›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 191-202.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0036

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimal size range study of rock specimen for double concentric annular core direct tensile test

GAO Gui-yun1, WANG Cheng-hu1, WANG Chun-quan2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Crustal Dynamics, Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China; 2. AVIC Institute of Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100098, China
  • Received:2017-11-27 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41704096), Fundamental Research Fund for State Level Scientific Institutes(ZDJ2017–13), and Project of Observation Instrument Development for Integrated Geophysical field of China Mainland(Y201616).

Abstract: Theoretically, direct tensile test is the most simple and effective method for determining the tensile strength of rocks, which is both theoretically and practically meaningful. However, clamping the specimens is a major difficult problem, which leads to the difficulties in preparing the specimens and the complicated test equipment. Double concentric annular core tension test is an innovative approach to laboratory determination of tensile strength of rocks, which could overcome the above-mentioned loading disadvantages of the conventional direct tension tests. Firstly, the mechanics of the double concentric annular core tension test is discussed; and then the specimen size effect and optimal size range are investigated experimentally and numerically to obtain more reliable tensile strengths. The results show that the maximum stress near the inner and outer bottom are close to each other and reliable tensile strength could be obtained when the ratio of outer ring diameter to specimen diameter r1/R is 0.62±0.08; the ratio of inner ring diameter to specimen diameter r2/R is 0.45±0.12; and the ratio of inner ring diameter to outer ring diameter r2/r1 is 0.64±0.06. Tensile strength results obtained from these tests could achieve the optimum least standard error and coefficient of variation compared with Brazilian test and hollow cylinder test.

Key words: tensile strength, double concentric annular core direct tensile test, size effect, optimal size range

CLC Number: 

  • TU 452

[1] LUO Zhao-gang, WANG Shi-ji, YANG Zhen-bei, . Quantitative analysis of fracture evolution of expansive soils under wetting-drying cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[2] HONG Chen-jie, HUANG Man, XIA Cai-chu, LUO Zhan-you, DU Shi-gui, . Study of size effect on the anisotropic variation coefficient of rock joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[3] ZHANG Mao-chu, SHENG Qian, CUI Zhen, MA Ya-li-na, ZHOU Guang-xin. Effect of loading rate on tensile strength of rock materials and morphology of fracture joint surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[4] YAN Chao-ping, LONG Zhi-lin, ZHOU Yi-chun, KUANG Du-min, CHEN Jia-min, . Investigation on the effects of confining pressure and particle size of shear characteristics of calcareous sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[5] ZHOU Meng-jia, WEN Yan-feng, DENG Gang, WANG Yun-jia, SONG Er-xiang, . Three-dimensional discrete element simulation of random breaking strength and size effect in single particle splitting test of rockfill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 503-510.
[6] WU Shun-chuan, MA Jun, CHENG Ye, CHENG Zi-qiao, LI Jian-yu, . Review of the flattened Brazilian test and research on the three dimensional crack initiation point [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[7] JI En-yue, CHEN Sheng-shui, FU Zhong-zhi, . Experimental investigations on tensile cracking mechanical characteristics of gravelly core material [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4777-4782.
[8] LI Yang, SHE Cheng-xue. Numerical simulation of effect of size on crushing strength of rockfill grains using particle flow code [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2951-2959.
[9] LIU Yue-dong, LIN Jian, FENG Yan-jun, SI Lin-po,. Research on tensile strength of rock based on hydraulic fracturing method [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1781-1788.
[10] TENG Shang-yong, YANG Sheng-qi, HUANG Yan-hua, TIAN Wen-ling, . Experimental study of influence of crack filling on mechanical properties of Brazilian discs [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4493-4507.
[11] SU Hui, YANG Jia-qi, HU Bao-wen, GAO Xuan, MA Hui, . Study of particle size effect of rock model based on particle discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4642-4651.
[12] WU Qiu-hong, ZHAO Fu-jun, LI Xi-bing, WANG Shi-ming, WANG Bin, ZHOU Zhi-hua,. Mechanical properties of ring specimens of sandstone subjected to diametral compression [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3969-3975.
[13] XUE Chen, FU Wen-xi, HE Si-ming,. Development of assembled variable dimension direct shear apparatus [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3907-3914.
[14] ZHOU Hai-juan, MA Gang, YUAN Weir, ZHOU Wei, CHANG Xiao-lin, . Size effect on the crushing strengths of rock particles [J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2425-2433.
[15] LUO Han, LI Rong-jian, LIU Jun-ding, HUO Xü-ting, ZHANG Zhen, SUN Ping,. Comparison of active earth pressure formulations of loess based on joint strength [J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2080-2086.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!