岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 3783-3788.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0290

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

成样方法对饱和粉砂不同应力路径下固结 排水剪切试验结果的影响

郭莹,刘晓东   

  1. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-19
  • 作者简介:郭莹,女,1963年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土力学试验与海洋土力学、土动力学等方面的科学研究以及土力学与基础工程相关的教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51639002, No. 51879036)和国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2018YFC0309203)

Influence of sample-preparing methods on CD test results of saturated silty sand in different stress paths

GUO Ying, LIU Xiao-dong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51639002, 51879036) and the Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC0309203).

摘要: 利用应力控制式静力三轴仪,采用干装法和湿装法制备相对密实度50%的饱和粉砂试样,在平均主应力增大(CTC)、不变(TC)、减小(RTC)3种应力路径条件下进行了固结排水剪切试验(CD试验),获得了应力-应变关系、体应变规律以及抗剪强度指标。探讨了实验室常用的干装和湿装两种成样方法对于饱和粉砂试样的不同应力路径的试验结果的影响。试验结果表明:在3种应力路径条件下,干装样均呈应变软化和剪胀现象,而湿装样基本呈应变硬化和剪缩现象;干装样的主应力差峰值均大于湿装样,主应力差峰值的差异最大的是CTC路径;干装法制备试样在RTC路径的剪胀性最强,TC路径次之,CTC路径最弱;干装样的有效内摩擦角均明显高于湿装样;成样方法相同时,CTC路径与RTC路径获得的有效内摩擦角非常接近,TC路径与RTC路径获得的有效内摩擦角亦比较接近。应力路径对试样的有效内摩擦角的影响远小于成样方法的影响。

关键词: 成样方法, 应力路径, 饱和粉砂, 固结排水剪切, 剪胀性

Abstract: Consolidate drained shear tests were carried out on saturated natural silty sand using stress-controlled static triaxial shear apparatus. The samples of 50% relative denseness were prepared using dry-tamping method and wet-tamping method while the consolidation drained shear tests were carried out in three kinds of stress path conditions of CTC, TC and RTC. The experimental results of stress-strain relationship, volumetric strain rule and shear strength indexes were obtained, and the influence of sample-preparing methods on experimental results was studied. The results shows that, in three different stress paths, the samples of dry-tamping method have strain softening and shear dilatation phenomenon, while the samples of wet-tamping method have strain hardening and shear contraction phenomenon. The peak values of principal stress difference from dry-tamping method are all higher than those of wet-tamping method, and the difference between peak values of two sampling methods under CTC is larger than others. The dilatancy of samples under RTC is the most obvious, CTC is the least, and TC is between them. All of the effective internal friction angles obtained from dry-tamping method are bigger than those obtained from wet-tamping method. In the same sample-preparing method, the effective internal friction angle of CTC is almost the same as it of RTC, and at the same time, the angle of TC is relatively close with that of RTC. The influence of stress path on effective internal friction angle is much less than that of sample-preparing methods.

Key words: sample-preparing methods, stress path, saturated silty sand, CD test, dilatancy

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[3] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[4] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[5] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[6] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[7] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率 效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
[8] 包小华, 廖志广, 徐长节, 庞小朝, 谢雄耀, 崔宏志, . 不同渗流边界条件下粉砂边坡失稳模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3789-3796.
[9] 王 军, 胡惠丽, 刘飞禹, 蔡袁强, . 粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.
[10] 张坤勇,李 威,Charkley Nai Frederick,陈 恕,. 小主应力方向加载条件下的掺砾黏土真三轴试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3270-3276.
[11] 陈 敦,马 巍,王大雁,穆彦虎,雷乐乐,王永涛,周志伟,蔡 聪, . 定向剪切应力路径下冻结黏土变形特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2483-2490.
[12] 徐 筱,赵成刚, . 高吸力下黏性土的抗剪强度和体变特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1598-1611.
[13] 朱顺然,徐 超,丁金华,. 土工织物-砂土界面的叠环式剪切试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1775-1780.
[14] 周 辉,姜 玥,卢景景,胡大伟,张传庆,陈 珺,李 震, . 岩石空心圆柱扭剪仪试验能力[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1917-1922.
[15] 周 辉,姜 玥,卢景景,胡大伟,张传庆,陈 珺,李 震, . 岩石空心圆柱扭剪试验系统研制[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1535-1542.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!