›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 565-573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.033

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A nonlinear method for determining two-dimensional joint roughness coefficient based on statistical parameters

WANG Chang-shuo, WANG Liang-qing, GE Yun-feng, LIANG Ye, SUN Zi-hao, DONG Man-man, ZHANG Nan   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-02-23 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372310), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2015M570671) and the Fundamental Research Funds for National University, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan)(1610491T07).

Abstract: There is a complex nonlinear relationship between rock joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and the statistical parameters. And JRC value calculated using single statistical parameter is not reliable, since the description is one-sided on the morphology of discontinuity surface. Four parameters, average inclination angle , average relative amplitude , standard deviation of inclination angle and standard deviation of amplitude , are selected to describe the morphology of discontinuity surface. The training samples containing 102 profiles with available experimental back-calculated JRC values are chosen to establish the nonlinear relationship between JRC and the selected statistical parameters, then a JRC support vector regression (SVR) prediction model is established. The SVR model is proved to be reliable by comparing the predicted and experimental back-calculated JRC of Barton standard profiles. The discontinuities of Majiagou landslide in Zigui county, Three Gorges Reservoir Region are selected as a case. Three-dimensional laser scanning test is conducted to obtain the morphology data of discontinuity surface and a 3D model of discontinuity surface morphology is developed. Direct shear test is carried out to back calculate its JRC. The results show that JRC predicted by the SVR model and experimental back-calculated value have good consistency, and the relative error is only 4.5%. The JRC estimation results by different regression equations based on statistical parameters for the same profile have larger variation, which indicates that the JRC predicted by SVR model based on the chosen statistical parameters is more reliable. The results may also provide a new approach to quantitatively determine JRC.

Key words: discontinuities, statistical parameter, joint roughness coefficient, support vector machine, three-dimensional laser scanning

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457

[1] HOU Qin-kuan, YONG Rui, DU Shi-gui, XU Min-na, CAO Ze-min. Methods of determining the minimum number of samples for statistical measurement of rock joint roughness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[2] RUAN Yong-fen, GAO Chun-qin, LIU Ke-wen, JIA Rong-gu, DING Hai-tao, . Inversion of rock and soil mechanics parameters based on particle swarm optimization wavelet support vector machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3662-3669.
[3] WANG Peng-fei, TAN Wen-hui, MA Xue-wen, LI Zi-jian, LIU Jing-jun, WU Yang-fan. Experimental study of seepage characteristics of consecutive and filling fracture with different roughness levels and gap-widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[4] WU Guan-ye, ZHENG Hui-feng, XU Jian-rong. Model test study of stability and failure mechanism of three-dimensional complicated block system slope with deeply reinforcement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[5] WU Qiong, WANG Xiao-han, TANG Hui-ming, LIU Chao-yuan, JIANG Yao-fei, XU Yan-jun, . Shear property and water-induced deterioration of discontinuities between different types of rocks in Badong formation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1881-1889.
[6] WANG Qi , SUN Hui-bin , JIANG Bei , GAO Song , LI Shu-cai , GAO Hong-ke, . A method for predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rock mass based on digital drilling test technology and support vector machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[7] GE Yun-feng, ZHONG Peng, TANG Hui-ming, ZHAO Bin-bin, WANG Liang-qing, XIA Ding, QIU Ya-shi, LI Peng-fei, ZHANG Li, WEN Lian, CAO Tian-ci, . Intelligent measurement on geometric information of rock discontinuities based on borehole image [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4467-4476.
[8] YANG Sheng-qi, LU Jia-wei, TIAN Wen-ling, TANG Jin-zhou,. Experimental study of mechanical behavior of rock specimens with different joint roughness coefficient under conventional triaxial compression [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 21-32.
[9] CHEN Long-long, CHEN Cong-xin, XIA Bo-ru, XIA Kai-zong, FU Hua, DENG Yang-yang, SONG Xu-geng, SUN Zhao-yi. Study on mechanism of formation and expansion of ground caving-in in the eastern Chengchao Iron Mine [J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2322-2334.
[10] SONG Lei-bo, JIANG Quan, LI Yuan-hui, YANG Chen-xiang, ZHONG Shan, ZHANG Mei-zhu,. Stability of statistical parameters of discontinuities morphology and anisotropy based on different sampling intervals [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1121-1132.
[11] SONG Lei-bo1, JIANG Quan, LI Yuan-hui, YANG Cheng-xiang, RAN Shu-guang, WANG Bai-lin, LIU Ting,. Description of discontinuities morphology based on shear behavior [J]. , 2017, 38(2): 525-533.
[12] GE Yun-feng, CHEN Yong, WANG Liang-qing, HUO Shao-lei, . Estimation of 3D joint matching coefficient of rock discontinuities using point cloud data alignment technology [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3385-3393.
[13] HAN Zeng-qiang , WANG Chuan-ying , SHI Hua-tang , DING Gang , HU Sheng , WANG Yi-teng,. Discussion on mathematical description method of discontinuities in underground rock based on spatial coordinate system [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 410-414.
[14] YANG Shi-kou, REN Xu-hua, ZHANG Ji-xun. Study on cutting of 3D complex blocks with finite discontinuities [J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2206-2212.
[15] YANG Shi-kou, REN Xu-hua, ZHANG Ji-xun. A general method for geometric morphological analysis of complex blocks using Boolean operations [J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3576-3582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!