›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2099-2105.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1775

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analytical model of fluid pressure evolution in the reservoir for CO2 geological storage

WU Hai-qing1, 2, BAI Bing1, LI Xiao-chun1, LIU Ming-ze1, 2, HE Yuan-yuan1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2016-09-11 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology Key Research and Development Program of International Cooperation (S2016G9005).

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the mechanism of multi-phase flow migration and the evolution rule of fluid pressure in the reservoir more scientifically and precisely, and to improve the accuracy of analytical calculation and analysis. The flow field was divided into three regions firstly and then inverted the saturation of each phase fluid in the mixed fluid flow region of two-phase fluid based on the conservation equation of seepage volume in the flow field. Subsequently, a generalised Darcy’s formula suited for the two-phase flow was obtained by directly introducing the total mobility into Darcy’s formula. Thus, a more accurate analytical model was derived for characterising the fluid pressure evolution in the reservoir. At last, this analytical model was applied to calculate a CO2 injection example, and the obtained results were compared with the explicit integral solution in existing references and the simulated results of TOUGH2/ECO2N. The compared results indicated that the reliability of the analytical model was verified and the superiority was reflected in the aspect of calculation accuracy. In addition, the calculation results showed that the full process of the actual fluid pressure evolution in the reservoir could be described well by the analytical model of this work, though it was obtained under the assumption of steady flow. The main reason is contributed to that the determination method of saturation in this model is more scientific and accurate. Hence, this model can be applied in practical engineering.

Key words: analytical model, two-phase flow, saturation, generalised Darcy’s law, CO2 geological storage

CLC Number: 

  • TV 139

[1] TAO Shuai, DONG Yi, WEI Chang-fu, . Small-strain stiffness test system of soil under controllable environmental humidity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[2] SHENG Jian-long, HAN Yun-fei, YE Zu-yang, CHENG Ai-ping, HUANG Shi-bing, . Relative permeability model for water-air two-phase flow in rough-walled fractures and numerical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[3] LIU Quan-sheng, HE Fan, DENG Peng-hai, TIAN Yong-chao . Application of 3D printing technology in physical modelling in rock mechanics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3397-3404.
[4] ZHANG Qiang, LI Xiao-chun, ZHOU Ying-bo, SHI Lu, BAI Bing, . Shear behavior of the Triassic sandstone in Sichuan under high pore pressure of H2O/CO2 conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[5] ZOU Yuan-jing, WEI Chang-fu, CHENG He-long, ZHOU Jia-zuo, WAN Yi-zhao, . Elastic-plastic model for gas-hydrate-bearing soils using disturbed state concept [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2653-2662.
[6] KONG Xian-jing, NING Fan-wei, LIU Jing-mao, ZOU De-gao, ZHOU Chen-guang, . Influences of stress paths and saturation on particle breakage of rockfill materials [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[7] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[8] CHEN Wen-wu, LIU Wei, WANG Juan, SUN Guan-ping, WU Wei-jiang, . Relationship between saturation degree and B value for loess [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 834-842.
[9] LI Jing, CHEN Yu-min, FANG Zhi, GAO Han, TOBITA Tetsuo, ZHOU Ge, . Liquefaction characteristics analysis on gently tilting desaturated sandy ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4352-4360.
[10] ZHANG Zhi-hong, CHEN Yang, ZHANG Zhi-liang, TIAN Gai-lei. Hydro-mechanical-chemical coupling model and numerical simulation under high saturated condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 100-106.
[11] CHEN He-long, WEI Chang-fu, TIAN Hui-hui, WEI Hou-zhen,. Triaxial compression tests on gas saturated CO2-hydrate-bearing sand [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2395-2402.
[12] LI Kai-da, HU Shao-bin, LI Xiao-chun, WU Jian, FAN Qing-yi, WU Hai-qing,. Influence of single-phase fluid on strength characteristics of sandstone [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1789-1795.
[13] FANG Zhi, CHEN Yu-min, HE Sen-kai, . A modified method for mechanical-hydraulic coupled simulation based on a single-phase fluid for desaturated sand soil [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1851-1857.
[14] JIANG Ming-jing, LIU Jun, ZHOU Wei, XI Bang-lu, . An elasto-plastic constitutive model for methane hydrate bearing sediments [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1153-1158.
[15] CHAO Zhi-ming, WANG Huan-ling, XU Wei-ya, JIA Chao-jun, ZHAO Kai,. A rapid method for preparing rock samples with different water saturation levels [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1109-1114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!