岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1158-1168.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0958

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变 化的岩土固结渗流分析

郑黎明1, 2,张洋洋3,李子丰1,马平华1,阳鑫军1   

  1. 1. 燕山大学 车辆与能源学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004;2. 燕山大学 机械工程博士后流动站,河北 秦皇岛 066004; 3. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-11 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-08
  • 作者简介:郑黎明,男,1989年生,博士后,主要从事复杂油气藏物理化学强化开采理论方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No.51504215);中国博士后基金(2018M631765);河北省博士后择优资助(B2018003011);燕山大学博士基金(No.BL17024)

Analysis of seepage changes during poroelastic consolidation process with porosity and pressure variation under low-frequency vibration

ZHENG Li-ming1, 2, ZHANG Yang-yang3, LI Zi-feng1, MA Ping-hua1, YANG Xin-jun1   

  1. 1. College of Vehicles and Energy of Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China; 2. Postdoctoral Research Station of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China; 3. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
  • Received:2017-05-11 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51504215), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2018M631765), Hebei Province Postdoctoral Advanced Programs(B2018003011) and the Doctoral Foundation of Yanshan University (BL17024).

摘要: 低频波动激励下实际开发储层物性发生改变,开展一维定压或定压力梯度情形岩土固结分析,难以反映具有变化流速、压力梯度的实际储层近井带波动激励效果。推导了低渗孔隙介质固结模型控制方程,建立了考虑不同孔隙度、压力变化程度的3种饱和单相渗流流体孔隙介质固结模型,开展一维、径向物理模型模拟求解,进而评价低频波动在恒定或变压力梯度、不同固结模型下的作用效果及参数影响敏感性。结果表明,考虑低渗储层渗流惯性作用和较强应力敏感性时,波动作用下(恒定压力梯度)一维模型的压力、流速、孔隙度增幅整体减小,(变压力梯度)径向物理模型波诱导作用出现不同变化,压力、孔隙度增幅增加,流速增幅降低;随振动参数增加,径向物理模型物性最大增幅数值波动性变化更为剧烈。研究结论反映了实际储层低频波动激励效果的复杂性及动力学分析的必要性。

关键词: 固结模型, 渗流变化, 压力梯度, 数值分析, 近井带

Abstract: The physical properties in actual developed reservoirs change under the stimulation of low-frequency vibration. However, no change in porosity and pressure is usually assumed in classic consolidation model. The analysis of solid deformation is often based on a one-dimensional physical model with constant pressure (or pressure gradient) condition. Therefore, it is usually inadequate to simulate the effect of seismic production technology near the wellbore in actual developing reservoirs, which are with varying flow velocities and pressure gradients, with the classic mathematic model and one-dimensional physical model. The control equations of consolidation model for low permeability porous media are re-derived from the continuity equations of fluid and solid. Considering different assumptions of variation extents of porosity and pressure, three consolidation models are given. Numerical simulation is then carried out with one-dimensional (with constant pressure gradient) or radial (with changing pressure gradient) physical model. The effect of seismic production technology as well as its sensitivity under different fluid and vibration parameters are evaluated with different consolidation models. Because of the influences of the inertia effect of initial flow and the strong stress sensitivity in low permeability reservoir, the increases of pressure, flow velocity, and porosity are found to be lower under vibration than the case without vibration in one-dimensional model. However, the wave-induced effect behaves differently in radial physical model. The increases of pressure and porosity are both higher under vibration than the case without vibration, and the increase of flow velocity becomes lower under vibration. As the vibration parameter increases, the volatility of values representing the wave-induced effect becomes stronger when simulated with radial physical model and different consolidation models. The results reflect that it is necessary to carry out a dynamic analysis on the complex effects of artificial seismic technology in actual developing reservoirs.

Key words: consolidation model, seepage change, pressure gradient, numerical analysis, nearby wellbore

中图分类号: 

  • TE357
[1] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[2] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[3] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[4] 王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[5] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[6] 阿比尔的,郑颖人,冯夏庭,丛 宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[7] 郭浩然,乔 兰,李 远. 能源桩与周围土体之间荷载传递模型的改进及其桩身承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4042-4052.
[8] 李一凡,董世明,潘 鑫,李念斌,原 野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
[9] 郭 洋,李 清,徐文龙,钱 路,田 策. 条形药包爆破预制贯通裂纹动态断裂过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3882-3890.
[10] 刘天翔,王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[11] 宋许根,陈从新,夏开宗,陈龙龙,付 华,邓洋洋,杜根明,. 竖井变形破坏机制与继续使用可行性探究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 331-342.
[12] 汪 昕,蔡 明, . 地震动在地下采场开挖边界的耦合数值分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3347-3354.
[13] 方 志,陈育民,何森凯,何 稼, . 减饱和松砂静态液化的水-气两相流耦合分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3378-3384.
[14] 李一凡,董世明,李念斌. 平台巴西圆盘复合型加载下T应力计算法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 645-650.
[15] 邱明明 ,杨 啸 ,杨果林 ,房以河,. 云桂高速铁路新型全封闭路堑基床动响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 537-544.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!