›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 463-465.

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Significance of soil dilatancy in bearing capacity of ground

ZHANG Pei-wen1, CHEN Zu-yu2   

  1. 1.Central Research Institute of Building & Consturction, Beijing 100088, China; 2.Department of Geotechnical Engineering, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2004-07-14 Online:2006-03-10 Published:2013-11-06

Abstract: The numerical simulation method for the ultimate bearing capacity of ground is presented by adopting the theory of finite element strength reduction; and the significance in bearing capacity of the ground of the dilatancy angle of the material for the ground is discussed. An example is given; and its results show that the ultimate bearing capacity of ground is increased with the increasing of dilatancy angle; therefore, it’s of great need of considering the dilatancy angle of the ground material, when the ultimate bearing capacity of the ground is accounted.

Key words: dilatancy, bearing capacity of ground, strength reduction, dilatancy angle

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
  • Please send e-mail to pingzhou3@126.com if you would like to read full paper in English for free. Parts of our published papers have English translations.
[1] LI Jian-peng, GAO Ling, MU Huan-sheng. Dilatancy characteristics of sandstone and its function of dilatancy angle under high confining pressure and unloading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[2] HE Zi-lu, LIU Wei, HE Si-ming, YAN Shuai-xing, . Shear dilatancy mechanism and process simulation of rapid sliding of saturated loose deposits [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[3] WANG Feng-yun, QIAN De-ling, . Dilatancy analysis for a circular tunnel excavated in rock mass based on unified strength theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[4] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, CHEN Jun, LU Jing-jing, CUI Guo-jian, YANG Pin-qing, . Experimental study of shear deformation characteristics of marble dentate joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[5] LU Yong, ZHOU Guo-qing , YANG Dong-ying, SONG Jia-qing, . Explicit calculation of sand unified model combining shear dilatancy softening and shear shrinkage hardening [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[6] DONG Jian-xun, LIU Hai-xiao, LI Zhou. A bounding surface plasticity model of sand for cyclic loading analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[7] WANG Zhen, CAO Lan-zhu, WANG Dong, . Evaluation on upper limit of heterogeneous slope stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 737-742.
[8] WANG Jun, HU Hui-li, LIU Fei-yu, CAI Yuan-qiang, . Effects of direct shear characteristics of sand-geogrid interface under different aperture ratios [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.
[9] WU Yong-sheng, TAN Zhong-sheng, YU Xian-bin, YU Yu, ZHU Yong,. Dilatancy behavior of phyllite in uniaxal compressive tests under different loading azimuths [J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2747-2754.
[10] SUN Kai, CHEN Zheng-lin, LU De-chun,. An elastoplastic constitutive model incorporating cementation effect of stabilizer-treated soil [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1589-1597.
[11] XU Xiao, ZHAO Cheng-gang, . Shear strength and volume change behavior of clay-rich soil at high suctions [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1598-1611.
[12] ZHU Shun-ran, XU Chao, DING Jin-hua,. Laminated shear test of geotextile-sand interface [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1775-1780.
[13] TANG Yu-feng, SHI Fu-qiang, LIAO Xue-yan, ZHOU Shuai, . Determination on flow rules of large deformation analysis of slope using SPH method [J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1509-1516.
[14] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, . A new method to originally reproduce rock structural plane by integrating 3D scanning and 3D carving techniques and mechanical characteristics of reproduced structural planes [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 417-425.
[15] KONG Xian-jing, ZHU Fa-yong, LIU Jing-mao, ZOU De-gao, NING Fan-wei, . Stress dilatancy of rockfill material under different loading directions [J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3915-3920.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WEI Long-hai, WANG Ming-nian, ZHAO Dong-ping, JI Yan-lei. Study of deformation controlling measures for large-span shallow tunnel[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 577 -581 .
[2] CHEN Yun-ping, WANG Si-jing. Elastoplastic response of saturated rocks subjected to multilevel cyclic loading[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1030 -1034 .
[3] JIA Qiang,ZHANG Xin. Numerical analysis of slab underpinning construction in development of underground space[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1989 -1994 .
[4] GU Shao-fu, LIU Yang-shao, LIU Shi-shun. Study of application of Asaoka method to settlement prediction[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2238 -2240 .
[5] LI Xiong-wei, KONG Ling-wei, GUO Ai-guo. Field response characteristic test of expansive soil engineering behavior under effect of atmosphere[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2069 -2074 .
[6] SONG Yong-jun , HU Wei , WANG De-sheng , ZHOU Jun-lin. Analysis of squeezing effect of compaction piles based on modified Cam-clay model[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811 -814 .
[7] LU Tao, WANG Kong-wei, LI Jian-lin. Study of failure mode of sandstone under reservoir water pressures[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[8] WEI Ming-yao, WANG En-yuan, LIU Xiao-fei, WANG Chao. Numerical simulation of rockburst prevention effect by blasting pressure relief in deep coal seam[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .
[9] ZHU Yuan-guang,LIU Quan-sheng,ZHANG Cheng-yuan,SHI Kai. Nonlinear viscoelastic creep property of rock with time-temperature equivalence effect[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2303 -2309 .
[10] HUANG Mao-song ,LI Bo . Analysis of interaction mechanism of flexible raft-piles in layered soils under repeated loading[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2388 -2394 .