岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3153-3166.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0883

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响

朱才辉,崔 晨,兰开江,东永强   

  1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-21 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 作者简介:朱才辉,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事黄土力学与工程、地下洞室稳定性分析等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51678484);陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室科研计划项目(No. 16JS073);国家留学基金委(No. 201808610061)。

The effects of the degradation of brick-clay structure and demolition of embedded buildings on the stability of Yulin City Wall

ZHU Cai-hui, CUI Chen, LAN Kai-jiang, DONG Yong-qiang   

  1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • Received:2018-05-21 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678484), the Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics (16JS073) and the China Scholarship Council (201808610061).

摘要: 研究古城墙在环境和人为破坏因素下的稳定性对于古城墙保护和修复工程具有重要科学意义。以陕西榆林卫城为研究背景,对其保存现状进行大量调研,对砖墙砌体及夯土材料力学特性进行原位测试和室内试验,再基于数值方法来综合评判砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物在拆除过程中古城墙的整体稳定性和受力性态。结果表明:(1)城墙夯土受水分入渗后平均含水率w≥11.5%或顶部剥蚀长度L≥2.5 m时,安全系数低于设计值 1.3,而外墙砌体劣化对城墙整体稳定性影响不大,表明夯土的强度对城墙整体稳定性起着决定性作用;(2)拆除2层以上、入侵深度超过3.0 m的民居或拆除1层的入侵深度超过2.5 m的邻近建筑物时,城墙顶部夯土塑性区几乎贯通至城墙顶部;(3)拆除高2.0 m宽超过4.0 m的贯通城墙的门洞或层高4.0 m宽超过2.5 m的贯通城墙的民居时,建筑物顶部以上夯土塑性区贯通至城墙顶部,可能会出现坍塌危险,而拆除断面尺寸低于2.0 m×2.0 m的贯通城墙的建筑物时,对其城墙稳定性影响不大。

关键词: 榆林卫城, 稳定性, 砖-土结构力学性质, 数值分析

Abstract: It is significant to study the stability of ancient city wall for its conservation and restoration under the environmental and human destruction conditions. In this study, the current preservation situation of Yulin City Wall (YCW) were investigated, and the mechanical properties of masonry structures and rammed soil in city wall were tested by in-situ tests and laboratory experiments. The overall stability and stress-strain state of the city wall were analysed with numerical method when the brick-clay structures turned degraded, and the embedded buildings were demolished. The research results show that: 1) The safety factor is smaller than the design value of 1.3 when the average water content of the rammed soil is larger than 11.5% during the rainfall infiltration stage or the denudation length of rammed soil at the top of the city wall larger than 2.5 m. However, the degradation of masonry structures has little effect on the stability of the city wall, which indicates that the strength of the rammed soil plays a determining role on the overall stability of the city wall. 2) The plastic zone almost extends to the top of the city wall, when 2 or 3-storey high buildings embedded 3.0 m depth or 1-story high buildings embedded 2.5 m depth in the bottom of the city wall are demolished. 3) The plastic zone may extend to the top of the city wall and will collapse, when the penetrative door with the width larger than 4.0 and 1-storey high building with the width larger than 2.5 m are demolished, respectively. It has no influence on the stability of the city wall, when the penetrative buildings with the section size smaller than 2.0 m×2.0 m are demolished.

Key words: Yulin City Wall (YCW), stability, mechanical property of brick-clay structure, numerical analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[5] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[6] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[7] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[8] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[9] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[10] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[11] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[12] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[13] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[14] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[15] 陈建功, 李 会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!