岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 41-50.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1119

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道突涌水灾害防突厚度计算方法及适用性评价

李利平1, 2,朱宇泽1,周宗青1, 2,石少帅1, 2,陈雨雪1,屠文锋1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南 250061;2. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-23 修回日期:2019-10-18 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-04
  • 作者简介:李利平,男,1981年生,博士,教授、博士生导师,主要从事地下工程灾害与控制方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51679131);山东省自然科学基金项目(No.ZR2014EEM019);国家优秀青年科学基金项目(No.51722904);山东省杰出青年基金项目(No.JQ201611);山东省重点研发计划(No.2017GSF220014)。

Calculation methods of rock thickness for preventing water inrush in tunnels and their applicability evaluation

LI Li-ping1, 2, ZHU Yu-ze1, ZHOU Zong-qing1, 2, SHI Shao-shuai1, 2, CHEN Yu-xue1, TU Wen-feng1   

  1. 1. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China; 2. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2019-06-23 Revised:2019-10-18 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51679131), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2014EEM019), the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars(51722904), the Shandong Provincial Science Foundation for Outstanding Scholarship, China(JQ201611), and the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Project, China(2017GSF220014).

摘要: 将10余种常见的突涌水灾害防突厚度计算方法分类归纳,并与隔水岩体破坏和充填结构失稳两大类突涌水灾害类型对应统一。对于隔水岩体破坏型突涌水,按照力学模型和适用对象的不同将计算公式归类划分为完整岩体型与裂隙岩体型两类,改进了裂隙岩体三区模型的最小安全厚度计算公式,对比了不同工况下各个公式的计算结果,表明适用于完整岩体的三维岩柱剪切模型和适用于裂隙岩体的单裂纹扩展三区模型与工程经验公式一致性较好,具有更好的准确性和适用性。对于充填结构失稳型突涌水,颗粒受力启动适合于作为充填介质渗透失稳开始的标志,流体流态转变可作为失稳发生的临界判别标准。最后,文中对理论分析、数值模拟、模型试验与工程类比等方法的适用条件、判断标准与优缺点做了系统的评价,可为实际工程中监控物理量的选择、临灾状态的识别与灾害预警提供参考。

关键词: 突涌水灾害类型, 隔水岩体破坏, 充填结构失稳, 最小安全厚度, 适用性评价

Abstract: In this paper, more than ten kinds of common inrush water disaster prevention methods are classified and summarised by comprehensively considering the geological conditions and theoretical analysis models. These prevention methods are further unified with two types of inrush water disasters for water-damage rock mass failure and filling structure instability. For the water-breaking rock mass destruction type water inrush, the calculation formulas are classified according to the mechanical model and its applicable objects, and the minimum safe thickness calculation formula of the single crack extended three-zone model is improved. By comparing the calculation results of each formula under different working conditions, the results show that the three-dimensional (3D) rock-column shear model applicable to the intact rock and the single crack extended three-zone model applicable to the fractured rock mass are consistent with the empirical formula, which proves high accuracy and applicability. In terms of the unstable water inrush type of filling structure, it should be pointed out that the start-up force analysis of particles is suitable for judging the beginning of the seepage instability of the filling media and the fluid flow transition can be used as the critical criterion for the occurrence of seepage failure. Finally, this paper systematically evaluates the applicable conditions, judgment criteria, advantages and disadvantages of theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, model tests and engineering analogy. The results provide guidance and reference for the selection of monitoring objects, identification of disaster status and disaster warning in engineering projects.

Key words: types of water inrush, failure of water-resisting rock, failure of filling media, applicability evaluation, the minimum safe thickness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 445
[1] 赵明华,朱志仁,黄明华,杨超炜,徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[2] 李术才 ,林 鹏 ,许振浩 ,李利平 ,郭 明 ,. 基于条分法原理的充填型岩溶蓄水构造突水突泥最小安全厚度[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1989-1994.
[3] 韩琳琳,廖凤琴,蒋小权,陈剑文. 盐岩储气库适用性评价标准的研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 564-568.
[4] 孙 谋,刘维宁. 高风险岩溶隧道掌子面突水机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1175-1180.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!