›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4191-4200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0378

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Two-stage back analysis of initial geostress field in rockburst area based on lateral pressure coefficient

MENG Wei, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, ZHANG Jun-bo, WU Fang-yin, XIA Wu-yang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031 China
  • Received:2018-03-18 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC0802201), the National Natural Science Fund(51878571, 51578456) and the Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program of China Railway Corporation(2017G006-B).

Abstract: In order to accurately obtain the distribution rule of initial geostress field of Sangzhuling tunnel site, a two-stage back method to calculate initial geostress in rockburst area is presented. Based on the least square method, multiple linear regression is used to analyze the initial geostress field and with superposition principle, the initial geostress field is obtained. The wall stress after tunnel excavation is measured through stress relief method. According to the site of rockburst, the lateral pressure coefficient is acquired and then compared with its equivalent value from the primary inversion in the corresponding position. If both values are larger than or equal to or less than one, then the lateral pressure coefficient is assumed to be the calculated value of primary inversion and the value is taken as the constraint condition to modify the initial geostress. When the calculated secondary wall stress acquired from the modified initial geostress is close to the measured one, the secondary geostress is obtained through the regression analysis with the modified initial geostress and in-situ geostress. The conclusions show that when a small number of boreholes are used for in-situ geostress and with a large computational domain, there are some errors between the measured stress and the calculated stress from the primary inversion in positions far from the boreholes. Furthermore, based on in-situ geostress, the secondary inversion modifies results by using measured secondary wall stress as a complement, and then the calculated stress in positions far from the boreholes shows better agreement with the measured stress, which can be presented as an inversion method to provide reference for similar research projects.

Key words: lateral pressure coefficient, rockburst, geostress field, back analysis, surface stress relief method

CLC Number: 

  • TU 32
[1] LIU Quan-sheng, WANG Dong, ZHU Yuan-guang, YANG Zhan-biao, BO Yin. Application of support vector regression algorithm in inversion of geostress field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[2] CHEN Bing-rui, FENG Xia-ting, FU Qi-qing, WANG Bo, ZHU Xin-hao, LI Tao, LU Cai-ping, XIA Huan, . Integration and high precision intelligence microseismic monitoring technology and its application in deep rock engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3] LI Tong, FENG Xia-ting, WANG Rui, XIAO Ya-xun, WANG Yong, FENG Guang-liang, YAO Zhi-bin, NIU Wen-jing, . Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[4] ZHOU Hui, CHEN Jun, ZHANG Chuan-qing, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, JIANG Yue, . Experimental study of the rockburst model material with low-strength and high-brittleness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2039-2049.
[5] SU Guo-shao, YAN Si-zhou, YAN Zhao-fu, ZHAI Shao-bin, YAN Liu-bin, . Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[6] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[7] YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, MENG Wei, . Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[8] MEI Shi-ming, HU Xiao-chuan, SU Guo-shao, CHEN Guan-yan, . Model test study of the influence of intermediate principal stress on rockburst in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[9] LI Lian-xiang, LIU Jia-dian, LI Ke-jin, HUANG Heng-li, JI Xiang-kai, . Study of parameters selection and applicability of HSS model in typical stratum of Jinan [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[10] ZHAO Fei, WANG Hong-jian, HE Man-chao, YUAN Guang-xiang, LUO Yao-wu, . Acoustic emission characteristics of granite specimens with different heights in rockburst tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[11] WANG Zhi-dong, LI Li-yun, CHEN Tao, LIU Bing-quan, . Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[12] DONG Zhi-hong, NIU Xin-qiang, DING Xiu-li, WENG YongHong, HUANG Shu-ling, PEI Qi-tao, ZHANG Lian, . Deformation characteristics and feedback analysis of surrounding rock of underground powerhouse at left bank of Wudongde Hydropower Station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[13] ZHU Si-tao, JIANG Fu-xing, ZHU Hai-zhou, ZHANG Jun-jie, LIAN Hong-quan, HAN Guo-qing, . Study of mechanism of rockburst accident in heading face in high stress area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[14] SUN Ming-she, MA Tao, SHEN Zhi-jun, WU Xu, WANG Meng-shu,. Study of lining sharing surrounding rock pressure in composite lining structure [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[15] WANG Shao-jie, LU Ai-zhong, ZHANG Xiao-li. Analytical method of displacement back analysis for horseshoe tunnel excavated in transverse isotropic rock mass [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!