岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1815-1827.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1724

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静力触探试验的宏细观耦合分析方法与应用

王长虹,汤道飞,王昆,吴昭欣   

  1. 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院土木工程系,上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-18 修回日期:2021-04-30 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 作者简介:王长虹,男,1978年生,博士研究生,副教授,主要从事随机岩土力学的研究
  • 基金资助:
    上海高校特聘教授岗位计划(No. TP2018042);上海市浦江人才计划(No. 18PJ1403900)。

Macro and micro coupling analysis method and application of cone penetration test

WANG Chang-hong, TANG Dao-fei, WANG Kun, WU Zhao-xin   

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, School of Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:2020-11-18 Revised:2021-04-30 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Shanghai University Distinguished Professor Position Plan (TP2018042) and Shanghai Pujiang Talent Plan (18PJ1403900).

摘要: 圆锥静力触探试验(CPT)是一种准确获取常规岩土参数的土工原位测试方法,但是CPT数据一般不能直接转化为岩土力学宏观本构模型参数(即一类精细的岩土参数),根本原因是对宏细观贯入机制的研究不足。以Mohr-Coulomb屈服准则的圆柱(锥)孔扩张理论为基础,建立静力触探试验过程的宏细观耦合分析方法。根据圆柱(锥)孔扩张理论求解极限扩孔应力,推导了锥尖阻力、侧摩阻力与极限扩孔应力之间的关系。以上海地区浅部持力层第②1粉质黏土为对象,通过相同尺度的三轴压缩试验,建立宏观Mohr-Coulomb理想弹塑性模型参数与细观线性平行黏结模型参数的转化公式,并通过Fish语言编入到FLAC3D软件。以上海第②1层粉质黏土和第⑤1-1层灰色黏土为对象,验证了宏细观转化公式对于上海黏土或者粉质黏土的适用性。以第②1层粉质黏土为对象,从宏观的角度分析锥尖阻力、侧摩阻力和极限扩孔应力的理论解、数值解与实测值的误差,从细观角度分析土体颗粒位移和接触力链分布。圆柱(锥)孔扩张理论计算的极限扩孔应力、锥尖阻力和侧摩阻力与实测值的误差分别为1.30%、0.45%和0.77%。宏细观耦合数值计算得到的极限扩孔应力、锥尖阻力、侧摩阻力和孔隙水压力与实测值的误差分别为9.68%、2.99%、9.34%和8.42%。宏细观耦合数值的计算结果不仅和圆柱(锥)孔扩张理论的计算结果以及实测值接近,还能考虑孔隙水压力的作用。以上研究为认识静力触探试验机制,获取岩土力学本构模型参数提供了宏细观耦合分析方法和基础。

关键词: 静力触探试验, 孔扩理论, 宏细观力学, 耦合分析

Abstract: Cone penetration test (CPT) is an in-situ test method to obtain common geotechnical parameters accurately, but CPT data cannot be directly converted into macro constitutive model parameters (i.e., a type of fine geotechnical parameters). The principal reason is that there is insufficient research on the macro and micro penetration mechanism. Based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion of cylindrical (cone) cavity expansion theory, a macro and micro coupling numerical calculation method for the CPT process is established. Firstly, based on the cavity expansion theory, the limit pressure in expansion is solved, and the relationship between the cone resistance, sleeve friction and the limit expansion stress are derived. Secondly, taking the ②1 silty clay of the shallow bearing layer as the research object in Shanghai, through the same scale triaxial compression tests, the conversion formula of the geotechnical parameters in the macro finite element with micro discrete element coupling calculation is established, the formula is calibrated by ②1 silty and ⑤1-1 gray clay. Finally, taking the ②1 silty clay as the research object, the error of the theoretical solution, numerical solution and measurements of cone resistance, sleeve friction and limit pressure in expansion of cylindrical cavity are analyzed from a macro perspective. Soil particle deformation and contact force chain are analyzed from the micro perspective. The errors of the limit pressure of expansion, cone resistance and sleeve friction calculated using the theoretical method are 1.30%, 0.45% and 0.77%, respectively. The errors of the limit pressure in expansion, cone resistance, sleeve friction and pore water pressure calculated by the macro and micro coupling method are 9.68%, 2.99%, 9.19% and 8.42%, respectively. The results of the macro and micro coupling numerical calculation are not only close to the results of the cylindrical (cone) cavity expansion theory, but also considering the effect of pore water pressure. Above research provides a macro and micro coupling numerical method for simulating the CPT mechanism and obtaining the parameters of the specific constitutive model.

Key words: cone penetration test, cavity expansion theory, macro and micro mechanics, coupling analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 446
[1] 蒋中明, 刘澧源, 赵海斌, 唐 栋, 胡 炜, 梅松华, 李 鹏, . 地下储气库热力耦合数值分析动态边界条件研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[2] 周泽林,陈寿根,涂 鹏,张海生, . 基坑开挖对邻近隧道影响的耦合分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1440-1449.
[3] 刘 笋,蒋明镜,付 昌,朱俊高,. 结构性砂土静力触探试验离散元分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 933-942.
[4] 冯 帆,李夕兵,李地元,陈 冲. 基于有限元/离散元耦合分析方法的含预制裂隙圆形孔洞试样破坏特性数值分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 337-348.
[5] 董 林,王兰民,夏 坤,袁晓铭,. 基于台湾集集地震数据的CPT与SPT液化判别方法比较[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3643-3648.
[6] 田 密,李典庆,曹子君,方国光,王 宇,. 基于贝叶斯理论的土性参数空间变异性量化方法[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3355-3362.
[7] 熊勇林,朱合华,叶冠林,叶 斌,. 降雨入渗引起非饱和土边坡破坏的水-土-气三相渗流-变形耦合有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 284-290.
[8] 薛海斌,党发宁,尹小涛,丁卫华,刘海伟,. 非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土质边坡稳定性的矢量和分析法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 49-56.
[9] 艾智勇 ,蔡建邦 , . 层状地基上弹性地基梁的有限元-边界元耦合分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 685-688.
[10] 邹海峰,蔡国军,刘松玉,林 军. 基于地质统计学方法的孔压静力触探锥尖阻力固有空间变异性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 403-407.
[11] 储 亚 ,刘松玉 ,蔡国军 ,  . 原位贯入装置标定罐模型试验研究与发展[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 452-458.
[12] 蒋明镜 ,戴永生 ,王新新 ,王 闯 ,吴晓峰 , . 一种静力触探模型箱试验装置的研制及其试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 2109-2117.
[13] 吴创周 ,杨林德 ,刘成学 ,李 鹏 . 各向异性岩应力-渗流耦合问题的反分析[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1156-1162.
[14] 蒋明镜 ,王新新 . 不同重力场下静力触探试验离散元数值分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 863-873.
[15] 张玉军 ,徐 刚 ,杨朝帅 . 应力腐蚀和压力溶解引起的裂隙开度-刚度变化对THMM耦合过程影响的数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 559-567.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[2] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[3] 贾 强,张 鑫,应惠清. 桩基础托换开发地下空间不均匀沉降的数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3500 -3504 .
[4] 贾剑青,王宏图,刘大鹏,安龙奇. 隧洞地表稳定性监测及计算分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3765 -3770 .
[5] 顾强康,李 宁,黄文广. 机场高填土地基工后不均匀沉降指标研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3865 -3870 .
[6] 李廷春,吕海波,王 辉. 单轴压缩载荷作用下双裂隙扩展的CT扫描试验[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 9 -14 .
[7] 木林隆,黄茂松,龚维明,殷永高. 水平荷载作用下根式基础受力特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 287 -292 .
[8] 王星运,陈善雄,余 飞,周 博. 曲线拟合法对路基小变形情形适用性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2763 -2769 .
[9] 张宜虎,周火明,邬爱清. 结构面网络模拟结果后处理研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2855 -2861 .
[10] 王秋生,王玉杰,张 波,李 亮. 一个基于热力学的土体本构模型[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 350 -354 .