岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1836-1844.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1491

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法

肖世国1, 2,刘航1,于昕左1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 地质工程系,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-28 修回日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-07-31
  • 作者简介:肖世国,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性与支挡结构方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51578466)。

Analysis method of seismic overall stability of soil slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements

XIAO Shi-guo1, 2, LIU Hang1, YU Xin-zuo1   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2019-08-28 Revised:2019-11-22 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-07-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578466).

摘要: 为合理分析水平柔性拉筋式重力墙?墙后坡体地震整体稳定性,考虑坡顶条形均布荷载作用以及拉筋拔出和拉断两种破坏模式,采用拟静力法与分区水平条分及斜条分极限平衡法,基于Fellenius法与简化Bishop法的条间力假定,推导了相应的墙?坡地震整体稳定系数计算公式,并通过数值模拟方法对不同水平地震影响系数的情况予以验证,且讨论了墙后填土与地基土的内摩擦角及黏聚力、筋带间距、长度及其极限拉力对墙?坡地震整体稳定性的影响特征。实例分析结果表明,简化Bishop法与数值模拟得到的墙?坡地震整体稳定系数较为接近,比Fellenius法的结果约高出6%;墙?坡地震整体稳定系数随填土及地基土抗剪强度参数的增大呈近似线性增大,随筋带拉力及顶层筋带长度在一定范围内的增加呈非线性增大,随筋带竖向间距的增大呈非线性减小;理论方法与数值模拟得到的潜在滑面也较为一致。

关键词: 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙, 墙?坡地震整体稳定性, 水平条分法, 拟静力法, 极限平衡

Abstract: In order to reasonably analyze seismic stability of filling slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements, the quasi-static method combined with the horizontally and obliquely slicing limit equilibrium methods are adopted to derive the safety factor of the wall-slope overall stability based on the hypothesis of interslice forces proposed by the Fellenius and the simplified Bishop methods. Considering the tensile rupture and the potential pulling out failure mechanism of the reinforcements, the proposed method is verified through numerical simulations under various horizontal seismic effect coefficients. Then the influences of the internal friction angle, the cohesion of the backfill and foundation soil, the vertical spacing, the ultimate tensile force, and the length of the reinforcements on the seismic wall-slope overall stability are studied, respectively. The results show that the safety factor calculated by the proposed method with the simplified Bishop’s hypothesis is fairly identical with the numerical results, which is about 6% higher than that calculated by the proposed method with the Fellenius hypothesis. Besides, the safety factor increases approximately linearly with the increase of shear strength of the filling and foundation soil, increases nonlinearly with the increase of the ultimate tensile force and the length of the top reinforcement, but decreases nonlinearly with the increase of the vertical spacing of the reinforcements. Additionally, potential slip surfaces of the retained slope by the proposed methods are close to the numerical results.

Key words: gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements, seismic wall-slope overall stability, horizontal slice method, quasi-static method, limit equilibrium

中图分类号: 

  • TU432
[1] 章瑞环, 叶帅华, 陶晖. 基于改进极限平衡法的多级均质黄土边 坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 813-825.
[2] 刘杨, 刘维, 史培新, 赵宇, 王秒, . 超深地连墙成槽富水软弱层局部失稳理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 9-18.
[3] 孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[4] 李英俊, 夏元友, 王智德. 地震作用下土钉支护边坡震后位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3013-3021.
[5] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[6] 陈建功, 李 会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[7] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[8] 余国, 谢谟文, 孙紫豪, 刘鹏. 基于GIS的三维对称边坡滑面正应力分布 逼近函数构造[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2332-2340.
[9] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[10] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[11] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[12] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[13] 杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,罗 宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
[14] 张 健,王新征,胡瑞林,. 无限倾斜填土非竖直墙背条件下地震主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1069-1074.
[15] 卢坤林,王运敏,朱大勇,. 三维滑体锚固力计算方法及工程应用[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 501-506.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[4] 潘 岳,戚云松,李爱武. 对“深埋隧道开挖围岩失稳突变模型研究”的讨论[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3210 -3214 .
[5] 赵明华,张 玲,曹文贵,马缤辉. 基于弹性地基梁理论的土工格室加筋体变形分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3695 -3699 .
[6] 毛昶熙,段祥宝,吴良骥. 砂砾土各级颗粒的管涌临界坡降研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3705 -3709 .
[7] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[8] 董 诚,郑颖人,陈新颖,唐晓松. 深基坑土钉和预应力锚杆复合支护方式的探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3793 -3796 .
[9] 吴 健,谢新宇,朱向荣. 饱和土体一维复杂非线性固结特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 81 -86 .
[10] 苗强强,张 磊,陈正汉,黄雪峰. 非饱和含黏砂土的广义土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 102 -106 .