›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1682-1690.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1280

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation of wall displacement to reach active or passive earth pressure state

XIE Tao1, 2, LUO Qiang1, 2, ZHANG Liang1, 2, LIAN Ji-feng1, 2, YU Yue-ming1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2016-06-02 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2013CB036204) and the Research and Development Program of China Railway (2014G003-A).

Abstract: The movement of wall plays an important role in the calculation of lateral earth pressure and the design of retaining structure. Regarding the process of backfill approach active or passive pressure state as the shearing process of soil sample in simple shear test or direct shear test, the backfill process reaches active or passive earth pressure state when the soil deformation equals to the ultimate value (shear strain in the simple test or shear displacement per unit length in the direct shear test). Based on the geometric relationship between the soil shear deformation and wall displacement, the theoretical calculation method of wall displacement required to reach active or passive earth pressure is provided, where the soil stress-strain behavior and initial stress state are considered. The analysis indicates that the magnitude of needed wall displacement to reach active or passive earth pressure is controlled by soil ultimate shear deformation, the range of active or passive zone, and the initial earth pressure state. The first factor is the most important among them, which contributes to variation of wall displacement among different soils. The wall displacement in passive state is greater than that in active state, because the range of passive zone is larger than that of active zone. The theoretically calculated wall displacement attaining active state is about 0.5‰~13.2‰ H (where H is the height of the wall), of which the non-cohesive soil is larger than the cohesive soil. As to the case of passive state, the wall displacement is ?0.4%~?5.2% H. The theories are concordant with the model test results from relevant literatures.

Key words: active or passive earth pressure state, displacement of wall, Rankine and Coulomb earth pressure theories, soil ultimate shear deformation, simple shear test, direct shear test

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470

[1] WANG Pei-tao, HUANG Zheng-jun, REN Fen-hua, ZHANG Liang, CAI Mei-feng, . Research on direct shear behaviour and fracture patterns of 3D-printed complex jointed rock models [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[2] HE Peng-fei, MA Wei, MU Yan-hu, HUANG Yong-ting, DONG Jian-hua, . Experimental analysis of interfacial shear behavior of loess-mortar block and construction of constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[3] CHAI Wei, LONG Zhi-lin, KUANG Du-min, CHEN Jia-min, YAN Chao-ping. Effect of shear rate on shear strength and deformation characteristics of calcareous sand in direct shear test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[4] LI Wen-Xuan, BIAN Shi-hai , LI Guo-ying, WU Jun-jie, . Interface model of coarse-grained soils and its application in earth rock dam [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[5] CHEN Guo-qing, TANG Peng, LI Guang-ming, ZHANG Guang-ze, WANG Dong, . Analysis of acoustic emission frequency spectrum characteristics and main fracture precursor of rock bridge in direct shear test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[6] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, CHEN Jun, LU Jing-jing, CUI Guo-jian, YANG Pin-qing, . Experimental study of shear deformation characteristics of marble dentate joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[7] CUI Guo-jian, ZHANG Chuan-qing, LIU Li-peng, ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan,. Study of effect of shear velocity on mechanical characteristics of bolt-grout interface [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[8] JI Wen-dong, ZHANG Yu-ting, WANG Yang, PEI Wen-bin, . Comparative study of shear performance between coral sand and siliceous sand in cycles simple shear test [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 282-288.
[9] WEI Kuang-min , CHEN Sheng-shui, LI Guo-ying, WU Jun-jie, . Influence of contact effect between dam body and dam foundation on behaviours of high concrete faced rockfill dam built in steep valleys [J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[10] CHEN Chen, LENG Wu-ming, YANG Qi, JIN Zi-hao, NIE Ru-song, QIU Jun,. Experimental study of mechanical properties of concrete pile-slurry-sand interface [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[11] ZHAO Kun, CHEN Wei-zhong, ZHAO Wu-sheng, YANG Dian-sen,SONG Wan-peng, LI Can, MA Shao-sen, . Direct shear test and numerical simulation for mechanical characteristics of the contact surface between the lining and shock absorption layer in underground engineering [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2662-2670.
[12] LIU Fei-yu, SHI Jing, WANG Jun, CAI Yuan-qiang,. Dynamic shear behavior of interface for clay reinforced with geogrid encapsulated in thin layers of sand [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1991-1998.
[13] WU Meng-tao, LIU Fang-cheng, CHEN Ju-long, CHEN Lu. Influence of water content on dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of rubber-sand mixture under large strains [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 803-814.
[14] WANG Yong-hong, ZHANG Ming-yi, LIU Jun-wei, BAI Xiao-yu, . Influence of excess pore water pressure on shear strength of pile-soil interface in clayey soil [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[15] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, . A new method to originally reproduce rock structural plane by integrating 3D scanning and 3D carving techniques and mechanical characteristics of reproduced structural planes [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 417-425.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!