岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3054-3061.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0854

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

连续排水边界下分数阶黏弹性 饱和土体一维固结分析

田乙1,吴文兵1, 2,蒋国盛1,梅国雄1, 2,徐宝军3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学 工程学院 岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074; 2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 山东省城乡建设勘察设计研究院,山东 济南 250031
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-05 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 吴文兵,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事桩基动力学、固结理论方面的研究工作。E-mail:zjuwwb1126@163.com E-mail:tianyibox@163.com
  • 作者简介:田乙,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事地基固结处理方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51578164,No. 51678547,No. 51878185)

One-dimensional consolidation of viscoelastic saturated soils with fractional order derivative based on continuous drainage boundary

TIAN Yi1, WU Wen-bing1, 2, JIANG Guo-sheng1, MEI Guo-xiong1, 2, XU Bao-jun3   

  1. 1. Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Shandong Province Investigation & Survey Design Institute of Urban & Rural Construction, Jinan, Shandong 250031, China
  • Received:2018-08-05 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578164, 51678547, 51878185).

摘要: 采用分数阶Kelvin模型来描述饱和土体的流变特性,在连续排水边界条件下,利用Laplace变换推导出变换域内的饱和土体一维固结解析解,再通过Crump法对有效应力和固结沉降进行数值反演,得到了分数阶导数黏弹性饱和土体的一维固结半解析解。将连续排水边界退化到Terzaghi排水边界,退化后的结果与已有文献一致,验证了所得半解析解的可靠性。最后,基于所得解,分析了相关参数对土体固结的影响。结果表明,界面参数反映排水边界的透水性,从而影响土体中超孔隙水压力的消散速率;黏滞系数在固结后期对沉降发展影响较大,其值越大,沉降发展越慢;当阶次 不为零时,分数阶次越小,土体表现出的黏滞性越强,整体固结沉降发展越缓慢,次固结沉降发展也越缓慢。

关键词: 连续排水边界, 分数阶导数, 黏弹性, 黏滞系数, 分数阶次

Abstract: The fractional order derivative Kelvin constitutive model is used to describe the rheological characteristics of saturated soils. With continuous drainage boundary, the Laplace transform is used to derive the analytical solutions of the one-dimensional consolidation of soil in the transformed domain. Then the corresponding semi-analytical solutions of the effective stress and the settlement are obtained through inverse Laplace transform based on Crump’s method. The rationality of the proposed solutions is validated by reducing the presented solutions based on continuous drainage boundary to those based on the Terzaghi drainage boundary. Finally, the effects of relevant parameters on consolidation behavior of soil are investigated by the obtained solutions. The results show that the interface parameter reflects the permeability of the drainage boundary, which has an obvious effect on the dissipation rate of the excess pore water pressure in soil. The viscosity coefficient greatly affects the settlement development in the later stage of consolidation, and the larger the viscosity coefficient is, the slower the settlement development is. When ? is not zero, a smaller fractional order α indicates a stronger viscosity, a longer consolidation process and a slower development of secondary consolidation.

Key words: continuous drainage boundary, fractional order derivative, viscoelasticity, viscosity coefficient, fractional order

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+2
[1] 徐进, 王少伟, 杨伟涛. 水位变化下可压缩土层的黏弹性耦合变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1065-1073.
[2] 赵密, 欧阳文龙, 黄景琦, 杜修力, 赵旭, . P波作用下跨断层隧道轴线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[3] 李称, 吴文兵, 梅国雄, 宗梦繁, 梁荣柱, . 不同排水条件下城市固废一维降解固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3071-3080.
[4] 刘忠玉, 崔鹏陆, 郑占垒, 夏洋洋, 张家超. 基于非牛顿指数渗流和分数阶Merchant模型的 一维流变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2029-2038.
[5] 童立红, 王 珏, 郭生根, 朱怀龙, 徐长节, . 变荷载下连续排水边界黏弹性地基 一维固结性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1862-1868.
[6] 杨秀荣,姜谙男,江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[7] 周兴涛,盛 谦,崔 臻,冷先伦,付晓东,马亚丽娜, . 颗粒离散单元法动力人工边界设置方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2671-2680.
[8] 王观石,熊 鹏,胡世丽,孟世明,龙 平,谭 谈,. 位移不连续模型在黏弹性节理刚度计算的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2175-2183.
[9] 王 瑞, 胡志平, 张亚国, 张 勋, 柴少波, . 黏弹性介质中平、柱面波动传播的 应力场及应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4665-4672.
[10] 汪 磊,李林忠,徐永福,夏小和,孙德安,. 半透水边界下分数阶黏弹性饱和土一维固结特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4142-4148.
[11] 李银平,孔庆聪,施锡林,李 硕,杨博进,杨春和,. 盐穴地下储库地表沉降的黏弹模型及应用[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2049-2058.
[12] 闫富有,常 键,刘忠玉. 黏弹-双曲线Drucker-Prager塑性模型应力更新隐式算法[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1797-1804.
[13] 刘忠玉,杨 强. 基于分数阶Kelvin模型的饱和黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3680-3687.
[14] 储昭飞,刘保国,刘开云,孙景来. 非静水应力场中圆形隧道衬砌与围岩间两种接触的黏弹性解析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3215-3224.
[15] 解 益,李培超,汪 磊,孙德安,. 分数阶导数黏弹性饱和土体一维固结半解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3240-3246.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!