}，何保煜¹

1. 广西大学土木建筑工程学院，广西南宁 530004；2. 广西大学广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室，广西南宁 530004； 3. 广西大学工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室，广西南宁 530004

收稿日期:2017-12-06 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-25
通讯作者: 苏国韶，男，1973年生，博士，教授，主要从事深部岩体力学与工程安全方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: suguoshao@163.com E-mail: luodanni-716@163.com
作者简介:罗丹旎，女，1988年生，博士，讲师，主要从事水工结构方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41472329，No. 51709050)；广西重点实验室系统性研究项目资助(No. 2016ZDX006)。

True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations

LUO Dan-ni^{1, 2, 3}, SU Guo-shao^{1, 2, 3}, HE Bao-yu¹

1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Engineering Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China

Received:2017-12-06 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-25
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472329, 51709050) and the Systematic Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety (2016ZDX006).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用真三轴岩爆试验系统，开展了不同饱水度红色粗晶花岗岩的岩爆试验，分析了不同饱水度下岩爆破坏岩样的强度与变形特征、破坏与弹射特征、声发射特性等，探讨了岩石饱水度与岩爆弹射动能的定量关系以及水对岩爆的影响机制。研究结果表明：（1）当岩样的相对饱水度超过0.3，其峰值应力和屈服应力较天然状态的明显降低；（2）岩样饱水度的增加使得岩爆过程中小颗粒弹射减少、小岩片剥落增多、岩板外鼓现象减弱，且岩爆坑体积减小、岩爆碎块的粒径分布由连续分布变为不连续分布；（3）随饱水度的增加，岩爆发生前夕声发射撞击数显著下降的平静期的总历时呈缩短趋势，岩爆发生时刻的声发射撞击数呈增大趋势，且累积绝对能量呈减小趋势、能量释放速度呈放缓趋势，表明岩样塑性破坏特性有所增强；（4）岩爆弹射动能随饱水度的增大而显著减小，二者呈单调线性的负相关关系，水对岩石的作用主要是软化和水楔作用，水的黏性也会对碎块弹射产生影响。

关键词: 岩爆, 真三轴试验, 饱水度

Abstract: The rockburst experiments were conducted on red coarse-grain granites with different water saturations by using true triaxial rockburst test system. Then this study analyzed the characteristics of strength and deformation, damage and ejection process, failure mode and acoustic emission (AE) of rock specimens after rockburst with different water saturations. The relationship between the water saturation and kinetic energy of rockburst ejection and the influence mechanism of water on rockburst were discussed as well. The results showed that when the water saturation of specimens exceeded 0.3, the peak stress and yield stress of the specimens were significantly lower than those of natural specimens. With the increasing of water saturation, the ejecting behavior of small particles decreased, the spalling behavior of small rock slices increased, and the bulging behavior of rock plates weakened during the process of rockburst. Moreover, the volume of rockburst pits decreased, and the particle-size distribution of rockburst fragments became discontinuous. With the increasing of water saturation, the duration of ‘quiet period’ decreased, in which AE impact number dropped significantly before rockburst. Besides, the AE impact number increased at the moment of rockburst, while the accumulated absolute energy and the energy release rate declined, which indicated that the plastic failure of specimen enhanced. The rockburst kinetic energy of specimens decreased obviously with the increasing of water saturation, which exhibited a monotonous linear relationship between the kinetic energy and water saturation. Water mainly showed softening and water wedge effects on rock, and the viscosity of water also affected the ejection of rock fragments.

Key words: rockburst, true triaxial test, water saturation

中图分类号:

TV 32

罗丹旎, 苏国韶, 何保煜, . 不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.

LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2]	陈炳瑞, 冯夏庭, 符启卿, 王搏, 朱新豪, 李涛, 陆菜平, 夏欢, . 综合集成高精度智能微震监测技术及其在深部岩石工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3]	陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[4]	李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[5]	周辉, 陈珺, 张传庆, 朱勇, 卢景景, 姜玥, . 低强高脆岩爆模型材料配比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[6]	宫凤强, 伍武星, 李天斌, 司雪峰, . 深部硬岩矩形隧洞围岩板裂破坏的试验模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2085-2098.
[7]	赵振华, 张晓君, 李晓程, . 含卸压孔硬岩应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2192-2199.
[8]	苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[9]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[10]	梅诗明, 胡小川, 苏国, 陈冠言, . 中间主应力对隧洞岩爆影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[11]	赵菲, 王洪建, 何满潮, 袁广祥, 罗耀武, . 不同高度花岗岩岩爆试验的声发射特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[12]	王之东, 黎立云, 陈滔, 刘兵权, . 矿柱岩爆模型试验中能量释放研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[13]	肖晓春, 丁鑫, 潘一山, 吕祥锋, 吴迪, 王磊, 樊玉峰, . 含瓦斯煤岩真三轴多参量试验系统研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 451-462.
[14]	张坤勇，李威，Charkley Nai Frederick，陈恕,. 小主应力方向加载条件下的掺砾黏土真三轴试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3270-3276.
[15]	李凯达，胡少斌，李小春，伍键，樊清怡，伍海清，. 单相流体对砂岩强度特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1789-1795.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

不同饱水度花岗岩的真三轴岩爆试验研究

True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0