›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 689-694.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

沿海下卧软弱夹层碎石回填地基15 000 kN•m 高能级强夯试验

年廷凯1, 2,李鸿江3,杨 庆1, 2,陈允进4,王玉立5   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,大连 116023;2. 大连理工大学 岩土工程研究所,大连 116023;3. 中化岩土工程有限公司,北京 102600;4. 中交水运规划设计院,北京 100007;5. 辽宁水文地质工程地质勘察院,大连 116037
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-03 出版日期:2010-03-10 发布日期:2010-03-31
  • 作者简介:年廷凯,男,1971年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程教学及边(滑)坡工程、软基处理与桩基工程等方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室基金(No. LP0608);辽宁省博士启动基金(No. 20071084)资助项目。

Experiment of high energy dynamic compaction with 15 000 kN•m on a rubble fills site underlain by soft interlayer in coastal area

NIAN Ting-kai 1, 2,LI Hong-jiang3,YANG Qing 1, 2,CHEN Yun-jin4,WANG Yu-li5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China; 3. China Zhonghua Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd, Beijing 102600, China; 4. China Communications Planning & Design Institute for Water Transportation, Beijing 100007, China; 5. Investigation Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology of Liaoning Province, Dalian 116037, China
  • Received:2008-04-03 Online:2010-03-10 Published:2010-03-31

摘要:

针对某沿海下卧软弱夹层的碎石回填土地基,在国内首次开展了15 000 kN•m高能级强夯的现场试验。通过单点夯试验各夯点与夯坑周围地面沉降观测及强夯前后地基动力触探测试结果的对比分析,揭示了下卧软弱夹层的碎石回填地基上15 000 kN•m高能级强夯的作用机制,得出该条件下强夯的有效加固深度为11.5 m,主夯点间距宜为12.5 m,夯击数宜为18~22击的有关结论。其结果可为类似工程参考。

关键词: 高能级强夯;15 000 kN&bull, m;下卧软弱夹层;动力触探测试;有效加固深度

Abstract:

A field experiment of high energy dynamic compaction (HEDC) with 15 000 kN•m was carried out on a rubble fills site underlain by soft interlayer along coastal area for the first time in China. The ground settlements of drop points and their surrounding areas during a single drop DC are monitored, the dynamic penetration test (DPT) is carried out before and after HEDC. The test results are comprehensively analyzed, and the comparative studies are systematically done. Furthermore, the reinforcement mechanism of HEDC is discussed on a rubble fills site underlain by soft interlayer underlain, and some conclusions such as effective depth of improvement (EDI) on rubble fills site with 15 000 kN•m HEDC are drawn. It is recommended that the EDI should be 11.5 m, the intervals of 12.5 m between main drop points, and the drop numbers of 18-22 are suitable for a rubble fills foundation underlain by soft interlayer.

Key words: high energy dynamic compaction(HEDC), 15 000 kN•m, soft interlayer underlain, dynamic penetration test(DPT), effective depth of improvement (EDI)

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472.3+1
[1] 王宏祥,闫澍旺,冯守中. 强夯置换墩法处理公路软基的机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3753-3758.
[2] 徐东升,汪 稔,孟庆山,胡明鉴. 海相淤泥软土地基强夯置换砂桩试验分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3831-3836.
[3] 吕秀杰 ,龚晓南 ,李建国,. 强夯法施工参数的分析研究[J]. , 2006, 27(9): 1628-1632.
[4] 高广运 ,水伟厚 ,王亚凌 ,李 伟, . 高能级强夯在大型石化工程中的应用[J]. , 2004, 25(8): 1275-1278.
[5] 王保田 ,张福海 ,祝子泓,. 强夯法加固岷江防洪堤粉土地基的效果检验[J]. , 2004, 25(7): 1159-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 殷 杰,高玉峰,洪振舜. 连云港软黏土的不排水强度试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3297 -3301 .
[2] 陈绍杰,郭惟嘉,杨永杰. 煤岩蠕变模型与破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2595 -2598 .
[3] 林刚,徐长节,蔡袁强. 不平衡堆载作用下深基坑开挖支护结构性状研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2592 -2598 .
[4] 穆彦虎,马 巍,孙志忠,刘永智. 青藏铁路块石路基冷却降温效果对比分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 284 -292 .
[5] 赵炼恒,罗 强,李 亮,杨 峰,但汉成. 层状岩体边坡动态稳定性拟静力上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3627 -3634 .
[6] 康永君,杨 军,宋二祥. 地震作用下边坡安全系数时程计算及参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 261 -268 .
[7] 卢坤林,杨 扬. 考虑位移影响的主动土压力近似计算方法[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 553 -557 .
[8] 李荣建,于玉贞,吕 禾,李广信. 饱和砂土地基上抗滑桩加固边坡的动力离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 897 -902 .
[9] 肖成志,孙建诚,李雨润,刘晓朋. 三维土工网垫植草护坡防坡面径流冲刷的机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 453 -458 .
[10] 苏立君,廖红建,殷建华. 土钉抗拔试验过程中钉周土体应力变化研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 124 -128 .