岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2354-2368.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1409

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于差异沉降和轴向刚度控制的竖向荷载作用下群桩基础优化分析

张治国1, 2，张 瑞1，黄茂松3，宫剑飞4   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院，上海 200093；2. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室，江苏 徐州 221116； 3. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092；4. 中国建筑科学研究院 地基基础研究所，北京 100013
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-11 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-22
  • 作者简介:张治国，1978年生，男，博士（后），副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事地下工程施工影响方面的研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.51738010，No.41772331）；中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室基金项目（No.SKLGDUEK1707）。

Optimization analysis of pile group foundation based on differential settlement control and axial stiffness under vertical loads

ZHANG Zhi-guo1, 2, ZHANG Rui1, HUANG Mao-song3, GONG Jian-fei4   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Institute of Foundation Engineering, China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2018-09-11 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51738010, 41772331) and the Projects of State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(SKLGDUEK1707).

PDF (Chinese)

184

摘要： 目前在群桩设计中仍大多数采用均匀等长布桩的方法，这种方法在基础受力、变形等方面存在较大的缺陷。考虑增大群桩轴向刚度和减小群桩基础差异沉降的条件下，将群桩基础位移函数与桩长优化函数相结合，在对基础采取行变换、平面变换的方式下，通过设置不同的桩长比值ξ、连接曲率值η设定不同布桩方案，分析不同方案下群桩基础轴向刚度比、差异沉降比的变化规律；并利用数值模拟法对所得优化结果的可靠性进行验证。此外，针对不同桩土刚度比、不同桩间距对群桩基础的轴向刚度比和差异沉降比进行了参数分析。研究结果表明：不同群桩基础优化变换方式、不同桩长对群桩基础优化结果会产生不同的影响；当优化目的是为增加群桩基础刚度时，应主要考虑行变换的优化方式，当优化目的是为减小基础差异沉降时，应主要考虑平面变换的优化方式；基础轴向刚度比随着桩土刚度比的增加而增大，随着桩间距的减小而增大；基础差异沉降比随着桩土刚度比的增加而减小，随着桩间距的减小而减小。

关键词: 群桩, 桩长优化, 轴向刚度比, 差异沉降比

Abstract: At present, the method of uniform isometric piles is used in most group pile designs. This method has major defects in foundation stress and deformation. Considering the increase of group pile foundation stiffness and reducing the differential settlement of group pile foundation, the group pile foundation displacement function is combined with the pile length optimization function. Under the method of line transformation and squared transformation, different group pile designs are determined by setting different pile length ratio ξ and connection curvature η. The scheme is used to analyze the variation law of axial stiffness ratio and differential settlement ratio of group pile foundation under different schemes. The reliability of theoretical analysis results is verified by finite element method. In addition, parametric analysis of axial stiffness ratio and differential settlement ratio of pile group foundations are based on different pile-soil stiffness ratios and different pile spacings. The results show that the optimal transformation mode of different pile groups and different pile lengths have different effects on the optimization results of group pile foundations. When the optimization purpose is to increase the pile group foundation stiffness, the optimization method of line transformation should be chosen. When the optimization purpose is to decrease the differential settlement of pile group foundation, the optimization method of squared transformation should be chosen. The axial stiffness of pile group increases with the increasing of pile-soil stiffness ratio and the decreasing of pile spacing. The differential settlement ratio of pile group decreases with the increasing of pile-soil stiffness ratio and the decreasing of pile spacing.

Key words: pile group, optimization of pile length, axial stiffness ratio, differential settlement ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 范怡飞, 王建华, . 考虑桩靴贯入对邻近群桩效应影响的分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2360-2368.
[2] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[3] 方金城, 孔纲强, 陈斌, 车平, 彭怀风, 吕志祥, . 混凝土水化作用对群桩热力学特性影响现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2997-3003.
[4] 高广运, 谢伟, 陈娟, 赵宏, . 高铁运行引起的高架桥群桩基础地面振动衰减分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3197-3206.
[5] 蔡奇鹏, 甘港璐, 吴宏伟, 陈星欣, 肖朝昀, . 正断层诱发砂土中群桩基础破坏及避让距离研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1067-1075.
[6] 孔令刚, 肖方初, 樊继营, 陈云敏, . 水平偏心受荷群桩p乘子计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4659-4667.
[7] 杨耀辉，陈育民，刘汉龙，李文闻，江 强, . 排水刚性桩群桩抗液化性能的振动台试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4025-4032.
[8] 马学宁，付 江，王 军，王 旭，. 不同堆载形式对群桩负摩阻力的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3531-3538.
[9] 辛冬冬，张乐文，宿传玺. 基于虚土桩模型的层状地基群桩沉降研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2368-2376.
[10] 王家全，刘垒雷，朱庆盛，张 昊,. 红黏土地层静压闭口管桩残余应力模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1878-1886.
[11] 刘林超，闫启方，闫 盼. 考虑三维波动的饱和土中管桩群桩的水平振动研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2817-2825.
[12] 冯 君，张俊云，朱 明，江 南,. 软土地层高承台桥梁群桩基础横向承载特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 94-104.
[13] 孔纲强，顾红伟，周立朵，彭怀风, . 低承台扩底楔形桩群桩效应系数研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 461-468.
[14] 马少坤，邵 羽，吕 虎，WONG K S ，吴宏伟，陈 欣，江 杰，. 地下水位循环变化时隧道开挖对群桩的长期影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1563-1568.
[15] 高志尧 ，赵 鹏，齐明柱，李锦辉，苏 栋，. 砂土中群桩的压拔加载试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 419-423.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发