岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 4030-4040.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0310

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超大型地下洞室高边墙围岩变形影响特性研究

刘健1, 2,朱赵辉1,吴浩1,张石磊1,王晋明2   

  1. 1. 中国水利水电科学研究院,北京 100048;2. 雅砻江流域水电开发有限公司,四川 成都 610051
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-30 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 朱赵辉,男,1981年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事水工结构安全监控理论与方法等方面的研究。E-mail: zzhtbb@163.com E-mail: liujian_iwhr@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘健,男,1993年生,硕士,主要从事地下工程安全监测及围岩稳定评价方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划) (No. 2013CB035900);国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0600702)。

Study of deformation characteristics of the high sidewall surrounding rock in super large underground caverns

LIU Jian1, 2, ZHU Zhao-hui1, WU Hao1, ZHANG Shi-lei1, WANG Jin-ming2   

  1. 1.China Institude of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China; 2. Yalong River Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China
  • Received:2019-01-30 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2013CB035900) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0600702).

摘要: 高边墙围岩稳定是超大型地下洞室施工期关注的重点。基于工程监测资料,探究了白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房高边墙围岩变形演化分布规律及破坏机制。研究表明:在垂直方向上,开挖面距离在10 m范围内边墙卸荷响应强烈,该阶段围岩变形约占总变形量的50%~55%;在洞轴方向上,开挖影响集中在2倍洞跨范围内,该区域内变形约占总变形量的97%;在结构面发育部位前后围岩变形的分异量较大,且由于软弱夹层的柔塑性,围压解除后错动带应变能释放是一个缓慢的过程,时效剪切特征明显;发掘并总结逐层下挖过程中高边墙围岩应力状态的演化规律,并划分为应变能积聚、释放、应力调整及趋稳4个阶段。该研究成果可为工程支护设计提供一定支撑,并供同类工程参考。

关键词: 层间错动带, 地下厂房, 变形特征, 白鹤滩水电站

Abstract: The stability of the surrounding rock of the high sidewall draws great attention during the construction of the super large underground cavern. Based on geological conditions, geophysical prospecting, monitoring data and construction materials, the deformation evolution mechanism, spatial distribution pattern and failure mode of the surrounding rock are analyzed by using rock mechanics theory and FLAC3D numerical simulation. The research shows that in the vertical direction, the unloading response of the surrounding rock under 10 m of the excavation surface is intense. The surrounding rock deformation accounts for 50%-55% of the total deformation during this period. In the axial direction of the cavern, the influence area by excavation is concentrated in the range of twice the span of cavern, and the displacement increment caused by excavation takes up about 97% of the total unloading displacement change. The difference in the deformation of the surrounding rock is large at different depths due to the geological structural surface. Because of the soft plasticity of the weak interlayer, the strain energy release after the confining pressure is a slow process, and the aging shearing characteristics are obvious. During the layer-by-layer excavation process, the stress state of the surrounding rock in high sidewalls has undergone four stages: the accumulation of strain energy, stress release, stress adjustment, and stree stabilization. These research results provide significant references for similar projects.

Key words: interlayer staggered zones, underground powerhouse, deformation characteristics, Baihetan hydropower station

中图分类号: 

  • TV 74
[1] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[2] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[3] 张宜虎, 邬爱清, 周火明, 王帅, 罗荣, 范雷. 悬索桥隧道锚承载能力和变形特征研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3576-3584.
[4] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[5] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[6] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[7] 崔 琦, 侯建国, 宋一乐. 抽水蓄能电站地下厂房围岩约束 及结构振动特性分析 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 809-817.
[8] 蒋 雄, 徐奴文, 周 钟, 侯东奇, 李 昂, 张 敏, . 两河口水电站母线洞开挖过程围岩破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 305-314.
[9] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周 钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征 及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[10] 董志宏, 钮新强, 丁秀丽, 翁永红, 黄书岭, 裴启涛, 张 练, . 乌东德左岸地下厂房洞室群施工期 围岩变形特征及反馈分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[11] 郑进修,张建海,高克静. 地下厂房支护措施经验回归及支护强度判据[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 303-310.
[12] 杨 琪,张友谊,刘华强,秦 华,. 一种气泡轻质土路基受载-破坏模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3121-3129.
[13] 翟明磊,郭保华,李冰洋,焦 峰,. 岩石节理分级剪切加载-蠕变-卸载的能量与变形特征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2865-2872.
[14] 杨 莹,徐奴文,李 韬,戴 峰,樊义林,徐 剑,李 彪,. 基于RFPA3D和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2193-2202.
[15] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!