›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S1): 257-263.

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of uniform gradient magnetic field in geomechanics magnetic model test

BI Jin-feng, LUO Xian-qi, SHEN Hui   

  1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2013-10-20 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-20

Abstract: Geomechanics magnetic model test is a new test method that simulates gravity field with electromagnetic force field to study geomechanical engineering problems. In geomechanics magnetic model test, the magnetic field is achieved by solenoid and the similar material is made from the mixture of ferromagnetic material and rock-soil mass. The magnetic force, which is decided by the magnetic flux density gradient, will act on ferromagnetic material when it is put in a gradient magnetic field. In order to simulate the uniform gravitational field, a magnetic field with same magnitude and unidirection is needed in a certain space. According to the principle of magnetic circuit design and from different perspectives, three different kinds of magnetic circuit are presented to obtain the requisite magnet field to load the ferromagnetic material. In the optimum test space, the open type magnetic circuit can make full use of the magnetic field so that its magnetic flux density gradient can reach a larger quantity when the current is same; but the uniformity is not as good as expected. Taking advantage of the assumption of no magnetic dispersion, the closed type magnetic circuit has a better performance than the open ones. Comparing with the other two magnetic circuits, though the semi-open type is slightly inferior in terms of weight and efficiency, the uniformity of magnetic flux density gradient is the best of all; whose error is within 5%. In addition, because of the distribution of the coils and the test space, it is more convenient to arrange the testing instruments and loading device. Therefore, the semi-open type magnetic circuit is the optimal choice as the magnetic field generator for geomechanics magnetic model test.

Key words: geomechanics, magnetic model test, soft magnetic material, uniform gradient magnetic field

CLC Number: 

  • P 55
[1] LUO Xian-qi, BI Jin-feng. Principle and engineering application of geomechanics magnetic model test [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 367-374.
[2] LUO Xian-qi,CHENG Sheng-guo,ZHANG Zhen-hua,TANG Kai. Study of similarity theory of geomechanical model test in electromagnetic field [J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1035-1039.
[3] KONG Liang , Ian F. Collins . Thermomechanical approach to modeling constitutive behaviors of geomaterials [J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1732-1740.
[4] HUANG Cheng, YANG Chun-he, WANG An-ming. Using of full probability method to statistically estimate results of numerical simulation for geomechanics [J]. , 2008, 29(11): 2919-2926.
[5] LI Zhen-ze, TANG Xiao-wu. Deduction and verification of a new strength criterion for soils [J]. , 2007, 28(6): 1247-1249.
[6] LI Yong ,ZHANG Qiang-yong ,ZHANG Xu-tao ,WANG Han-peng ,YANG Wen-dong ,ZHANG Jian-guo,. Three dimensional geomechanical model test study on Baziling Bifurcated Tunnel [J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 586-590.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] SUN Shu-lin,LI Fang,CHEN Jun. Electrical resistivity measurement for lime-stabilized silt soil[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] LI Ying-yong,ZHANG Ding-li,ZHANG Hong-bo,SONG Xiu-guang. Research on failure mechanism and effects of prestressed anchor cables for reinforcing slopes[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] LIANG Jian-wei, FANG Ying-guang, GU Ren-guo. Analysis of microelectric field effect of seepage in tiny-particle clay[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] WANG Li-yan,JIANG Peng-ming,LIU Han-long. Mechanism analysis of residual liquefied deformation of breakwater during earthquake[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] LI Xiu-zhen,WANG Cheng-hua,DENG Hong-yan. A comparison of distance and Fisher discrimination methods applied to identifying potential landslides[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] JI Wu-jun. Investigation and analysis of engineering problems for loess tunnels[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] CHEN Li-hua , LIN Zhi , LI Xing-ping. Study of efficacy of systematic anchor bolts in highway tunnels[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] CHEN Li-wen, SUN De-an. Bifurcation analysis of overconsolidated clays with soil-water coupling along different stress paths[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] ZHENG Gang ZHANG Li-ming DIAO Yu. Analysis of working performance of piles beneath excavation bottom and settlement calculation[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] ZHAO Ming-hua, LEI Yong, ZHANG Rui. Study of punching failure mode and safe thickness of pile foundation in karst region[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .