岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3197-3206.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0952

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高铁运行引起的高架桥群桩基础地面振动衰减分析

高广运1, 2,谢伟1, 2,陈娟1, 2,赵宏3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 皖西学院 建筑与土木工程系,安徽 六安 237012
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-31 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 作者简介:高广运,男,1961年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学和桩基的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41772288)

Ground vibration attenuation of viaduct and pile-group foundation induced by moving high-speed train

GAO Guang-yun1, 2, XIE Wei1, 2, CHEN Juan1, 2, ZHAO Hong3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, West Anhui University, Liuan, Anhui 237012, China
  • Received:2018-05-31 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772288).

摘要: 采用多质点弹簧-阻尼模型模拟列车,将板式轨道运动学方程引入到桥梁模型中,推导了桥梁振动半解析模型,结合群桩基础模型,建立了列车-轨道-桥梁-桥墩-群桩基础半解析耦合模型。基于傅里叶变换和频域内弹性半空间Green函数求得高铁高架桥群桩基础地面波动场,研究了上软下硬和上硬下软地基环境振动规律,分析了桩径、桩长对地面振动衰减的影响。结果表明:车速较低时,轨道中心处上硬下软地层比上软下硬地层振动大;上软下硬地层,车速较高时因接近表层软土剪切波速而增大地面振动,故应避免车速接近表层土的剪切波速;群桩基础地面振动随桩长和桩径增大而增大,且车速越大地面振动增速越快;桩体具有好的减振效果,群桩范围内地面振动由于几何阻尼和桩体散射作用迅速衰减,且桩径越大振动衰减速度越快,但受桩长影响较小;群桩基础外上硬下软地层比上软下硬地层的地面振动幅度小,表明上硬下软地层减振效果好;合理设计桩基可控制轨道中心处地面振动,并能有效降低高架桥远处的环境振动。

关键词: 高速列车, 高架桥, 群桩基础, 层状地基, 地面振动

Abstract: The train is simulated by a multiple-mass-spring-damper model, and the bridge vibration is solved by incorporating the slab track kinematic equations into the bridge model. Combined with pile-group foundation model, a semi-analytical coupling model of train-rail-bridge-bridge pier-group pile foundation is established. Based on the Fourier transform and the Green function of elastic half-space in the frequency domain, the ground wave field caused by the moving train on viaduct is obtained. The vibration laws of the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground and the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground are studied. Moreover, the effects of pile diameter and pile length on ground vibration attenuation are analyzed. The results show that the vibration of the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground at the center of the track is larger than that of the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground at lower vehicle speed; but the vibration of the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground increases significantly when the vehicle speed is close to the shear wave velocity of the surface soft soil, which indicate that the speed of the train should be avoided to approach the shear wave velocity of the surface soil. The vibration at the center of the track increases with the increase of the pile length and pile diameter, especially when the vehicle speed is large. The pile has a good damping effect, and the ground vibration attenuates rapidly due to the geometric damping and pile scattering effects within the pile-group area. The vibration attenuation speed is faster when the pile diameter is larger, but it is less affected by pile length. The ground vibration amplitude of the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground on the outside of the group pile foundation is smaller than that of the upper soft-layer and lower stiff-layer ground, which indicates that the effect of the upper stiff-layer and lower soft-layer ground on vibration attenuation is better. Rational design of pile foundation can meet the vibration control requirements at the center of the track and effectively reduce the environmental vibration around the viaduct.

Key words: high speed train, viaduct, pile-group foundation, layered foundation, ground vibration

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[2] 张海廷, 杨林青, 郭芳, . 基于SBFEM的层状地基埋置管道动力 响应求解与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[3] 杨苏春, 张明义, 王永洪, 桑松魁, 苗德滋. 基于现场试验的闭口静压管桩贯入 层状地基桩端阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 91-99.
[4] 韩泽军,林 皋,周小文,杨林青. 横观各向同性层状地基动应力响应的求解与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2287-2294.
[5] 艾智勇,张逸帆,王路君, . 层状横观各向同性地基平面应变问题的扩展精细积分解[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1885-1890.
[6] 熊 辉,江雅丰,禹荣霞. 层状地基中基于Laplace变换的桩基横向振动阻抗计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1901-1907.
[7] 周泽林,陈寿根,涂 鹏,张海生, . 基坑开挖对邻近隧道影响的耦合分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1440-1449.
[8] 辛冬冬,张乐文,宿传玺. 基于虚土桩模型的层状地基群桩沉降研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2368-2376.
[9] 肖勇杰,陈福全,林良庆. 灌注桩套管振动贯入引起的地面振动及隔振研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 705-713.
[10] 冯 君,张俊云,朱 明,江 南,. 软土地层高承台桥梁群桩基础横向承载特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 94-104.
[11] 艾智勇 ,张逸帆 , . 墙下条形基础与层状横观各向同性地基共同作用[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1243-1248.
[12] 梁 鑫 ,程谦恭 ,陈建明 ,李良广,. 采空区上方高速铁路桥梁群桩基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1865-1876.
[13] 张治国 ,张孟喜 ,王卫东,. 顶管推进引起施工场地竖向附加荷载分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 121-128.
[14] 伍程杰 ,俞 峰 ,龚晓南 ,林存刚 ,梁荣柱 , . 开挖卸荷对既有群桩竖向承载性状的影响分析[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2602-2608.
[15] 陈功奇 ,高广运 ,蒋建平 . Hyperbola-Logistic模型预测列车引起的地面振动[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 313-317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!