›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 617-622.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

环形超深基坑围护结构受力变形特性分析

罗耀武1, 2,凌道盛1,陈云敏1,胡 琦3,陈 峥4   

  1. 1.浙江大学,软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,杭州 310027;2.黄河勘测规划设计有限公司,郑州 450003; 3.浙江工业大学,杭州 310014;4.华东电力设计院,上海 200063
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-03 出版日期:2011-02-10 发布日期:2011-02-16
  • 通讯作者: 胡琦,男,1978年生,博士,主要从事桩基工程与深基坑工程的研究。 E-mail:huqi@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:罗耀武,男,1982年生,博士,主要从事桩基工程与深基坑工程的研究。

Mechanical and deformation characteristics of enclosure structure for annular extra-deep excavation

LUO Yao-wu 1, 2, LING Dao-sheng1, CHEN Yun-min1, HU Qi3, CHEN Zheng4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of Education Ministry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China; 3. Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China; 4. East China Electric Power Design Institute, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Received:2009-07-03 Online:2011-02-10 Published:2011-02-16

摘要:

结合上海世博500 kV变电站超深基坑实际工程,采用平面应变及轴对称弹性地基有限元分析模型对基坑围护结构的空间效应进行简化,分析了环形基坑空间效应、内衬墙以及水土压力模式对围护结构受力变形特性的影响,并与实测结果进行比较。结果表明,环形基坑围护结构的空间效应对其受力变形特性影响很大,在计算过程中必须考虑围护结构环向刚度对径向刚度的贡献;内衬墙作用类似于环形支撑,对地下连续墙受力及变形是有利的;地下连续墙水平位移实测值最接近于侧压力系数1.0的轴对称有限元分析结果;地下连续墙环向应力和弯矩实测值位于按规范水土分算与侧压力系数1.0的轴对称有限元计算结果之间。

关键词: 环形超深基坑, 围护结构

Abstract:

Based on the deep excavation of Shanghai 2010 Exposition 500 kV substation, the plane strain and axisymmetric elastic foundation FEM are used to simplify the space effect of the enclosure structure. The space effect of the annular enclosure structure, the inner liner and the different water and soil pressure distribution model are considered for the mechanical and deformation characteristics of enclosure structure. Through comparision between the calculated and measured results, several results are obtained: the space effect of the annular enclosure structure has a great influence on the mechanical and deformation characteristics of it; the ring stiffness of the enclosure structure must be considered during calculation; the inner liner is beneficial to the mechanical and deformation of the diaphragm wall, like a ring supporting; the measured horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall is close to the result of axisymmetric finite element analysis when lateral pressure coefficient is 1.0; the measured hoop stress and bending moment of diaphragm wall are between the result of estimating water and earth pressure separately and lateral pressure coefficient is 1.0.

Key words: annular extra-deep excavation, enclosure structure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 753
[1] 刘成禹,陈淑云,. 基坑围护结构增量计算法的改进[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1834-1839.
[2] 张 戈,毛海和. 软土地区深基坑围护结构综合刚度研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1467-1474.
[3] 李卫超,熊巨华,杨 敏. 分层土中水泥土围护结构抗倾覆验算方法的改进[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2435-2440.
[4] 刘 杰,姚海林,任建喜. 地铁车站基坑围护结构变形监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 456-461.
[5] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372-3378.
[6] 任建喜,刘 杰. 森林公园地铁车站深基坑变形规律有限元分析[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 639-642.
[7] 卢晓峰 ,丁勇春 . 特殊类型基坑变形性状二维有限元分析[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 682-686.
[8] 陈生东 ,简文彬 , . 复杂环境下基坑开挖监测与分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 1188-1191.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[10] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,彭建兵,李 红. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 196 -199 .