岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 813-822.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1551

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析

郎瑞卿1,杨爱武1, 2,闫澍旺3   

  1. 1. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384;2. 东华大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 201620; 3. 天津城建大学 土木工程学院,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-09 修回日期:2020-01-20 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 杨爱武,男,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事软黏土力学性质及土体微观结构的研究工作。E-mail: tulilab@163.com E-mail:tculrq@163.com
  • 作者简介:郎瑞卿,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地基处理等工作
  • 基金资助:
    天津市自然科学基金项目(No.19JCQNJC06900,No.19JCZDJC39700);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978440)。

Analysis of consolidation properties of rigid pile composite foundation based on modified equal strain assumption

LANG Rui-qing1, YANG Ai-wu1, 2, YAN Shu-wang3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Engineering Character and Engineering Environment of Tianjin, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; 2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2019-09-09 Revised:2020-01-20 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China(19JCQNJC06900, 19JCZDJC39700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51978440).

摘要: 刚性桩复合地基固结特性是影响工程进度的重要因素。为研究外荷载作用下刚性桩复合地基固结特性,结合刚性桩和桩间土应力?应变特点对等应变假定进行修正。在此基础之上,考虑涂抹效应、桩间土和下卧层土体固结特性的影响,推导得到桩间土和下卧层土体固结微分方程。基于双层地基固结理论,考虑单级匀速施加荷载和附加应力沿深度变化等边界条件,推导得到其固结度解析解。最后,利用数值模拟方法对解析解进行验证,并对影响刚性桩复合地基固结特性的因素进行分析。结果表明:理论计算与数值模拟结果较为吻合;刚性桩复合地基固结速率受到贯入比影响较大,当贯入比较小时,与天然地基相比,其固结速率较小,贯入比较大且桩端阻力系数较小时,复合地基固结速率大于天然地基;随着贯入比、桩?土相对刚度和垫层?土体相对刚度的增大,复合地基整体固结速率加快;随着置换率的增大,复合地基整体固结速率降低。

关键词: 刚性桩复合地基, 修正等应变假定, 固结特性, 变附加应力, 下卧层

Abstract: The consolidation characteristics of rigid pile composite foundation is a key factor affecting the progress of the project. To study the consolidation properties of rigid pile composite foundation under external load, the equal strain assumption was modified based on stress-strain characteristics of rigid pile and its surrounding soil. Considering the smearing effect, the consolidation behavior of surrounding soil and underlying stratum, the governing equations for the average excess pore water pressure within the surrounding soil and the underlying soil were developed. According to the boundary conditions of a time-dependent loading and additional stress varied with time and depth, the analytic solutions of consolidation degree were derived based on the consolidation theory of double-layered ground. The proposed method was validated by numerical simulation method. The factors that affect consolidation properties were systematically analyzed. It shows that the analytical solutions have great agreement with the numerical simulation results. The average consolidation rate strongly depends on the penetration ratio of the rigid pile. The average consolidation rate is slower than that of natural ground when the ratio is small. The average consolidation rate of rigid pile composite foundation with a greater penetration ratio and a smaller pile end resistance coefficient is faster than that of natural ground. With the increase of pile penetration ratio, the ratio of the constrained modulus of the pile to that of the soil and the ratio of the constrained modulus of the cushion layer to that of the soil, the overall consolidation rate of the composite foundation is accelerated. With the increase of the replacement rate, the overall consolidation rate of the composite foundation decreases.

Key words: rigid pile composite foundation, modified equal strain assumption, consolidation characteristic, stress varied with depth, underlying stratum

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 叶梓, 艾智勇, . 变荷载下层状非饱和土地基全耦合固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 135-142.
[2] 加瑞, 雷华阳, . 有明黏土各向异性固结特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2231-2238.
[3] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[4] 陆清元,罗 强,蒋良潍, . 路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2473-2482.
[5] 姜文雨, 刘 一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[6] 王惠昌,王 斌,蒋仁贵,王彩莲,张 华,. 用桩顶垫层压缩量法计算刚性桩复合地基最大沉降量[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 442-448.
[7] 杨 涛 ,杨 欢 ,阮一舟 ,李国维,. 变荷载下不排水桩复合地基桩间土和下卧层土固结分析[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 323-330.
[8] 杨光华 ,范 泽 ,姜 燕 ,张玉成 , . 刚性桩复合地基沉降计算的简化方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 76-84.
[9] 雷华阳 ,李 宾 ,仇王维 ,卢海滨 ,任 倩,. 吹填场区软黏土地基的次固结特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 120-124.
[10] 佟建兴,闫明礼,王明山,孙训海,杨新辉. 刚性桩复合地基侧向土压力试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1572-1578.
[11] 盛桂琳 ,鲍 鹏 ,苏彩丽 ,刘德辉 . 刚性桩复合地基桩体抗震性能分析[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1274-1278.
[12] 王奎华 ,吕述晖 ,吴文兵 ,罗永健 ,武登辉 . 考虑应力扩散时桩端土性对单桩沉降影响分析方法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 621-630.
[13] 韩小雷 ,肖成安 ,英峻豪 . 地震作用下复合地基-筏板-上部结构相互作用体系的动力弹塑性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 762-768.
[14] 梁耀哲. 刚性桩复合地基的主动土压力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 25-29.
[15] 亓 乐 ,刘 薇 ,孙长帅 ,张 勇 . 考虑下卧层特性的复合地基荷载传递规律模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 123-128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 雷金波,陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[6] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[7] 樊恒辉,高建恩,吴普特,娄宗科. 水泥基土壤固化剂固化土的物理化学作用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3741 -3745 .
[8] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[9] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[10] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .