Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1427-1432.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2105

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls

XU Peng 1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu 1, 2, WANG Xun3, HUANG Hao-wei 1, HUANG Zhe2, WANG Zhi-meng3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-10-20 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Corporation (2014G003-C).

Abstract: Reinforced soil retaining walls are increasingly favored by designers in civil engineering because of its unique landscape performance and good seismic-resistance performance. As an integral part of the reinforced soil retaining walls, facing has a significant influence on its bearing capacity. In view of the fact that the existing design codes cannot consider the effect of facing form on the mechanical deformation characteristics of the structure itself, centrifuge model tests were carried out on walls with full-height panel facing and blocked facing. The following results are obtained: the displacement of the full-height panel facing is less than that of the blocked facing during the loading period. Since the larger displacement for the model wall with blocked facing, its horizontal earth pressure is smaller; stress concentration occurs at the bottom of the facing of the reinforced soil retaining wall. It is found that the soil-reinforcement friction coefficient for the reinforced soil retaining wall with blocked facing is larger than that in the case of full-height panel facing, while both of them are less than the recommended values from the design codes. The model walls are conservative due to the larger reinforcement length and the use of the anchor connector.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, facing, centrifuge model test, displacement, friction coefficient

CLC Number: 

  • TU 472
[1] ZHAO Jiu-bin, LIU Yuan-xue, HE Shao-qi, YANG Jun-tang, BAI Zhun, . Mathematical statistical model of horizontal displacement and rainfall of step deformation landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[2] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, YU Yun-yan, . Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh wave in non-homogeneous saturated foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[3] HUANG Fu-yun, CHEN Han-lun, DONG Rui, SHAN Yu-lin. Experimental study of single pile-soil interaction under horizontal low-cycle reciprocating displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[4] TIAN Shu-ping, GAO Meng, WANG Ying, CHEN Qing-sheng. Numerical analysis and field experiment on vibration isolation for Duxseal [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1770-1780.
[5] SONG Yi-min, ZHANG Yue, XU Hai-liang, WANG Ya-fei, HE Zhi-jie. Study on creep-slip and stick-slip deformation evolution of rock based on non-uniform characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[6] DENG Tao, LIN Cong-yu, LIU Zhi-peng, HUANG Ming, CHEN Wen-jing, . A simplified elastoplastic method for laterally loaded single pile with large displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[7] WANG Zhong-kai, XU Guang-li. Influence range and quantitative prediction of surface deformation during shield tunnelling and exiting stages [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[8] WANG Ti-qiang, WANG Yong-zhi, YUAN Xiao-ming, TANG Zhao-guang, WANG Hai, DUAN Xue-feng. Reliability analysis of acceleration integral displacement method based on shaking table tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 565-573.
[9] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, ZHANG Han, ZHOU Chang, GONG Hui, . Field test and calculation method of negative skin friction of rock-socketed piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[10] ZHANG Qiang, LI Xiao-chun, ZHOU Ying-bo, SHI Lu, BAI Bing, . Shear behavior of the Triassic sandstone in Sichuan under high pore pressure of H2O/CO2 conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[11] DENG Mao-lin, YI Qing-lin, HAN Bei, ZHOU Jian, LI Zhuo-jun, ZHANG Fu-ling, . Analysis of surface deformation law of Muyubao landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[12] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, HAN Run-bo, QIAO Lei. Research on generalized response displacement method for seismic analysis of underground structures with complex sections [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3247-3254.
[13] SHEN Hong, LI Xiao, LEI Mei-qing, XU Wen-bo, YU Xiu-ling, . Conception and model test of shear bond supporting system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
[14] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[15] CHEN Jian-xu, SONG Wen-wu, . Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!