Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1841-1846.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2128

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength

XU Peng1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, LEI Tao2, LIU Qi2, WANG Zhi-meng3, LIU Yong3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2017-10-21 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Corporation (2014G003-C), the Research Project of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd. ( KYY2018066(18-19)) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2018GZ0057).

Abstract: The displacements of reinforced soil retaining walls under seismic loads have a significant influence on their seismic performances. In order to calculate the displacements under earthquakes, Newmark’s sliding block method is usually used in design. As the traditional Newmark’s sliding block method neglects changes of soil strength, so the peak or residual strength is used in calculation, which lead to the calculated values being smaller or bigger than the actual values. Under the assumption of a two- wedge failure mechanism, sliding safety coefficient of reinforced earth retaining walls is obtained using the mechanical equilibrium equations of wedges. At the same time, the strain softening characteristic of backfills is considered by introducing thresholds of displacements. The following conclusions have been obtained by comparing the calculated values with the model tests. Compared with the single wedge method, the two-wedge method can better describe the actual failure mode of model walls and the calculated yield acceleration coefficient is closer to the test values. Compared with the calculated displacements by using the peak or residual strength, the calculated values from the proposed method where strain softening is considered is closer to the model test values.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, earthquake, displacement, strain softening, Newmark’s sliding block method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 443
[1] ZHAO Jiu-bin, LIU Yuan-xue, HE Shao-qi, YANG Jun-tang, BAI Zhun, . Mathematical statistical model of horizontal displacement and rainfall of step deformation landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[2] DU Wen-jie, SHENG Qian, FU Xiao-dong, TANG Hua, CHEN He, DU Yu-xiang, ZHOU Yong-qiang. Dynamic stability analysis and failure mechanism of Yanyang village landslide under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[3] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, YU Yun-yan, . Propagation characteristics of Rayleigh wave in non-homogeneous saturated foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[4] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[5] HUANG Fu-yun, CHEN Han-lun, DONG Rui, SHAN Yu-lin. Experimental study of single pile-soil interaction under horizontal low-cycle reciprocating displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[6] TIAN Shu-ping, GAO Meng, WANG Ying, CHEN Qing-sheng. Numerical analysis and field experiment on vibration isolation for Duxseal [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1770-1780.
[7] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[8] SONG Yi-min, ZHANG Yue, XU Hai-liang, WANG Ya-fei, HE Zhi-jie. Study on creep-slip and stick-slip deformation evolution of rock based on non-uniform characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[9] DENG Tao, LIN Cong-yu, LIU Zhi-peng, HUANG Ming, CHEN Wen-jing, . A simplified elastoplastic method for laterally loaded single pile with large displacement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[10] WANG Zhong-kai, XU Guang-li. Influence range and quantitative prediction of surface deformation during shield tunnelling and exiting stages [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[11] WANG Ti-qiang, WANG Yong-zhi, YUAN Xiao-ming, TANG Zhao-guang, WANG Hai, DUAN Xue-feng. Reliability analysis of acceleration integral displacement method based on shaking table tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 565-573.
[12] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, ZHANG Han, ZHOU Chang, GONG Hui, . Field test and calculation method of negative skin friction of rock-socketed piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[13] DENG Mao-lin, YI Qing-lin, HAN Bei, ZHOU Jian, LI Zhuo-jun, ZHANG Fu-ling, . Analysis of surface deformation law of Muyubao landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[14] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, HAN Run-bo, QIAO Lei. Research on generalized response displacement method for seismic analysis of underground structures with complex sections [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3247-3254.
[15] SHEN Hong, LI Xiao, LEI Mei-qing, XU Wen-bo, YU Xiu-ling, . Conception and model test of shear bond supporting system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!