岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3207-3217.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0747

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析

陈 冲1，王卫2，吕华永3   

  1. 1. 清华大学 工程物理系，北京 100084；2. 清华大学 土木水利学院，北京 100084；3. 商丘师范学院 建筑工程学院，河南 商丘 476000
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-28 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 作者简介:陈冲，男，1987年生，博士后，主要从事露天矿边坡稳定性评价与控制方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划（No. 2018YFC1507805）

Stability analysis of slope reinforced with composite anti-slide pile model

CHEN Chong1, WANG Wei2, LÜ Hua-yong3   

  1. 1. Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. School of Architecture and Engineering, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, Henan 476000, China
  • Received:2019-07-28 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1507805).

PDF (Chinese)

296

摘要： 数值分析方法能够同时考虑抗滑桩的受力行为及加固边坡稳定性，是研究抗滑桩加固边坡稳定性的重要手段。但在数值模拟计算中，尚未形成一种建模易、精度高和计算快的抗滑桩数值模拟模型。因此，提出一种复合单元抗滑桩模型，基于该模型系统研究抗滑桩顶部自由和固定约束条件下，不同桩位、间距等设计参数对抗滑桩加固边坡效果的影响以及抗滑桩潜在失效模式，研究结果表明，复合单元抗滑桩模型可以真实地模拟桩的力学性能，计算精度高且计算结果不受单元网格疏密的影响。抗滑桩布置在边坡中部时，加固边坡安全系数最大，越靠近边坡两端，加固边坡安全系数越小。当桩间距 3D时，边坡潜在滑面被分为两个独立部分，桩间土形成明显应力拱，当桩间距 4D时，桩间中心土体塑性剪切带完全贯通，桩间土体形成反向应力拱。桩顶自由和固定约束时，抗滑桩分别布置在边坡中部（ 0.5）和边坡中下部（ 0.3）时，抗滑桩易发生弯曲破坏。研究结果对抗滑桩加固边坡工程设计具有指导意义。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 边坡, 稳定性, 桩位, 间距, 失效判别

Abstract: The numerical analysis method is an important method to study the stability of the slope reinforced with anti-slide pile, which can take both the mechanical behavior of the anti-slide pile and the stability of the slope into consideration at the same time. However, in the previous numerical simulation, it is hard to find a numerical model of the anti-slide pile with easy modeling, high precision and low time cost. Therefore, an anti-slide pile model coupled with the composite solid-structural element is proposed in this study. Based on this model, the influence of design parameters such as pile location and space on the stability of slope reinforced by composite anti-slide pile are studied under the free and fixed constraints of anti-slide pile top. Besides, the potential failure modes of anti-slide pile is also studied. The results show that the proposed model can realistically simulate the mechanical properties of the pile with a high calculation accuracy, and the calculation results are independent on the mesh density. When the anti-slide pile is arranged in the middle of the slope, the safety factor of the reinforced slope reaches to a maximum value. The closer to both ends of the slope, the smaller the safety factor of the reinforced slope. When the pile space is less than 3D, the potential sliding surface of the slope is divided into two independent parts, and the soil between the piles forms an obvious stress arch. When the pile space is larger than 4D, the plastic shear zone of the center soil between the piles completely penetrates, and the soil between the piles forms the reverse stress arch. When the anti-sliding piles are arranged in the middle ( 0.5) and in the lower part of the slope ( 0.3) with the free and fixed constraints in pile top, respectively, the anti-sliding pile is easy to bend and damage. The results have guiding significance for the engineering design of slope reinforced with anti-slide pile.

Key words: anti-slide pile, slope, stability, pile location, pile space, failure discrimination

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[5] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[6] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[7] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[10] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[11] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[12] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[13] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[14] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[15] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发