Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4220-4228.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1615

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load

WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan   

  1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
  • Received:2018-09-03 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-11-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China(41962017, 51469005), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province of China(2017GXNSFAA198170) and Guangxi University of Science and Technology Graduate Education Innovation Program(YCSW2018201).

Abstract: To investigate the dynamic response of reinforced earth abutment structure under dynamic action of the top strip footing, dynamic load failure test of the indoor reinforced abutment retaining wall was carried out by MTS servo loading system with cyclic dynamic load. Comparative analysis of the reinforced earth retaining wall parameters with three grid lengths and three grid types, such as settlement of reinforced soil retaining wall, horizontal displacement of the panel, earth pressure and strain of the reinforcement, etc. hence revealing the dynamic bearing capacity of reinforced abutment retaining wall. The test results show that there are differences in failure modes of different geogrid lengths and types of reinforced abutment retaining walls under cyclic dynamic loading. When 1.0H, the failure modes of retaining wall of M-A-B-type geogrids are punching shear failure. And when 0.7H and 0.4H, the failure mode of retaining wall of A-type and B-type geogrids are local shear failure. The lateral displacement of the reinforced abutment retaining wall panel decreases with increasing reinforcement length, and the lateral displacement coefficient of the A-type grid reinforced retaining wall is generally smaller than that of the B-type. Due to the length and type of the reinforced geogrid, the abutment retaining wall has significant difference in the attenuation law of the dynamic earth pressure. When 1.0H, the vertical dynamic earth pressure attenuation coefficient of M-type and A-type geogrids are parabolic function along the wall height. When 0.7H, the vertical dynamic earth pressure attenuation coefficient of A-type and B-type geogrids are exponential function along the wall height.

Key words: abutment soil retaining wall, geogrid, bearing behavior, dynamic characteristics

CLC Number: 

  • U 417
[1] ZHANG Lei, HAI Wei-shen, GAN Hao, CAO Wei-ping, WANG Tie-hang, . Study on bearing behavior of flexible single pile subject to horizontal and uplift combined load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[2] ZOU Xin-jun, CAO Xiong, ZHOU Chang-lin, . Model study on the bearing behavior of V-H combined loaded pile in sand considering the current effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[3] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[4] SUN Jing, GONG Mao-sheng, XIONG Hong-qiang, GAN Lin-rui, . Experimental study of the effect of freeze-thaw cycles on dynamic characteristics of silty sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[5] QIN Yu-lan, ZOU Xin-jun, CAO Xiong. Internal forces and deformations of a single pile in uniform sand under combined action of horizontal harmonic load and torque [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[6] YU Ting, SHAO Lei. Study of dynamic characteristics of dam foundation on deep riverbed overburden with soft soil layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[7] YIN Feng, ZHOU Hang, LIU Han-long, CHU Jian, . Experimental investigation on dynamic characteristics of XCC pile-geogrid composite foundation under static and dynamic loads of vehicles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1324-1330.
[8] WANG Qin-ke, MA Jian-lin, HU Zhong-bo, WANG Bin, . Field tests on bearing behaviors of uplift piles in soft rock with shallow overburden [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[9] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[10] LIU Fang-cheng, WU Meng-tao, YANG Jun, . Experimental study of strength characteristics of geogrid reinforced rubber sand mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[11] WANG Jun, SHI Jing, LIU Fei-yu, CAI Yuan-qiang, . Effect of particle gradation on static and dynamic direct shear properties of geogrid-sand interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 109-117.
[12] WANG Yi-min, YAN Cen, YU Heng, LI Qi. Experimental study of soil stress characteristics of geogrid-reinforced widened embankment under static loadings [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[13] ZHANG Xiang-dong, LI Jun, SUN Qi, YI Fu, LIU Jia-shun, QU Zhi, . Study of dynamic performance under negative temperature and rheology characteristic for cement improved aeolian sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4395-4403.
[14] REN Fei-fan, HE Jiang-yang, WANG Guan, ZHAO Qi-hua, . Numerical analysis of dynamic characteristics of coarse grained soils based on Cyclic-mobility constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4627-4641.
[15] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LIU Zheng-quan, ZHOU Yuan-wu. Large model test on geogrid reinforced sand soil foundation under dynamic loading [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!