竖向荷载下矩形闭合地下连续墙桥梁基础群墙效应研究

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 152-156.

竖向荷载下矩形闭合地下连续墙桥梁基础群墙效应研究

文华¹，程谦恭¹，陈晓东²，孟凡超²

1.西南交通大学土木工程学院，成都 610031；2.中交公路规划设计院，北京 100010

收稿日期:2007-05-23 出版日期:2009-01-10 发布日期:2011-01-14
作者简介:文华，男，1978年生，博士研究生，从事特殊土与基础工程方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No. 40172093）；国家杰出青年基金（No. 40025103）；交通部西部交通建设科技项目基金（No. 200331849457）；西南交通大学2008年博士研究生创新基金资助项目。

Research on wall group effect of rectangular closed diaphragm wall as bridge foundation under vertical loading

WEN Hua¹, CHENG Qian-gong¹, CHEN Xiao-dong², MENG Fan-chao²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 2. China Highway Planning and Design Institute, Beijing 100010, China

Received:2007-05-23 Online:2009-01-10 Published:2011-01-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

矩形闭合地下连续墙基础（简称闭合墙基础）是一种新型的桥梁基础。通过室内模型试验，对闭合墙基础的群墙效率、沉降比等进行了研究，同时探讨了闭合墙墙间距（即内侧边长）对群墙效应的影响。试验中采用了2组不同截面尺寸的模型墙，其中A组模型墙边长小于B组模型墙，墙厚和墙高均相同。试验研究表明，闭合墙与单片墙在相同沉降下的荷载比一般都大于1，B组闭合墙荷载比和群墙效率均大于A组闭合墙；闭合墙与单片墙在相同墙顶应力下的位移比和沉降比基本都大于1，A组闭合墙位移比大于B组闭合墙。在保持墙厚和墙高不变的情况下，适当增大闭合墙基础的内侧边长可以有效地提高群墙效率和承载性能，从而获得更好的经济效益。

关键词: 矩形闭合地下连续墙, 群墙效应, 群墙效率, 沉降比, 墙间距

Abstract:

Rectangular closed diaphragm wall foundation is a new type of bridge foundation. Wall group efficiency and settlement ratio and influence of wall spacing on wall group effect were studied through a model test. There were two groups of model walls in the test, all of the walls had same thickness and height, but side length of model walls in group A was less than that in group B. It was observed that the load ratio of closed diaphragm wall and single diaphragm wall with the same settlement was always large than 1; further more, the load ratio and wall group efficiency of closed diaphragm wall B was more lager than closed diaphragm wall A. The settlement ratio of closed diaphragm wall and single diaphragm wall with the same head pressure was also large than 1; and the settlement of closed diaphragm wall A was more lager than closed diaphragm wall B. Enlarging the wall spacing was a effective measure to improve the wall group efficiency and load-bearing capacity with the same wall thickness and wall height. Then better economic benefits would be obtained.

Key words: rectangular closed diaphragm wall, wall group effect, wall group efficiency, settlement ratio, wall spacing

中图分类号:

TU 476+.2

文华，程谦恭，陈晓东，孟凡超. 竖向荷载下矩形闭合地下连续墙桥梁基础群墙效应研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 152-156.

WEN Hua, CHENG Qian-gong, CHEN Xiao-dong, MENG Fan-chao. Research on wall group effect of rectangular closed diaphragm wall as bridge foundation under vertical loading[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 152-156.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	田湖南，孔令伟. 细粒对砂土持水能力影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 56 -60 .
[2]	杨涛，周德培，马惠民，张忠平. 滑坡稳定性分析的点安全系数法[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 971 -975 .
[3]	文松霖，胡胜刚，胡汉兵，邓凡，任佳丽. 渠坡上基桩的水平承载机制试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1786 -1790 .
[4]	李文培，王明洋，范鹏贤. 基于间断位移场的隧道围岩承载能力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2441 -2447 .
[5]	张菊连，沈明荣. 基于逐步判别分析的砂土液化预测研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 298 -302 .
[6]	羊晔，刘松玉，邓永锋. 加筋路基处治不均匀沉降模型试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 703 -706 .
[7]	蒋青青，胡毅夫，赖伟明. 层状岩质边坡遍布节理模型的三维稳定性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 712 -716 .
[8]	郑刚，颜志雄，雷华阳，王晟堂. 天津市区第一海相层粉质黏土卸荷路径下强度特性的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1201 -1208 .
[9]	戴洪军，刘欣良，任治军，韦华. 圆形煤场中桩-网复合地基原体试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 487 -494 .
[10]	谢永健，王怀忠，朱合华. 软黏土中PHC管桩打入过程中土塞效应研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1671 -1675 .