岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1170-1180.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1796

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

浅埋无中导洞连拱隧道先行洞衬砌承担围岩荷载确定方法

汤华1,姜成业1, 2,邓琴1,毕钛俊1, 2,秦雨樵1   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-27 接受日期:2024-01-02 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 邓琴,女,1983年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事工程岩体稳定性分析方面的研究。E-mail:qdeng@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:汤华,男,1978年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究。E-mail: htang@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    云南省交通运输厅科技创新及示范项目(云交科教[2019]79号)。

A method for determining surrounding rock load borne by antecedence tunnel lining of shallowly buried double-arch tunnel without middle drift

TANG Hua1, JIANG Cheng-ye1, 2, DENG Qin1, BI Tai-jun1, 2, QIN Yu-qiao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2023-11-27 Accepted:2024-01-02 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Yunnan Provincial Department of Transportation ([2019]79).

摘要: 不同于常规隧道衬砌结构,无中导洞连拱隧道先行洞衬砌施作稳定后还要受到邻近后行洞开挖的二次扰动,后行洞开挖对先行洞衬砌受力的影响不可忽视。依托杨家寨公路隧道工程,基于考虑了后行洞开挖影响的隧道围岩压力计算方法,结合现场监测位移数据采用荷载-结构法进行位移反分析,提出了一种确定浅埋无中导洞连拱隧道先行洞衬砌承担围岩荷载的方法,最后和衬砌背后围岩荷载现场监测值进行对比验证。研究结果表明:后行洞开挖对先行洞衬砌承担围岩荷载的影响较为显著,监测点增长幅度均值高达142%;先行洞衬砌受力呈现“拱腰较小,拱顶及拱肩较大”的分布规律,且靠近后行洞一侧拱肩位置受力最大;通过现场监测位移反分析得到的先行洞衬砌受力结果和现场监测结果较为一致,论证了该方法的合理性和实用性,研究成果可为无中导洞连拱隧道结构设计提供参考。

关键词: 荷载结构法, 无中导洞连拱隧道, 位移反分析, 衬砌受力

Abstract: Unlike conventional tunnel lining structures, the antecedence tunnel lining is subject to secondary disturbances from the later excavated tunnel excavation after the lining has been stabilized. The excavation impact of the later excavated tunnel on the surrounding rock pressure acting on the antecedence tunnel lining cannot be ignored. Relying on Yangjiazhai tunnel project, a calculation method for surrounding rock pressure that accounts for the influence of the second tunnel excavation has been developed. This method, in combination with on-site monitoring displacement data and utilizing the load-structure method for inverse analysis, proposes a means of determining the load acting on the antecedence tunnel lining. The field-measured values of the surrounding rock pressure behind the lining were used for comparison and verification. The study results have yielded important insights: 1) The impact of the second tunnel excavation on the first tunnel lining’s ability to withstand surrounding rock pressure is substantial, with the average increase in monitoring points reaching as high as 142%. 2) The pressure acting on the antecedence tunnel lining follows a distribution pattern of being lower at the waist of the arch and higher at the top and the shoulder, with the shoulder of the arch near the later excavated tunnel experiencing the greatest pressure. 3) The results of the surrounding rock loading obtained from the inverse analysis are more consistent with the field monitoring results, which argues for the soundness and practicality of the approach, and providing a reference basis for the structural design for the double-arch tunnel without middle drift.

Key words: load structure method, double-arch tunnel without middle drift, displacement inverse analysis, force on the lining

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 曹嘉祺, 王洪新, 王平, 孙德安, . 基于荷载结构法和强度折减法的人防工程安全性评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2105-2114.
[2] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[3] 孙明社,马 涛,申志军,吴 旭,王梦恕,. 复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[4] 王少杰,吕爱钟,张晓莉. 横观各向同性岩体中马蹄形隧洞的位移反分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[5] 田茂霖,肖洪天,闫强刚,. Hoek-Brown准则岩体力学参数非线性位移反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 343-350.
[6] 袁文华. 人工冻土黏弹塑性本构参数反分析研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3091-3095.
[7] 刘会波 ,肖 明 ,张志国 ,陈俊涛 . 考虑空间效应的地下洞室爆破开挖松动区参数场位移反分析[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2133-2141.
[8] 肖铭钊,周承豪,程 芸,冯晓腊,杨俊梅. 有限元与改进单纯形法联合编程技术在位移反分析中的应用[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 899-904.
[9] 刘泉声,付建军. 考虑桩土效应的双排桩模型及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 481-486.
[10] 苏国韶,张克实,吕海波. 位移反分析的粒子群优化-高斯过程协同优化方法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 510-515.
[11] 张勇慧,盛 谦,冷先伦,朱泽奇. 龙滩水电站左岸边坡二维位移反分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 396-401.
[12] 孙 钧,戚玉亮. 隧道围岩稳定性正算反演分析研究 ——以厦门海底隧道穿越风化深槽施工安全监控为例介绍[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2353-2360.
[13] 文建华,吴代华,陈军明,夏银飞. 地下洞室黏弹性位移反分析模式分层运算[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 967-970.
[14] 张春会,赵全胜. 基于ARCGIS的矿山开采沉陷灾害预警系统[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2197-2202.
[15] 刘开云,乔春生,刘保国. 基于遗传-广义回归神经元算法的坞石隧道三维弹塑性位移反分析研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1805-1809.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .