›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3439-3446.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.014

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Structure deformation of coal induced by gas migration ——A case of injecting helium gas into intact coal

WANG Chun-guang1, 2, 3, WANG Chang-sheng1, TAO Zhi-gang2, JIANG Yu-jing1,TAN Yun-liang1, WEI Ming-yao3, CUI Guang-lei3, WU Xue-zhen1, 4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanic and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, 100083, China; 3. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
  • Received:2015-01-15 Online:2015-12-11 Published:2018-06-14
  • Supported by:

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41202194, 51474204 and 51134005), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province(Grant No. ZR2012EEQ021), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013M542097), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory in CUMTB(Grant No. SKLGDUEK1421), ‘Taishan Scholar’ at SDUST, “Young Core Instructor and Domestic Visitor” Foundation From college of Shandong Province and Open Project of State Key Laboratory in IRSM (Grant No. Z014006).

Abstract: Coal deformation induced by gas migration is significant to investigate coal bed methane recovery and geological sequestration of greenhouse gas. Generally, the variations of effective stress result in the shrinkage of geo-materials. However, the relationship between coal permeability and effective stress or pore pressure is nonlinear from extensive experimental results. Therefore, experiments are performed to study coal deformation caused by the flow of injected pure helium gas under hydrostatic pressure and triaxial stress conditions, respectively. Experimental results show that the coal sample undergoes a transition from shrinkage to recovery under hydrostatic pressure. Although both the coal shrinkage and recovery are proportional to the pressure of injected gas, the magnitude of shrinkage is greater than that of recovery. Under triaxial stress conditions, the coal sample rapidly expands at the beginning of helium injection. As the gas injection approaches equilibrium, the coal deformation is significantly controlled by the boundary condition. The coal expansion rate changes slowly under stress controlled condition, while the coal transits from expansion to shrinkage under displacement controlled condition. The above results indicate that the gas pressure difference between coal matrices and cleats is able to compress the matrix volume, and such compressed coal also could recover due to gas diffusion. In addition, the coal deformation is controlled by the interaction between cleats and matrix. It can be explained that coal matrices and cleats expand freely under the stress controlled boundary, while the coal matrix expansion induced by gas diffusion only narrow the aperture of cleats under displacement controlled condition. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the deformation evolution of coal induced by gas injection based on experimental results, which is particularly significant for deeply understanding the coal permeability.

Key words: gas injection, cleat and matrix, boundary condition

CLC Number: 

  • TU 454
[1] ZHAO Mi, OUYANG Wen-long, HUANG Jing-qi, DU Xiu-li, ZHAO Xu, . Analysis of axis dynamic response of rock tunnels through fault fracture zone under P waves of earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[2] JIANG Zhong-ming, LIU Li-yuan, ZHAO Hai-bin, TANG Dong, HU Wei, MEI Song-hua, LI Peng, . Study of dynamic boundary conditions for thermo-mechanical coupling analysis of underground gas storage cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1149-1157.
[3] HUANG Biao, LI Ming-guang, HOU Yong-mao, CHEN Jin-jian, . Effect of auto-compensating steel struts on stress and deformation behaviors of supporting structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 359-365.
[4] LIU Shi-wei, SHENG Qian, ZHU Ze-qi, GONG Yan-feng, CUI Zhen, LI Jian-he, ZHANG Shan-kai,. Research on boundary effect of groundwater seepage in tunnel surrounding rock [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4001-4009.
[5] DENG Gao-yang, XIAO Ming, CHEN Jun-tao. Simulation of seepage boundary of underground cavern based on variational inequality [J]. , 2017, 38(3): 762-768.
[6] LI Zan, LEI Guo-hui, FU Cui-wei,. Free-strain solutions for two-dimensional consolidation with a sand-wall drain [J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1613-1622.
[7] LI Lang, WANG Ming-yang, FAN Peng-xian, CHENG Yi-hao, LI Zhi-zhong, JIANG Hai-ming. Development of loading and unloading apparatus for model test in deep underground engineering [J]. , 2016, 37(1): 297-304.
[8] CHU Ya, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, . Research and development of calibration chamber model test with in-situ injection device [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 452-458.
[9] ZHANG Wen-jie, ZHAO Pei, JIA Wen-qiang. Boundary conditions of one-dimensional convection-diffusion column tests and unified analytical solution [J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2759-2764.
[10] SHANGGUAN Shi-qing , YANG Min , LI Wei-chao , . Distance between location of displacement applied boundary and passive pile [J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2934-2938.
[11] DUAN Kang , ZHANG Qiang-yong , XIANG Wen , CAI Bing , . Physical model test on operational safety of injection and recovery casing of underground salt rock gas storages [J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1605-1612.
[12] ZHAO Yue-tang,LUO Zhong-xing,LI Zhen-hui,CHU Cheng. Boundary condition setting method for coupled static and dynamic response analysis of deep underground structure [J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1495-1500.
[13] ZHANG Le-wen , ZHANG De-yong , QIU Dao-hong. Application of radial basis function neural network to geostress field back analysis [J]. , 2012, 33(3): 799-804.
[14] LIU Dong-yan, ZHENG Zhi-ming, HOU Long. Research on boundary condition effect and material porosity sensitivity for slope model [J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 23-27.
[15] FENG Da-kuo, HOU Wen-jun, ZHANG Jian-min, ZHANG Ga. Experimental study of 3D cyclic behavior of interface under different normal boundary conditions [J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2419-2424.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Ying-yong,ZHANG Ding-li,ZHANG Hong-bo,SONG Xiu-guang. Research on failure mechanism and effects of prestressed anchor cables for reinforcing slopes[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] LI Jing,MIAO Lin-chang,ZHONG Jian-chi,FENG Zhao-xiang. Deformation and damping characteristics of EPS beads-mixed lightweight soil under repeated load-unloading[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[3] LIANG Jian-wei, FANG Ying-guang, GU Ren-guo. Analysis of microelectric field effect of seepage in tiny-particle clay[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] WANG Li-yan,JIANG Peng-ming,LIU Han-long. Mechanism analysis of residual liquefied deformation of breakwater during earthquake[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] LI Xiu-zhen,WANG Cheng-hua,DENG Hong-yan. A comparison of distance and Fisher discrimination methods applied to identifying potential landslides[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] JI Wu-jun. Investigation and analysis of engineering problems for loess tunnels[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] CHEN Li-hua , LIN Zhi , LI Xing-ping. Study of efficacy of systematic anchor bolts in highway tunnels[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] CHEN Li-wen, SUN De-an. Bifurcation analysis of overconsolidated clays with soil-water coupling along different stress paths[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] ZHENG Gang ZHANG Li-ming DIAO Yu. Analysis of working performance of piles beneath excavation bottom and settlement calculation[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] ZHAO Ming-hua, LEI Yong, ZHANG Rui. Study of punching failure mode and safe thickness of pile foundation in karst region[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .