岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4259-4269.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0133

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土介质注浆渗透扩散试验与加固机制研究

沙飞,李术才,林春金,刘人太,张庆松,杨磊,李召峰   

  1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-21 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-11-13
  • 通讯作者: 林春金,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事裂隙岩体力学特性及水害治理方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail:linchunjin@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:shafei@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:沙飞,男,1987年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地下工程灾害控制材料、理论及工程治理方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFC0801604);国家自然科学基金青年项目(No. 51909140);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No. 2018M642658)。

Research on penetration grouting diffusion experiment and reinforcement mechanism for sandy soil porous media

SHA Fei, LI Shu-cai, LIN Chun-jin, LIU Ren-tai, ZHANG Qing-song, YANG Lei, LI Zhao-feng   

  1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-11-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801604), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51909140) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642658).

摘要: 设计了一套可视化砂土介质恒压注浆渗透扩散与加固模拟试验装置。选用普通硅酸盐42.5水泥(OPC)、超细硅酸盐水泥(MC)、超细硫铝水泥(MSAC)及自主研发材料(EMCG),对砂土多孔介质进行了注浆渗透扩散与加固试验。研究了细砂土体不同浆液、注浆压力工况下扩散距离、注浆量随时间变化规律,以及不同浆液、砂样级配及注浆压力对加固效果影响。采用极差分析法确定了加固效果主控因素,获得了加固体宏观破坏模式,通过SEM分析了岩-浆界面微观加固模型,揭示了不同材料加固效果差异的本质原因。研究结果表明:注浆材料与颗粒质量分数主导着细砂土体可注性,注浆压力对可注性提高程度不大,EMCG可注性最强,MC、MSAC次之,OPC最差;在完全可注情况下,砂样级配越细,加固体强度改善效果越明显;EMCG材料加固体7、28 d强度明显高于MSAC、MC、OPC加固体;EMCG的7 d加固体强度达到28 d参数70%以上;注浆材料主导着注浆加固效果,EMCG对不同级配砂土体注浆加固效果显著优于其他水泥类材料,OPC最差;注浆后EMCG浆-岩界面生成的致密C-S-H凝胶体能够有效提高胶结强度。最后从注浆材料选型、注浆过程控制、钻孔布置方面对砂土层渗透注浆设计方法提出了工程治理改进建议。

关键词: 砂土多孔介质, 注浆模拟试验, 渗透扩散, 注浆材料, 加固效果, 岩-浆加固机制

Abstract: A novel visualizing constant pressure penetration grouting diffusion and reinforcement simulation test device was designed. The ordinary Portland cement 42.5 (OPC), microfine Portland cement (MC), microfine sulphoaluminate cement (MSAC), and self-developed effective microfine cement-based grout (EMCG) were selected, and the penetration grouting diffusion and reinforcement test has been performed. The variation rules of diffusion distance and volume under different suspension and grouting pressures were studied, as well as the effects of grouting material, pressure and sand gradation on the reinforcement. The ANOVA method was adopted to determine the dominant factor for grouting effectiveness, and the macroscopic failure modes of reinforcement specimens were obtained. The microscopic reinforcement model of rock-slurry interface and mineral characteristic were analyzed through SEM method, and the core reasons of reinforcement differences caused by different grouts were revealed. The results show that the grouting material and particle percent in slurry were the dominant factors for the groutability of fine sandy stratum, the increase of groutability was not evident with the increase of grouting pressure. The groutability of EMCG slurry was the best, followed by MC and MSAC, and the groutability of OPC slurry was the worst. The strength improvement of reinforcement specimen was better when the sand gradation was finer when suspensions penetrated fully. The 7 d and 28 d strengths of EMCG reinforcement specimen are higher than those of MSAC, MC and OPC, the 7 d of strength of EMCG reinforcement specimen is greater than 70% value of its 28 d strength. The grout is the dominant factor for reinforcement effectiveness, and EMCG is the best while OPC is the worst. After grouting, the dense C-S-H gels produced in EMCG rock-slurry interface can enhance its bonding strength effectively. Finally, improvement suggestions for practical penetration grouting design have been put forward based on three aspects, which are grouts selection, grouting dynamic control and drilling holes layout.

Key words: porous media of sandy soil, grouting simulation test, penetration diffusion, grouts, reinforcement effectiveness, rock - slurry reinforcement mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TU 502
[1] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[2] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[3] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[4] 史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压 实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[5] 乐慧琳,孙少锐. 注浆材料和预制裂纹缺陷角度对类岩石试件单轴抗压强度及破坏模式的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 211-219.
[6] 张 聪,梁经纬,张 箭,阳军生,张贵金,叶新田,. 基于脉动注浆的宾汉流体渗透扩散机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[7] 李召峰,李术才,刘人太,蒋宇静,张庆松, 杨 磊,沙 飞,陈泊涵,王宏亮,. 富水破碎岩体注浆加固材料试验研究与应用[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1937-1946.
[8] 杨志全 ,牛向东 ,侯克鹏 ,周宗红 ,梁 维 ,郭延辉 ,程 涌 ,杨八九,. 砾石土层中注浆扩散参数的研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 397-402.
[9] 张庆松 ,张连震 ,刘人太 ,韩伟伟 ,朱明听 ,李相辉 ,郑东柱 ,徐咸辉,. 水泥-水玻璃浆液裂隙注浆扩散的室内试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2159-2168.
[10] 陈东方 ,冯夏庭 ,徐鼎平 ,江 权 ,刘国锋 ,简崇林,. 砂浆锚杆加固效果的等效数值模拟方法研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1195-1204.
[11] 杨宝全 ,陈 媛 ,张 林 ,董建华 ,陈建叶 , . 基于地质力学模型试验的锦屏拱坝坝肩加固效果研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 819-826.
[12] 郑 轩 ,孔令伟,. 连续桩键结构的抗滑机制及加固效果研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2616-2622.
[13] 武亚军,杨建波,张孟喜. 真空加载方式对吹填流泥加固效果及土颗粒移动的影响研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2129-2135.
[14] 章定文,韩文君,刘松玉,杜广印. 劈裂真空法加固软土地基的效果分析[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1467-1472.
[15] 陈新泽. 基于FLAC3D预应力锚拉桩作用机制和加固效果研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 499-504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!