悬索桥隧道式锚碇和下穿公路隧道相互作用机制研究

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 363-369.

悬索桥隧道式锚碇和下穿公路隧道相互作用机制研究

黎高辉^{1, 2}，吴从师²，邓泷波¹，韦晓阳¹，黎晨¹

1. 南宁轨道交通有限责任公司，南宁 530000；2. 长沙理工大学岩土与隧道工程系，长沙 410076

收稿日期:2010-04-24 出版日期:2010-08-10 发布日期:2010-09-09
作者简介:黎高辉，男，1982年生，硕士，主要从事地铁和爆破工程方面的设计与研究。
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金资助项目（No. 08JJ3102)；国家自然科学基金资助项目（No.50678028）。

Research on interaction mechanism of tunnel-type anchorage with undercrossing tunnel for suspension bridge

LI Gao-hui ^{1, 2}，WU Cong-shi²，DENG Long-bo¹，WEI Xiao-yang1，LI Chen¹

1. Nanning Rail Transit Co., Ltd., Nanning 530021, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical and Tunnel Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China

Received:2010-04-24 Online:2010-08-10 Published:2010-09-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

结合矮寨悬索桥的工程实践，采用MIDAS/GTS对茶洞岸锚碇和下穿公路隧道之间的相互作用机制进行研究。研究表明，开挖阶段锚-隧相互作用程度具有不对等性，即锚-隧影响大于隧-锚影响。在设计大缆拉力荷载作用下，下穿隧道的存在明显地改变了锚碇附近围岩的位移分布，导致锚碇附近围岩节点位移曲线发生整体下沉、旋转，并产生最大达0.76 mm的竖向附加位移。锚碇附近围岩竖向位移受下穿隧道影响较为显著，而水平向位移受影响相对较弱。对于锚碇隧道而言，下穿隧道单次爆破引起振动较小，距离爆心40 m范围以外围岩质点峰值振动速度小于2 cm/s，与实测资料吻合。工程项目现场的爆破振动监测及围岩波速测试成果显示：下穿隧道爆破掘进对40 m以外围岩的振动效应可以忽略。

关键词: 隧道式锚碇, 下穿隧道, 相互作用机制, 数值分析

Abstract:

Based on engineering practice in tunnel-type anchorage for Aizhai suspension bridge,the interaction mechanism of tunnel-type anchorage with undercrossing tunnel were obtained by numerical analysis in MIDAS/GTS.The results show that asymmetry interaction exists between tunnel-type anchorage and undercrossing tunnel in excavation stage; namely, the effects which tunnel-type anchorage acting on undercrossing tunnel is more significantly than its back face. In addition, the nodal displacements nearby the anchorages was changed obviously by the undercrossing tunnel; and in consequence,the vertical displacement curve of tunnel-type anchorage occurred sinking and rotating but there is some limited influence on the horizontal displacement; the vertical extra displacement can reach 0.76 mm because of the undercrossing tunnel. Finally, it is found that the blasting vibration which caused by development blasting of the undercrossing tunnel is weak in view of the tunnel-type anchorage, the vibration velocity less than 2 cm/s when the blast center distance exceeds 40 m; it is anastomosed with the measured data, the monitoring data show that the vibration effect is negligible to the tunnel-type anchorage when the blast center distance exceeds 40 m.

Key words: tunnel-type anchorage, undercrossing tunnel, interaction mechanism, numerical analysis

中图分类号:

TU 443

黎高辉，吴从师，邓泷波，韦晓阳，黎晨. 悬索桥隧道式锚碇和下穿公路隧道相互作用机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 363-369.

LI Gao-hui，WU Cong-shi，DENG Long-bo，WEI Xiao-yang，LI Chen. Research on interaction mechanism of tunnel-type anchorage with undercrossing tunnel for suspension bridge[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 363-369.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[2]	李宁, 杨敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[3]	郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[4]	王建军, 陈福全, 李大勇. 低填方加筋路基沉降的Kerr模型解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 250-259.
[5]	闫澍旺，李嘉，闫玥，陈浩，. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
[6]	阿比尔的，郑颖人，冯夏庭，丛宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[7]	郭浩然，乔兰，李远. 能源桩与周围土体之间荷载传递模型的改进及其桩身承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4042-4052.
[8]	李一凡，董世明，潘鑫，李念斌，原野. 砂岩的I/III复合型断裂试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4063-4070.
[9]	郭洋，李清，徐文龙，钱路，田策. 条形药包爆破预制贯通裂纹动态断裂过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3882-3890.
[10]	刘天翔，王忠福, . 隧道正交穿越深厚滑坡体的相互影响分析与应对措施[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 265-274.
[11]	宋许根，陈从新，夏开宗，陈龙龙，付华，邓洋洋，杜根明,. 竖井变形破坏机制与继续使用可行性探究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 331-342.
[12]	汪昕，蔡明, . 地震动在地下采场开挖边界的耦合数值分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3347-3354.
[13]	方志，陈育民，何森凯，何稼, . 减饱和松砂静态液化的水-气两相流耦合分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3378-3384.
[14]	李一凡，董世明，李念斌. 平台巴西圆盘复合型加载下T应力计算法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 645-650.
[15]	邱明明，杨啸，杨果林，房以河,. 云桂高速铁路新型全封闭路堑基床动响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 537-544.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed