›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 143-147.

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correlation analysis of standard penetration test results on British and Chinese standard equipments

LIAO Xian-bin,GUO Xiao-yong,DU Yu   

  1. Fourth Harbor Engineering Investigation and Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Communications Construction Company, Guangzhou 510230, China
  • Received:2012-02-27 Online:2013-01-10 Published:2013-01-10

Abstract: In order to make good use of the standard penetration test (SPT) results on British Standard (BS) equipment during the Chinese geotechnical design, BS and Chinese Standard (GB) SPT equipment and results are analyzed to evaluate their correlation. The main difference between BS and GB equipment is that BS anvil quality is larger than GB; and different hitting energy and SPT values are caused. SPT analyzer has been used to measure the actual hitting energy of SPT on BS and GB equipments configured with different diameter rods. In order to analyze the correlation between SPT values of BS and GB, and establish correlation formula, the BS and GB energy ratio that actual hitting energy was divided by theory hitting energy are calculated. The conclusions are as follows: BS equipment is smaller hitting energy and the value of SPT is higher than GB equipment. The rod 50 mm in diameter has higher hitting energy and smaller value of SPT than the rod 42 mm in diameter. Correlation of the standard penetration test results on BS and GB has been set up. Therefore the data based on BS SPT equipments will be more reliable to be utilized in GB and also evaluate the appropriated geotechnical parameter in terms of GB SPT results.

Key words: standard penetration test (SPT), British Standard (BS), Chinese Standard (GB), anvil quality, hitting energy

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] CHEN Guo-xing ,KONG Meng-yun ,LI Xiao-jun ,CHANG Xiang-dong ,ZHOU Guo-liang,. Deterministic and probabilistic triggering correlations for assessment of seismic soil liquefaction at nuclear power plant [J]. , 2015, 36(1): 9-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WEI Long-hai, WANG Ming-nian, ZHAO Dong-ping, JI Yan-lei. Study of deformation controlling measures for large-span shallow tunnel[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 577 -581 .
[2] CHEN Yun-ping, WANG Si-jing. Elastoplastic response of saturated rocks subjected to multilevel cyclic loading[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1030 -1034 .
[3] CHEN Yu,ZHANG Qing-he,ZHU Ji-wen,YAO Hai-ming. Coupled fluid-mechanical analysis of DOT shield tunnel construction beneath adjacent existing underpass[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1950 -1955 .
[4] JIA Qiang,ZHANG Xin. Numerical analysis of slab underpinning construction in development of underground space[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1989 -1994 .
[5] GU Shao-fu, LIU Yang-shao, LIU Shi-shun. Study of application of Asaoka method to settlement prediction[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2238 -2240 .
[6] LI Xiong-wei, KONG Ling-wei, GUO Ai-guo. Field response characteristic test of expansive soil engineering behavior under effect of atmosphere[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2069 -2074 .
[7] SONG Yong-jun , HU Wei , WANG De-sheng , ZHOU Jun-lin. Analysis of squeezing effect of compaction piles based on modified Cam-clay model[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811 -814 .
[8] SUN De-an,MENG De-lin,SUN Wen-jing,LIU Yue-miao. Soil-water characteristic curves of two bentonites[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 973 -0978 .
[9] LU Tao, WANG Kong-wei, LI Jian-lin. Study of failure mode of sandstone under reservoir water pressures[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[10] WEI Ming-yao, WANG En-yuan, LIU Xiao-fei, WANG Chao. Numerical simulation of rockburst prevention effect by blasting pressure relief in deep coal seam[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .