Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 336-341.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0417

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on orientation layout of pressure sensing units by rheological stress recovery method

LIU Quan-sheng1, 2, LUO Ci-you1, 3, ZHU Yuan-guang1, JIANG Jing-dong4, LIU He1, 3, PENG Xing-xin5, PAN Yu-cong2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Structural Safety Engineering of Hubei Province, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 5. China Railway 11th Bureau Group 4th Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430073, China
  • Received:2019-02-24 Revised:2019-05-29 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (2015CB058102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874275, 41807250)

Abstract: Real-time measurement of deep three-dimensional geostress field distribution and disturbance law are very important for the engineering analysis of rock mass stability. However, there lacks the mature testing technology and supporting instruments for measuring the ground stress in weak surrounding rock at depth. The article firstly introduces in details the fundamental principles and technology of the rheological stress recovery method of the ground stress test for deep soft rock. Then in-depth theoretical analysis is carried out to study the rationality of sensing units’ layout of the rock mass pressure sensor. The results show that if the three sensing surfaces of the upper hemisphere of the six-direction pressure sensor are set to be perpendicular to each other’s normal direction, the three sensing surfaces of the lower hemisphere cannot be arranged perpendicular to each other’s normal direction; if the three sensing surfaces of the upper hemisphere are set to be perpendicular to each other’s normal direction, the three sensing surfaces’ normal direction of the lower hemisphere cannot be parallel to the three sensing surfaces’ of the upper hemisphere, and two of the three sensing surfaces of the lower hemisphere cannot have their normal directions perpendicular to any of the sensing surfaces’ normal direction of the upper hemisphere, three sensing surfaces of the lower hemisphere cannot be close to perpendicular to each other, and the cosine of the normal direction and the x, y, z axes are preferably not much different. If the three sensing surfaces of the upper hemisphere are not perpendicular to each other, a layout design is considered with the three sensing surfaces of the upper hemisphere having their normal directions set at an angle of 45° to the horizontal plane and those of lower hemisphere set at an angle of 30° to the horizontal plane, and the angle of the sensing surfaces’ the normal directions of the upper and lower hemispheres projected on the Oxy horizontal plane to be 60°. The calculation results show that this arrangement is one of the arrangements that are scientifically sound.

Key words: rheological stress recovery method, pressure sensor, sensing units, orientation layout

CLC Number: 

  • O 319.56
[1] WANG Wei,LI Xiao-chun. Experimental study of propagation law of explosive stress wave under condition of decouple charge [J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1723-1728.
[2] FANG Jian-guo ,SUN Feng ,YOU Chun-an,. Numerical analysis of observed stresses of pressure sensor [J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 137-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!