岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3576-3584.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1143

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

悬索桥隧道锚承载能力和变形特征研究综述

张宜虎,邬爱清,周火明,王帅,罗荣,范雷   

  1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-28 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-06
  • 作者简介:张宜虎,男,1979年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事岩体力学特性及工程技术研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41702319,No.51409013);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(No.CKSF2017024/YT)

Review of bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of tunnel- type anchorage for suspension bridge

ZHANG Yi-hu, WU Ai-qing, ZHOU Huo-ming, WANG Shuai, LUO Rong, FAN Lei   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2018-06-28 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41702319, 51409013) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Institutes of China (CKSF2017024/YT).

摘要: 隧道锚作为悬索桥相对新型的锚固形式,对其理论和实践认知都还比较欠缺。首先从抗拔承载安全和锚碇变形控制两方面归纳了当前隧道锚工程普遍采用的安全控制指标;然后分别总结了隧道锚承载能力和变形特征的研究方法;对项目团队20年来针对10余个隧道锚工程所开展的专题研究成果进行总结,得出目前已建和在建隧道锚在主缆数万吨级荷载下的变形普遍为mm级、隧道锚的超载稳定性系数普遍大于7的结论,说明目前已建和在建隧道锚存在较大安全裕度,隧道锚设计还存在一定优化空间;同时指出目前规范建议的隧道锚变形控制标准是基于桥梁结构提出的,没有考虑锚体自身及围岩等材料对变形的限制要求;总结出隧道锚承载能力主要是锚体混凝土及围岩系统的承载能力,没有考虑钢绞线材料强度等其他可能控制锚碇系统承载能力的因素。研究结论具有其特定条件和适用范围,后续对隧道锚系统的承载机制等科学问题还有待进一步研究。

关键词: 悬索桥, 隧道锚, 承载能力, 变形特征

Abstract: Currently, there is a lack of information on the theory and practice of the relatively new tunnel-type anchorage for suspension bridges. Firstly, the safety control indexes commonly used in tunnel anchorage engineering are summarized from two aspects of anti-draw bearing safety and anchorage deformation control. Then the research methods are analyzed for the bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of tunnel-type anchorage, respectively. Finally, the achievements of more than 10 tunnel anchor projects in the project team for the past 20 years are summarized. It is concluded that the deformation of the existing and under construction tunnel-type anchorages are generally in the order of millimeters, and the overload stability coefficient of the anchorage is usually greater than seven under tens of thousands of tons load of the main cable. It shows that the existing and under construction tunnel-type anchorages have a sufficient safety margin, and the design of tunnel-type anchorage can be optimized to a certain extent. At the same time, it is pointed out that the current proposed deformation control standard of tunnel anchor is based on the bridge structure and does not take into account the restrictions on the deformation of materials such as anchor body itself and surrounding rock. The bearing capacity of tunnel anchorage summarized in this paper is mainly from the bearing capacity of anchor concrete and surrounding rock system, without considering from other factors such as the strength of steel strand material. The conclusions in this paper have their specific conditions and scope of application, and further research on the bearing mechanism of tunnel anchor system is required.

Key words: suspension bridge, tunnel-type anchorage, bearing capacity, deformation characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU470
[1] 吴兴征, 王瑞凯, 辛军霞, . 特定场地下土工构筑物的几何可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2070-2080.
[2] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[3] 刘健, 朱赵辉, 吴浩, 张石磊, 王晋明, . 超大型地下洞室高边墙围岩变形影响特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4030-4040.
[4] 董志宏, 钮新强, 丁秀丽, 翁永红, 黄书岭, 裴启涛, 张 练, . 乌东德左岸地下厂房洞室群施工期 围岩变形特征及反馈分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[5] 熊晓荣,汤 华,廖明进,尹小涛,王东英, . 隧道锚“楔形效应”的室内模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 181-190.
[6] 杨 琪,张友谊,刘华强,秦 华,. 一种气泡轻质土路基受载-破坏模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3121-3129.
[7] 翟明磊,郭保华,李冰洋,焦 峰,. 岩石节理分级剪切加载-蠕变-卸载的能量与变形特征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2865-2872.
[8] 王 春, 唐礼忠, 程露萍, 陈 源, 刘 涛, 韦永恒, . 高轴压和围压共同作用下矽卡岩受频繁动态扰动时的动力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4537-4546.
[9] 邓 琴,汤 华,吴振君,尹小涛,袁从华,. 隧道锚–围岩系统承载特性的室内模型试验及畸变纠正[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 247-254.
[10] 张强勇,张龙云,向 文,江力宇,丁炎志,. 考虑温度效应的片麻状花岗岩三轴蠕变试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2507-2514.
[11] 胡卫东,曹文贵,袁青松,. 基于非线性破坏准则的临坡地基承载力上限分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1639-1646.
[12] 张奇华,李玉婕,余美万,罗 荣,邬爱清. 隧道锚围岩抗拔机制及抗拔力计算模式初步研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 810-820.
[13] 安 鹏,张爱军,邢义川,倪万魁,张 博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[14] 彭 帅,张希巍,冯夏庭,蔡 明, . 等向压缩及偏压加载下锦屏大理岩变形特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3532-3539.
[15] 程建龙,杨圣奇,潘玉丛,田文岭,赵维生,. 挤压地层双护盾TBM围岩变形及应力场特征研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 371-380.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!