Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 452-468.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0737

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Review and prospect of model test system for tunnel engineering structure

LIU Bo1, XU Fei2, 3, ZHAO Wei-gang2, GAO Yang2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Large Structure Health Monitoring and Control, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-05-15 Revised:2022-03-26 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-15

Abstract: In recent years, tunnel engineering is developing towards super-long and deep, multi-field and multi-phase coupling, thus, which easily induce the structural instability during tunnel construction and operation. Aiming at the mountain tunnel, underwater tunnel and urban tunnel, this paper expounds the research status of structural model test system, and points out the existing issues. The results show that: mountain tunnel model test takes into account passing through the adverse geological rock, and the loading conditions such as high ground stress, high karst hydraulic pressure and high seismic intensity. However, it’s hard to simulate the high stress of surrounding rock due to the size limitation of the apparatus. The model test of mountain tunnel is mainly based on plane strain model, which lacks the simulation of active fault with various dislocation forms under large-scale true three-dimensional stress condition. The model test of underwater tunnel has achieved stable high water pressure loading, but it is still unable to simulate the true three-dimensional underwater environment of the coupled stress field and seepage field. Additionally, the visibility of the chamber is poor, the seepage of the tunnel is only be characterized by the water inflow at the entrance, which makes it difficult to obtain the deformation law of the surrounding rock. Urban tunnel is affected by train dynamic load, pavement load and adjacent construction disturbance. At present, the model test usually considers the vibration response of the tunnel under a single load, and often ignores the structural characteristics such as segment joints and cracks. Thus, it is necessary to design novel and efficient local loading device to analyze the ultimate deformation characteristics of weak parts of segment to ensure the safety of subway operation. Finally, the bottleneck issues of tunnel engineering model test are summarized, and the internal visualization of the apparatus needs to be improved based on transparent similar materials. Aiming at the adverse geological conditions under high geostress conditions, a three-dimensional static-dynamic coupled model test system with expandable size is developed. Combining with the micro low-power wireless monitoring sensors and 3D visualization results display platform, a tunnel engineering structure model test system suitable for complex environment is established.

Key words: mountain tunnel, underwater tunnel, urban metro tunnel, model test system

CLC Number: 

  • U459
[1] ZHENG Li-fu, GAO Yong-tao, ZHOU Yu, TIAN Shu-guang. Research on optimization of frozen wall thickness of underwater tunnel based on fluid-solid coupling theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1029-1038.
[2] CHEN Wu, ZHANG Guo-hua, WANG Hao, CHEN Li-biao, . Risk assessment of mountain tunnel collapse based on rough set and conditional information entropy [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558.
[3] ZHANG Wei-jie , LI Shu-cai , WEI Jiu-chuan , ZHANG Qing-song , ZHANG Xiao , LI Zhi-peng , XIE Dao-lei,. Development of a 3D grouting model test system and its application [J]. , 2016, 37(3): 902-911.
[4] TAO Lian-jin,HOU Sen,ZHAO Xu,CHOU Wen-ge,GUO Fei,LI Shu-long. Large-scale shaking table test for dynamic response in portal section of mountain tunnel with different gradients of upward slope [J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 91-98.
[5] WU Dong,GAO Bo,SHEN Yu-sheng,ZHOU Jia-mei. Shaking table test study of seismic dynamic response of tunnel entrance slope [J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1921-1928.
[6] JIANG Shu-ping,FANG Lin,LIN Zhi. Seismic response analysis of mountain tunnels in different depths [J]. , 2014, 35(1): 211-216.
[7] YU Li-yuan , CHEN Xiao-peng , HAN Li-jun , WANG Ying-chao . Elastic analysis of surrounding rock for underwater tunnels based on functions of complex variables method [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 345-351.
[8] ZHANG Zhi-qiang,HE Ben-guo,WANG Zhi-jie,LI Hua-yun,LIU Yun-jun. Study of method and effect of high-position drainage of tunnel in water-rich fault [J]. , 2012, 33(11): 3359-3366.
[9] ZHANG Zhi-qiang, HE Ben-guo, HE Chuan. Study of load of lining under condition of saturated stratum for underwater tunnels [J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2465-2470.
[10] CHEN Jie-jin,ZHOU Feng,YANG Jun-sheng,LIU Bao-chen. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk evaluation of collapse during construction of mountain tunnel [J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2365-2370.
[11] WANG Xiu-ying, TAN Zhong-sheng, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. Analysis of interaction between surrounding rock and lining in high water-level tunnels with controlled drainage [J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1623-1628.
[12] WANG Xiu-ying, TAN Zhong-sheng, WANG Meng-shu, ZHANG Mi. Analysis of mechanical character of surrounding rock with controlled drainage in mountain tunnels [J]. , 2008, 29(1): 75-80.
[13] ZHANG Jun-ru,QIU Wen-ge. In-situ test and data analysis of frost-heave force of Kunlun Mountain Tunnel [J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 564-568.
[14] GAO Xin-qiang , QIU Wen-ge , GAO Yang,. Plane numerical analysis of mechanical behaviors of lining structure under high hydraulic pressure in mountain tunnel [J]. , 2005, 26(3): 365-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .