›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3231-3239.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.024

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Erosion analysis of argillaceous sandstone under dry-wet cycle in two pH conditions

WANG Zi-juan1, 2, LIU Xin-rong1, 2, FU Yan3, ZHANG Liang4, YUAN Wen1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2.Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3.College of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. Construction Quality and Safety Supervision Station of Banan District, Chongqing 401320, China
  • Received:2015-12-24 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372356) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308567).

Abstract: Argillaceous sandstone from a slope in Three Gorges Reservoir is investigated. A series of tests including triaxial compression test under four confining pressures, scanning electron microscope (SEM) is conducted on the sandstone samples subjected to cyclic wetting-drying in different pH conditions(pH=3, pH=7). The area ratio of skeleton and fractal dimension of images obtained by SEM under different pH conditions and different times of dry-wet cycle is obtained by MATLAB. The study shows that when samples suffer the same times of dry-wet cycle, the fractal dimension in acidic conditions (pH=3) is bigger than that in neutral conditions (pH=7). Also, it is indicated that the fractal dimension is proportion to water absorption rate and inversely proportion to skeleton area and cohesion. And the critical area ratio of skeleton of argillaceous sandstone subjected to alternation of wetting and drying is calculated to be 0.55. A concept of erosion degree is defined for argillaceous sandstone subjected to dry-wet cycles. Then a relation curve between the erosion degree of argillaceous sandstone and times of dry-wet cycle is obtained by fitting. Damage variable formula of cohesive force is derived. The study results provide theoretical basis for erosion of argillaceous sandstone in different pH conditions.

Key words: dry-wet cycle, scanning electron microscope, fractal dimension, erosion degree, Mohr-Coulomb criterion

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452

[1] ZOU Xian-jian, WANG Yi-teng , WANG Chuan-ying, . Three-dimensional morphological feature of rock structural surfaces and dominant anti-slip direction using the borehole images [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[2] HONG Chen-jie, HUANG Man, XIA Cai-chu, LUO Zhan-you, DU Shi-gui, . Study of size effect on the anisotropic variation coefficient of rock joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[3] CHU Fu-yong, ZHU Jun-gao, WENG Hou-yang, YE Yang-fan. Experimental study on maximum dry density of scaled coarse-grained soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[4] LIU Gong-xun, LI Wei, HONG Guo-jun, ZHANG Kun-yong, CHEN Xiu-han, SHI Shao-gang, RUTTEN Tom. Sandstone failure characteristics in large-scale cutting model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[5] CHENG Hao, TANG Hui-ming, WU Qiong, LEI Guo-ping, . An elasto-plasticity extended Cam-clay model for unsaturated soils using explicit integration algorithm in FEM with hydraulic hysteresis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[6] SUN Hong, SONG Chun-yu, TENG Mu-wei, GE Xiu-run. Pore evolution characteristics of soft clay under loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[7] LEI Hua-yang, HU Yao, LEI Shuang-hua, QI Zi-yang, XU Ying-gang, . Analysis of microstructure characteristics of air-booster vacuum preloading for ultra-soft dredger fills [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[8] ZHAO Guo-yan, LI Zhen-yang, WU Hao, WANG En-jie, LIU Lei-lei. Dynamic failure characteristics of sandstone with non-penetrating cracks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[9] LUO Bin-yu, YE Yi-cheng, CAO Zhong, WANG Qi-hu, LI Yu-fei, CHEN Hu, . Estimation of pillar strength and effect of inclination under gently inclined layered deposits based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1940-1946.
[10] REN Ke-bin, WANG Bo, LI Xin-ming, YIN Song, . Strength properties and pore-size distribution of earthen archaeological site under dry-wet cycles of capillary water [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[11] ZHANG Xiao-yan, CAI Yan-yan, ZHOU Hao-ran, YANG Yang, LI Yu-long, . Shear behaviors and fractal dimensions of carol sand at large shear strains [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 610-615.
[12] FEI Suo-zhu, TAN Xiao-hui, SUN Zhi-hao, DU Lin-feng. Analysis of autocorrelation distance of soil based on microstructure simulation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4751-4758.
[13] XIAO Xiao-chun, FAN Yu-feng, WU Di, DING Xin, WANG Lei, ZHAO Bao-you, . Energy dissipation feature and rock burst risk assessment in coal-rock combinations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4203-4212.
[14] ZHANG Ling, CHEN Jin-hai, ZHAO Ming-hua. Maximum cantilever anti-slide piles spacing determination with consideration of soil arching effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[15] ZENG Yin, LIU Jian-feng, ZHOU Zhi-wei, WU Chi, LI Zhi-cheng, . Creep acoustic emission and damage evolution of salt rock under uniaxial compression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 207-215.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!